Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Licli Cuba 2007

Channel

Licli Cuba 2007

@LicviPine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

57subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003737974274
TypeChannel
Username@LicviPine
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 15 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LicviPine

Growth

5763606 August 2026 — 63 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61 subscribers5 September 2026 — 58 subscribers13 September 2026 — 57 subscribers6 August 202613 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 38 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 11:1857-1
5 Sept 2026, 15:3658-3
28 Aug 2026, 22:5361-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:1663no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:0463first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

117 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😎2420.5%
2117.9%
🍓2117.9%
custom 52472383137686639301714.5%
custom 520218696728186240265.13%
💘65.13%
🎅54.27%
custom 520192949687736794843.42%
custom 520214309848589980443.42%
custom 520203316450299204632.56%
custom 520204287112908240632.56%
custom 544956847641700358432.56%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LicviPine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @Slaat0sPhoto

❗❗🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❗❗❗ ‼️🔶🔶➖1️⃣0️⃣ 🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 2️⃣3️⃣➖5️⃣9️⃣‼️ Поторопись, шанс есть у каждого! Всем участникам – удачи! 🌟Слатс~ 💘 Ребятки, вы этого очень хотели и вот, наконец-то долгожданный летний розыгрыш от меня!🥳 🍷На этот раз у вас есть уникальная возможность выбрать любой мерч из ассортимента на выделенную сумму ⭐️, А именно: Первое место: 🐚🐚🐚🐚 Второе место:🐚🐚🐚🐚 Что же нужно сделать, чтобы принять участие?) Слатс~ 🏖В

12 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC75 views8 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

КАК ПОЯВИЛСЯ ПЕЙРИНГ АЛИАЗО × МАФИНЕВ???????

😎8

11 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC74 views13 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 чарли, спасибо за звёздочку!!

😎53🍓2💘2🎅1

5 Jul 2026, 13:58 UTC68 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @anya_pro1333Photo

🐠 . 🪧 . . . 🪽 🌟 – @anya_pro1333 ! 🌟 – @CMETAHA_BKYCHA ! 🌟 – @Caesar_is_here ! 🌟 – @LicviPine ! 🌟 – @ywelkaArt ! 🌟 – @deltawho ! 🌟 – @feiiz_z ! спасибо что поучаствовали в коллабе ! 🤩 . отдельное ОГРОМНОЕ спасибо КАРАСЮ , что помог с фонами !!!

5🍓2😎2🎅1💘1

23 Jun 2026, 15:28 UTC162 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

1 кр :: @chmonea 2 кр :: @Kornytetoby спсс за звёздочки слатс и великий аноним😚 айм соу факед хеппи

🍓42💘1😎1custom 52019294968773679481custom 52020428711290824061custom 52021430984858998041custom 52021869672818624021

22 Jun 2026, 21:00 UTC712 views22 reactions11 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

⏰В Мск уже новый день... 🔹🔹А значит милюзге исполняется 🌟🌟 лет 🚬 🌟🍿 — за этот год я зачем-то вышла в косплей, кф и мерч. в этих же сферах нашла крутых ребят. по стилю рисовашек, ну хз, но вроде чуть подросла. с моей стороны эта разница никогда не будет ощутимой🌟 Я оч ценю людей, которые прожили со мной этот год и столько историй, спс 🥺 А репост работ — лучший подарок для рисоваки... Да и просто если напишете пару сло

🍓74😎2custom 52472383137686639302🎅1💘1custom 52019294968773679481custom 52020428711290824061

18 Jun 2026, 19:13 UTC137 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

градиент возродился на др моего брата.

😎2

17 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC170 views31 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

тв:: чутьчуть кровь

custom 5247238313768663930116🍓3🎅2😎2custom 52019294968773679482💘1custom 52020428711290824061

16 Jun 2026, 13:12 UTC107 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

пожалуйста, хватит оскать моего папу и говорить, что он в стиралке, бляь.

custom 52020331645029920463custom 52021869672818624023custom 52472383137686639301

15 Jun 2026, 18:24 UTC112 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026

СПУСТЯ ПОЛТОРА ГОДА У МЕНЯ СНОВА РАБОТАЕТ ГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ ПЛАНШЕТ. Я БОЛЬШЕ НЕ БУЛУ РИСОВАТЬ МЫШКОЙ

🍓3😎2custom 524723831376866393021custom 52021430984858998041custom 54495684764170035841

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LicviPine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Licli Cuba 2007” (@LicviPine), 57 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LicviPine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.