Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The 17th Letter

Channel

The 17th Letter

@Letter_Q17

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,002subscribers

-1,447 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003700275342
TypeChannel
Username@Letter_Q17
Created26 January 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Letter_Q17

Growth

10,00211,44910,725.58 August 2026 — 11,449 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,246 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,966 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,706 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,542 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,557 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,499 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,488 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,389 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,358 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,332 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,289 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,204 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,164 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,139 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,109 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,108 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,071 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,042 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,002 subscribers8 August 20261 September 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -1,447. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,785–11,666 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:4610,002-16
31 Aug 2026, 04:2610,018-24
30 Aug 2026, 04:0710,042-29
29 Aug 2026, 03:0310,071-37
28 Aug 2026, 05:2610,108-1
27 Aug 2026, 01:5610,109-30
25 Aug 2026, 22:3710,139-25
25 Aug 2026, 01:1310,164-40
23 Aug 2026, 12:2810,204-44
22 Aug 2026, 02:0410,248-36
20 Aug 2026, 18:5810,284-5
19 Aug 2026, 19:0610,289-43
18 Aug 2026, 16:5510,332-26
17 Aug 2026, 19:5810,358-31
16 Aug 2026, 21:3510,389-99
15 Aug 2026, 15:2710,488-11
14 Aug 2026, 06:3610,499-58
13 Aug 2026, 01:3710,557+15
11 Aug 2026, 23:5310,542-164
11 Aug 2026, 00:1810,706first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
49.5%
avg views ÷ 10,002 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,950
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held18 (26 January 202628 August 2026)
Views total84,217
Reactions total6,218
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,218 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,36638.1%
🙏2,02132.5%
👍92014.8%
💯4957.96%
🔥1322.12%
👏1001.61%
🥰490.788%
🤔320.515%
❤‍🔥280.45%
😱160.257%
🎄120.193%
🤡100.161%
🫡100.161%
90.145%
👎70.113%
🕊50.08%
🙉30.048%
😁20.032%
🤯10.016%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC987 views103 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/Letter_Q17

62🙏27👍9🕊5

22 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC≈4,310 views412 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

RED ALERT🚨 - ALARM CONDITION‼️ SHARE IF YOU ARE READY! https://t.me/Letter_Q17

206👍98🙏91👏14🙉3

20 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC≈4,870 views723 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

SHARE IF YOU SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP AND THE AMERICAN MILITARY! https://t.me/Letter_Q17

412💯170🙏80👍54👎7

18 Aug 2026, 21:33 UTC≈10,100 views518 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ONLY A LITTLE TIME LEFT. This is the last sprint. The final stretch. We just have to hold on. Now, more than EVER, we need your support. Not likes. Not comments. SHARES. Share this like you’ve never shared anything before. Spread it everywhere. Every share counts. Every person who sees it matters. Don’t give up. We’re almost there. Just hold the line. TOGETHER UNTIL THE END. https://t.me/Letter_Q17

265🙏181👍38🥰24🤡10

15 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC≈7,730 views723 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ARE YOU READY? https://t.me/Letter_Q17

🙏357💯181103👍62🤔20

10 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈10,100 views888 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

TIME ⏰🌎 TO SHOCK THE WHOLE WORLD 🌎 BE AT ALERT 🧏🧏 THE TRUTH IS ABOUT TO BE EXPOSE 🌍 NOTHING CAN STOP WHAT'S COMING DO YOU BELIEVE THAT https://t.me/Letter_Q17

🙏486👍190130🔥45👏37

9 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTC≈8,950 views660 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Numbers don't lie. Everything is connected. https://t.me/Letter_Q17

424👍117🙏95🎄12🤔12

7 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈8,030 views550 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

STRONGER THAN EVER https://t.me/Letter_Q17

333🙏135👏35🥰25❤‍🔥22

7 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC≈5,910 views262 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

IT’S OVER https://t.me/Letter_Q17

👍121🙏97🔥20👏14🫡10

7 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC≈4,930 views245 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

And they know it. https://t.me/Letter_Q17

🙏14644👍40🔥14🤯1

7 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC≈3,960 views229 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

THE PUNISHMENT WILL COME! https://t.me/Letter_Q17

👍118💯55🔥2723❤‍🔥6

7 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC≈3,110 views221 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🌐 THE UNSEEN WAR IS BEING FOUGHT NOW For decades, the world was a stage play. Politicians, bankers, and media magnates moved like puppets while the real masters hid in the shadows. They told you wars were for oil. They told you markets crashed “by mistake.” They told you pandemics “just happened.” But they never told you about the true currency of power: 👉 Children. 👉 Human lives bought and sold in silence. https:

🙏123💯35👍2723🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Letter_Q17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 161,971 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The 17th Letter” (@Letter_Q17), 10,002 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Letter_Q17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.