Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lê Nin☭Admin TradeCoinUnderground

Channel

Lê Nin☭Admin TradeCoinUnderground

@LeninTradecoinUnder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,997subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002064215419
TypeChannel
Username@LeninTradecoinUnder
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LeninTradecoinUnder

Growth

12,99713,16213,079.56 August 2026 — 13,099 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,118 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,127 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,142 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,141 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,148 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,149 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,150 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,154 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,162 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,159 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,153 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,145 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,136 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,132 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,125 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,112 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,099 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,086 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,083 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,073 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,067 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,054 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,051 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,048 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,042 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,039 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,027 subscribers9 September 2026 — 12,997 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 34 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,972–13,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:5612,997-30
5 Sept 2026, 20:0113,027-12
3 Sept 2026, 21:5613,039-3
2 Sept 2026, 15:3613,042-6
1 Sept 2026, 14:2413,048-3
31 Aug 2026, 15:3813,051-3
30 Aug 2026, 17:3513,054-13
29 Aug 2026, 20:1313,067-6
28 Aug 2026, 20:4913,073-3
27 Aug 2026, 21:4813,076-7
27 Aug 2026, 00:4413,083-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:5813,086-13
25 Aug 2026, 01:4413,099-13
23 Aug 2026, 13:5413,112-13
22 Aug 2026, 02:2813,125-7
20 Aug 2026, 17:3613,132-4
19 Aug 2026, 17:1613,136-9
18 Aug 2026, 17:5213,145-8
17 Aug 2026, 19:4813,153-6
16 Aug 2026, 14:2913,159first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.85%
avg views ÷ 12,997 subscribers
Avg views / post
890
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.556%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held76 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total55,186
Reactions total307
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

417 reactions across 73 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 99.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
41499.3%
😘30.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 448 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC480 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Giá cứ chạm đúng stop loss xong mới phi một mạch đúng hướng? Không phải trùng hợp, đó là trò săn thanh khoản. • Thị trường luôn tìm đến nơi có nhiều lệnh chờ – chính là cụm stop loss của trader • Khi thanh khoản đủ lớn, cá mập mới đẩy giá đi mạnh • Hiểu thanh khoản = hiểu vì sao hay bị “quét” rồi giá mới chạy Muốn hạn chế bị săn stop, phải đọc được vùng liquidity trước khi đặt lệnh. Giao dịch ít mà chuẩn còn hơn tr

😘1

2 Sept 2026, 02:02 UTC932 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Giá quét sạch thanh khoản rồi quay đầu chạy luôn, không phải ngẫu nhiên. Cốt lõi là đọc đúng phản ứng sau cú sweep. Hiểu được: – Giá vừa săn stop hay thật sự đảo chiều – Volume, lực nến và vùng phản ứng sau sweep – 3 mô hình vào lệnh theo từng kiểu phản ứng Lúc đó mỗi cú quét thanh khoản không còn là cú tát, mà là cơ hội vào lệnh gọn, dừng lỗ ngắn, RR đẹp. #priceaction #liquidity #forex #trading #smartmoney

6

1 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC959 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Order Block bị phá chưa chắc là thua lỗ Hiểu sai 1 khái niệm là bỏ lỡ cả đống kèo đẹp. Order Block bị phá không phải lúc nào cũng fail, đôi khi đó là lúc Smart Money chuyển kèo sang Breaker Block. – Giá phá qua OB – Thanh khoản bị quét sạch – Vùng cũ trở thành điểm vào mới cho dòng tiền lớn Ai hiểu được cách dòng tiền chơi với Breaker Block sẽ bớt FOMO, bớt sợ stoploss, vào lệnh gọn hơn. #priceaction #smartmoney

7

1 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC970 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Smart Money không chạy theo giá, Smart Money dắt giá đi Hiểu đúng về Liquidity: – Vì sao giá hay chạm đúng “đỉnh/đáy” rồi quay xe – Cách dòng tiền lớn săn stoploss, tạo bẫy FOMO, phá vỡ giả – Vùng thanh khoản thật sự nơi tổ chức gom/xả, không phải mấy điểm vẽ cho đẹp Nắm được Liquidity: – Thấy trước điểm giá dễ bị “đập” – Tìm được entry sạch, RR ngon – Bớt cháy vì những cú rút chân, quét SL vô lý Trade theo dấu ti

