Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -144. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,184–29,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:37
29,206
-12
17 Sept 2026, 05:37
29,218
+1
15 Sept 2026, 05:57
29,217
-4
13 Sept 2026, 16:21
29,221
-1
11 Sept 2026, 21:57
29,222
-11
9 Sept 2026, 09:18
29,233
+4
5 Sept 2026, 23:57
29,229
+10
3 Sept 2026, 17:59
29,219
-1
2 Sept 2026, 09:57
29,220
-9
1 Sept 2026, 06:45
29,229
-4
31 Aug 2026, 04:08
29,233
-7
30 Aug 2026, 06:48
29,240
+2
29 Aug 2026, 07:16
29,238
-5
28 Aug 2026, 06:26
29,243
-7
27 Aug 2026, 03:18
29,250
-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:34
29,251
+18
25 Aug 2026, 03:33
29,233
-4
23 Aug 2026, 23:16
29,237
-19
22 Aug 2026, 09:13
29,256
-15
20 Aug 2026, 21:34
29,271
first reading
Engagement
85 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 29,206 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,550
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 85 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
85 (30 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
186,590
Reactions total
7,237
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 07:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,890
Videos
≈473
Links
≈1,690
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
2m 02s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,865 reactions across 81 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
10,821
78.0%
👍
828
5.97%
❤🔥
701
5.06%
🕊
380
2.74%
👏
379
2.73%
👌
209
1.51%
😍
208
1.50%
🏆
101
0.728%
🥰
83
0.599%
😢
57
0.411%
😁
56
0.404%
💯
23
0.166%
🤩
19
0.137%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 84 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lezzatzendgi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 85 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سلام عرض ادب❤💐
👈در بی گمون👉
عرایضم بدون هیچ نیتی هست😑🙏
کدوماشو بگم؟
خرید موتور ۶۰۰ تومنی با ۲۰ تومن موجودی که نمیدونم بقیش چطوری پرداخت شده که تسویه شده😶چون در حقیقت پولی پرداخت نشده ولی تسویه شده...
خونه ای که سر سالش با مبلغی که درتوانم بود و کم تر از عرف ارزشش تمدید میشه و صاحب خونه میگه من نمیخوام اذیتت کنم همونی که داری بده اجاره هم اضاف نکن
فرزندی که با مادرش یه زمانی کشمکش داشتم ولی با میل مادرش میاد و اصلا نا…
سلام خدمت ادمین محترم و آقای قویدل بزرگوار
ما قبلاً که در آموزه های جهان مادی بودیم و با ذهن میرفتیم جلو و شکر خدا هیچ کدوم از خواسته ها هم اتفاق نمیافتاد در اون زمان با چیدمان ذهنی حساب کتاب کرده بودیم که تا یک سال بعد خونه میخریم و شرایط خوب میشه به واسطه ی شغل پردرآمد و آدمی که اومده و به ما کمک کنه🤭 خلاصه به همین دلایل کذایی رفتیم یه خونه برای یک سال اجاره کردیم در بیرون شهر و نگم براتون که چقدر زجر و سختی رو ب…
#سعید_قویدل
شنیدین از مادری، مادر بزرگی که:
" مادر الهی خدا از در بی گمون برات برسونه "
کار زندگی، از در بی گمونه،
هر جا از سبب سازی ذهنت دست برداشتی، ساکت شدی، آروم شدی
مَن مَن نکردی،
زندگی به جای تو انجامش میده...
کانال تلگرامی ما :
https://t.me/Lezzatzendgi
دوست داری بازم از این نوع پست ها ببینی 👇
http://Www.instagram.com/saeedghavidel.official
http://Www.instagram.com/saeedghavidel.official2
…
بله،زیاد، وقتی کاری انجام دادم و نتیجه رو رها کردم34%
بله ،یه زمان هایی بوده، کلا رها کردم اون مساله رو، و گفتم نمیدونم، نمی تونم و شد61%
نه بابا این چرت و پرتا چیه! 🙄9%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
واقعا از همه جا بریده بودم دیگر هیچ امیدی به هیچ کس و هیچ چیز نداشتم...در اوج نا امیدی معجزه ای اتفاق افتاد یه لحظه این ویدئو خود بخود اومد جلو چشام ،بعد از ۱۰ بار گوش کردن انگار مرحمی شد بر روی زخمام، خودبه خود گریه ام بد جوری گرفت همون جا تکیه دادم به دیوار...زار زار گریه گردم رفتم خونه تا صبح به این ویدئو استاد خوش قلبم درگیر بودم .
همه چی رو برای همیشه سپردم به خدا و گفتم دیگه از دست من چیزی بر نمیاد و به اختیار…
#سعید_قویدل
" وقتی تنها امیدت من شدم..
مرا خواهی دید..
بفرست برای هر کی که ناامیده😭
https://t.me/Lezzatzendgi
⚜️ برگزاری کلاس های آموزشی آنلاين
برای تهیه این دوره های آموزشی و ثبت نام به لینک زیر، کلمه ی
" آنلاين " رو ارسال بفرمائید
https://t.me/alizadehadminn
#سعید_قویدل
" وقتی تنها امیدت، من شدم..
مرا خواهی دید...
بفرست برای هر کی ناامیده 😭
کانال تلگرامی ما :
https://t.me/Lezzatzendgi
دوست داری بازم از این نوع پست ها ببینی 👇
http://Www.instagram.com/saeedghavidel.official
http://Www.instagram.com/saeedghavidel.official2
شرح قوانین زندگی با آموزه های مولانا، دوست دارید بالای 200 جلسه ی رایگان
رو ببینید و بشنوید
بزنید روی این لینک 👇
https://www.youtube.co…
❤🔥83❤58🕊11😢5👌4🏆1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @Lezzatzendgi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بله،زیاد، وقتی کاری انجام دادم و نتیجه رو رها کردم34%
بله ،یه زمان هایی بوده، کلا رها کردم اون مساله رو، و گفتم نمیدونم، نمی تونم و شد61%
نه بابا این چرت و پرتا چیه! 🙄9%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🫠 سلام نازنینانم یه سوالی...
شما برای چه منظوری توی این کانال هستید؟ چی میخوایید، چه انتظاری دارید از این آموزه ها؟
برای اینکه خسته شدم از رنج و درد22%
برای رشد و رسیدن به اصل خودم58%
برای برکت معنوی و مالی10%
برای اینکه رابطه ام با همسرم یا دوستم خوب بشه4%
مریضم و میخوام بیماریم از بین بره3%
بچم حرف گوش نمیده، میخوام درست بشه1%
برای رسیدن به بهترین های خودم، برای باز پس گیری سلطنتم، آخه من اشرف مخلوقاتم30%
The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
جزئیات دوره های خودشناسی، تجربیات و پیام های شما @sharhedoreha · 15,333#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فراز قورچیان | ذهن قدرتمند @manehaghighi · 95,891 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 1 September 2026
کاتب @Sri_veka · 34,186 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 September 2026
ً در مسیر نور 🕊 @Darmasire_noor · 25,618 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
خانواده صمیمی عباس منش @abasmanesh · 37,171 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 September 2026
روانشناسی (پذیرش) @PAZIRESH_LIFE · 36,437 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
persian _innerpeace @persian_inerpeace · 27,248 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دروس مولانا با سعید قویدل(لذت زندگی)” (@Lezzatzendgi), 29,206 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lezzatzendgi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.