Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 35 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,304–14,346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 07:19
14,309
-6
8 Sept 2026, 08:37
14,315
-7
5 Sept 2026, 02:55
14,322
+1
3 Sept 2026, 08:48
14,321
+4
2 Sept 2026, 04:34
14,317
+3
31 Aug 2026, 01:24
14,314
+1
30 Aug 2026, 00:05
14,313
-2
29 Aug 2026, 01:28
14,315
-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:33
14,316
-2
23 Aug 2026, 21:16
14,318
+3
22 Aug 2026, 07:57
14,315
-2
21 Aug 2026, 00:46
14,317
-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:24
14,318
+1
18 Aug 2026, 22:24
14,317
-5
17 Aug 2026, 22:27
14,322
-4
16 Aug 2026, 20:07
14,326
+3
15 Aug 2026, 07:17
14,323
-5
14 Aug 2026, 00:45
14,328
-1
12 Aug 2026, 15:33
14,329
-4
11 Aug 2026, 13:46
14,333
first reading
Engagement
353 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.47%
avg views ÷ 14,309 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,070
278 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
278
of 353 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 272 of 278 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
353 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
297,145
Reactions total
2,479
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 38m
Average length
35s
Measured directly from 269 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,355 reactions across 342 posts, in 46 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,095
32.6%
👍
742
22.1%
🔥
492
14.7%
❤🔥
181
5.39%
💩
180
5.37%
🤣
112
3.34%
🤡
68
2.03%
🥴
58
1.73%
🥱
44
1.31%
😁
42
1.25%
🥰
30
0.894%
🤯
29
0.864%
👎
28
0.835%
🤔
28
0.835%
👏
27
0.805%
👀
20
0.596%
😭
20
0.596%
🤨
17
0.507%
🙏
14
0.417%
🌭
13
0.387%
26 further kinds
115
3.43%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 343 of the 353 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 353 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Helena Hansen discussed the creation of Blighted Harbour, a creepy fantasy scene inspired by the River Styx in Greek mythology and developed as her first project in Blender.
Read the interview: https://80.lv/articles/building-a-creepy-3d-fantasy-environment-inspired-by-greek-mythology
NVIDIA has officially announced when DLSS 5 will launch on RTX 50 Series GPUs and shared more details about the technology, including its creative controls.
Be ready for a pretty big performance hit, though: https://80.lv/articles/nvidia-finally-announces-launch-date-for-its-controversial-dlss-5
Hirokazu Yokohara is working on a Blender add-on that randomly starts a game where you have to defend your model from attacks, or lose it if it takes damage.
Would you dare to try it?: https://80.lv/articles/this-blender-add-on-makes-you-defend-your-model-from-random-attacks
Make music come alive with Vizibeat, Andrea Carver's UE5 plug-in that creates vibrant animations from music and was used in Coachella productions.
Check out how it works: https://80.lv/articles/create-procedural-ue5-animations-based-on-music-with-this-tool
Check out Woofy Run, a chaotic multiplayer dog racing game where speed, strategy, and sabotage collide. Pick your favorite dog, set traps, dodge obstacles, and race to make the top 10 on every map!
Play now: https://store.steampowered.com/app/3847070/Woofy_Run/
The developers behind turn-based tactical roguelite Tile Crawl shared how they built a sphere out of hexes using an approach inspired by Animal Crossing.
Read: https://80.lv/articles/building-hexagon-sphere-using-animal-crossing-inspired-trick
Learn how Capcom used motion capture to animate monsters in the upcoming Onimusha: Way of the Sword.
Details: https://80.lv/articles/how-onimusha-way-of-the-sword-s-team-used-motion-capture-for-animating-monsters
Guillaume Scoffié shared a behind-the-scenes look at how he composited 2D layers into a 2.5D parallax animation for Shad Hottaboy's Summer Tour.
More 2.5D breakdowns: https://80.lv/articles/inside-the-making-of-2-5d-parallax-animation-for-music-artist
Learn GDScript From Zero, a free and open-source course from GDQuest, has received a major update.
Learn more: https://80.lv/articles/learn-gdscript-from-zero-course-gets-a-major-update
Take a look at this beautiful water shader from Beneath the Dying Sun, a sailing game by Raihan Erviansyah that feels a bit like DREDGE, but darker.
Details: https://80.lv/articles/beautiful-psx-style-water-for-dredge-like-game-but-scarier
Professional networking and portfolio platform Zerply is closing in September after 16 years of service.
Users have until then to export their data and redirect their profile links: https://80.lv/articles/zerply-is-closing-after-16-years
No Rest for the Wicked 1.0's release has been moved to 2027.
Read the details: https://80.lv/articles/no-rest-for-the-wicked-1-0-postponed-to-2027
👍18🤔3🤡2🤯2😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 353 posts we hold for @LevelEightyNews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@LevelEightyNews edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What do you think will be The Elder Scrolls 6's title, if it's limited to 8 characters?
Sentinel26%
Dominion33%
Skyrim 241%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 353 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CGPeers @Cg_peers · 69,306 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
CG Persia @CGPERS · 78,323 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 19 August 2026
GFX FATHER™ @graphicsfather · 68,632 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 20 August 2026
SECOND PILOTS | 3D | ANIMATION | Cg | Vfx | Motion | Blender | Houdini Fx | 2D @secondpilots_cg · 33,272 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Polygon @poly3ds · 35,347 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
CG Freelance @cgfreelance · 60,259 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“80 Level” (@LevelEightyNews), 14,309 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LevelEightyNews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.