6

31 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC911 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Combo FVG + OB + Demand: công thức khoá vị trí mà trader chuyên nghiệp luôn rình Không phải cứ thấy giá đẹp là lao vào, mà là: • FVG: khoảng trống giá để lại dấu vết smart money • OB: vùng mà tổ chức từng vào lệnh mạnh • Demand: nơi lực mua trực chờ kích hoạt Khi 3 yếu tố này trùng nhau, đó là vùng giá vàng để chờ, không phải để đuổi. Hiểu đúng vùng, ngồi im cũng là một dạng kỷ luật. #trading #priceaction #smartmo

5

31 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC987 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

BOS, CHoCH, MSS nghe rối nhưng là nền tảng để đọc cấu trúc giá cho đúng Hiểu rõ: – BOS: xu hướng đang được tiếp diễn – CHoCH: dấu hiệu thị trường muốn đổi chiều – MSS: cấu trúc bị phá sâu, trend cũ coi như “toang” Nắm vững 3 khái niệm này, tự khắc biết: – Khi nào nên vào lệnh theo xu hướng – Khi nào đứng ngoài cho an toàn – Khi nào canh đảo chiều cho hợp lý Trade ít lệnh nhưng đúng cấu trúc, tài khoản đỡ bầm dập h

8😘1

30 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC965 views8 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Ước gì biết BOS, CHOCH sớm hơn… Rất nhiều người mất tiền chỉ vì không hiểu cấu trúc thị trường, vào lệnh ngược xu hướng rồi ngồi gồng lỗ. BOS, CHOCH không phải mấy chữ cho vui, mà là tín hiệu thị trường đang “đổi kèo” hay tiếp diễn, quyết định: – Nên vào lệnh hay đứng ngoài – Giữ lệnh hay cắt sớm – Đánh thuận trend hay ngược trend Nắm vững BOS, CHOCH là bước đầu để không cháy tài khoản vô nghĩa. #trading #forex #p

8

30 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC938 views11 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

4 setup đơn giản mà tăng hẳn xác suất thắng lệnh Không cần quá cao siêu, chỉ cần: – Hiểu rõ bối cảnh thị trường – Chờ đúng mẫu hình giá quen thuộc – Vào lệnh theo plan, không theo cảm xúc – Quản lý vốn chặt, không all-in Ít setup nhưng chất, trade ít mà chuẩn, tỷ lệ win tự nhiên khác hẳn. #trading #priceaction #forex #crypto #chungkhoan #traderlife

11

29 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC830 views3 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Đừng lao vào trade chỉ vì vài cú win đỏ mắt trên mạng. Thứ giữ được tài khoản trong game này là kỷ luật, không phải hên xui. – Hiểu đúng về rủi ro trước khi nghĩ tới lợi nhuận – Có kế hoạch quản lý vốn rõ ràng – Chấp nhận mất tiền là chuyện bình thường, mất kiểm soát mới là vấn đề – Không all-in, không gồng lỗ vô thức Trading không phải chỗ để thử vận may. Ai trụ được lâu mới là người thực sự kiếm được tiền. #trad

3

29 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC733 views10 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

8 câu hỏi bóc trần: bạn là trader thật hay chỉ là con mồi thanh khoản? • Bạn vào lệnh vì có setup rõ ràng hay vì FOMO, sợ lỡ sóng • Bạn hiểu mình đang trade cái gì, hay chỉ thấy “người ta vào nên vào theo” • Bạn có plan vào – ra lệnh cụ thể hay chờ thị trường “cứu” mỗi lần âm • Bạn quản lý vốn theo rule hay all-in theo cảm xúc • Bạn dám cắt lỗ đúng kịch bản hay cố gồng vì… hy vọng Tự trả lời thành thật, sẽ biết mìn

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @LeninTradecoinUnder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Jess Tản Mạn
@Jesstraining · 49,909
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lê Nin☭Admin TradeCoinUnderground” (@LeninTradecoinUnder), 12,997 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeninTradecoinUnder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.