❗❗🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩❗❗❗ ‼️🔶🔶➖1️⃣0️⃣ 🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶🔶 2️⃣3️⃣➖5️⃣9️⃣‼️ Поторопись, шанс есть у каждого! Всем участникам – удачи! 🌟Слатс~ 💘 Ребятки, вы этого очень хотели и вот, наконец-то долгожданный летний розыгрыш от меня!🥳 🍷На этот раз у вас есть уникальная возможность выбрать любой мерч из ассортимента на выделенную сумму ⭐️, А именно: Первое место: 🐚🐚🐚🐚 Второе место:🐚🐚🐚🐚 Что же нужно сделать, чтобы принять участие?) Слатс~ 🏖В…

Channel
Licli Cuba 2007
@LicviPine
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
57subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003737974274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LicviPine |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LicviPine |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 57 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 15:36 | 58 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 61 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 63 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 63 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
117 reactions across 9 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😎 | 24 | 20.5% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 17.9% | |
| 🍓 | 21 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5247238313768663930 | 17 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5202186967281862402 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 5.13% | |
| 🎅 | 5 | 4.27% | |
| custom 5201929496877367948 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5202143098485899804 | 4 | 3.42% | |
| custom 5202033164502992046 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5202042871129082406 | 3 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5449568476417003584 | 3 | 2.56% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 16
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 10 we hold a reading for · 40%
- Most on one post
- 11
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LicviPine. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
КАК ПОЯВИЛСЯ ПЕЙРИНГ АЛИАЗО × МАФИНЕВ???????
😎8
🤩 чарли, спасибо за звёздочку!!
😎5❤3🍓2💘2🎅1
🐠 . 🪧 . . . 🪽 🌟 – @anya_pro1333 ! 🌟 – @CMETAHA_BKYCHA ! 🌟 – @Caesar_is_here ! 🌟 – @LicviPine ! 🌟 – @ywelkaArt ! 🌟 – @deltawho ! 🌟 – @feiiz_z ! спасибо что поучаствовали в коллабе ! 🤩 . отдельное ОГРОМНОЕ спасибо КАРАСЮ , что помог с фонами !!!
❤5🍓2😎2🎅1💘1
1 кр :: @chmonea 2 кр :: @Kornytetoby спсс за звёздочки слатс и великий аноним😚 айм соу факед хеппи
🍓4❤2💘1😎1custom 52019294968773679481custom 52020428711290824061custom 52021430984858998041custom 52021869672818624021
Live stream finished (24 minutes)
⏰В Мск уже новый день... 🔹🔹А значит милюзге исполняется 🌟🌟 лет 🚬 🌟🍿 — за этот год я зачем-то вышла в косплей, кф и мерч. в этих же сферах нашла крутых ребят. по стилю рисовашек, ну хз, но вроде чуть подросла. с моей стороны эта разница никогда не будет ощутимой🌟 Я оч ценю людей, которые прожили со мной этот год и столько историй, спс 🥺 А репост работ — лучший подарок для рисоваки... Да и просто если напишете пару сло…
🍓7❤4😎2custom 52472383137686639302🎅1💘1custom 52019294968773679481custom 52020428711290824061
Live stream started
градиент возродился на др моего брата.
😎2
тв:: чутьчуть кровь
custom 524723831376866393011❤6🍓3🎅2😎2custom 52019294968773679482💘1custom 52020428711290824061
пожалуйста, хватит оскать моего папу и говорить, что он в стиралке, бляь.
custom 52020331645029920463custom 52021869672818624023custom 52472383137686639301
СПУСТЯ ПОЛТОРА ГОДА У МЕНЯ СНОВА РАБОТАЕТ ГРАФИЧЕСКИЙ ПЛАНШЕТ. Я БОЛЬШЕ НЕ БУЛУ РИСОВАТЬ МЫШКОЙ
🍓3😎2custom 52472383137686639302❤1custom 52021430984858998041custom 54495684764170035841
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @LicviPine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Caesar_is_here · 1211 postdorinac0la
@dorinacola · 491 post✧₊ faryaa 🍇
@faryaato · 4711 postБлендер//
@killingpplislegal · 9691 post🍒лиреди и ее рисовашки🍒
@leeredie_art · 2331 post[ПЕРЕЕЗД]Куба плачет [Ликли/🦥]
@liclinivica · 501 postломпик🍒|полурест
@lompickk · 2161 postMoon_A
@Moon_April4 · 391 postПаника артс
@Panicaarts · 201 postСили ´ˎ˗
@siliyeps · 1521 postskycie1!!>_<
@skycie11 · 581 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@anya_pro1333 · 2231 postРест | бебебе Цезарь🛸
@Caesar_is_here · 1211 postСиська пива 28
@chmonea · 461 post+🖊️•Вкусная_сметанка°📃+
@CMETAHA_BKYCHA · 871 postДельта ааааа !
@Deltawho · 2591 postОкей Рэди
@feiiz_z · 6391 postкарась хухря
@karkas_3 · 721 postАнонимные вопросы
@voprosy · 1,287,3361 postРест Ⲩⲃⲉⲗⲕⲁ ⲕⲁⲱⲁ
@ywelkaArt · 351 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@LicviPine named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 18 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Licli Cuba 2007” (@LicviPine), 57 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LicviPine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.