Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 黎黎❤️朋友圈

Channel

黎黎❤️朋友圈

@Lili0537

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

252subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003907582155
TypeChannel
Username@Lili0537
Created5 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lili0537

Growth

2352572468 August 2026 — 235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 235 subscribers9 August 2026 — 249 subscribers15 August 2026 — 254 subscribers23 August 2026 — 257 subscribers7 September 2026 — 251 subscribers14 September 2026 — 252 subscribers2528 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 232–260 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 16:21252+1
7 Sept 2026, 02:56251-6
23 Aug 2026, 19:18257+3
15 Aug 2026, 17:46254+5
9 Aug 2026, 06:41249+14
8 Aug 2026, 10:02235no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:18235first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4s
Average length
4s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC958 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

莆田老师体验报告: https://t.me/putianlsj 各花入各眼,每一朵鲜花都有耀眼的时刻,需要我们发现她的美。出击感受仅代表个人喜好以及观点,请各位自行斟酌考量❗️ 『总体评级』:S 【日期】:8.7 【验证人】:pk 【联系方式】:@ptlili0 【地 区 】:莆田 【颜值/打扮】:10 【身材曲线】:10 【服务水平】:8 【水费】:800p 【体型】:是我爱的细枝结硕果 【皮肤】:皮肤貌美,丝滑无瑕疵 【详情】:进门一看高颜值,大长腿,模特身材,看一眼就非日不可的选手,胸前挺着一对大杀器,要颜要身材要情绪要服务统统满足你,颜值高,嫩出水,冲就对了,不要问我为什么 【妹子优点】:做爱反馈特强烈,滋滋冒水 【妹子缺点】:嗯嗯啊啊~~~123结束,缺点是恨我自己不多桩一会儿 【推荐指数】⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️(最高五星)

1

7 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC556 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ptpc008Photo

【老师艺名】:黎黎 【验证老表】:PTPC队长 【验证时间】:8月 【大概位置】:莆田 【修车水费】:800 【联系方式】:@ptlili0 【身高体重】:165/95左右 【目测年龄】:22-24 【湿度紧度】:包裹不错,日俩下就滋滋冒水! 【人照相似】:9 【凶器罩杯】:大D 底部有垫 【皮肤情况】:皮肤挺光滑,无瑕疵,无赘肉 【老师态度】:挺好玩的一个妹子,不过分要求都可以满足,互动也挺好的 【老师缺点】:无亲无蛇,这颜值不给亲我好难受,花胸,不过挺帅的。 【老师优点】:颜值高,身材好,前凸后翘,既温柔又好玩,能乳交(成也胸败也胸也),做爱反馈刚日有点矜持,日爽了会自己摸豆豆,越日越骚。 【老师口活】:口的不错,也会舔蛋蛋,也挺久的。 【修车过程】: 根据我方泉州第一手情报得知; “这个可嘟” “收到” 颜值高,简单三件套,聊天不尬,相处氛围可以,没日之前觉得还好,越日越久老师欲望上来性张力爆发,刚开始还跟我装矜持呢,

7 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H178601737630 🎰 少御颜值暴击,黎黎莆田首开! ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 黎黎老师初来乍到,等莆田表哥来疼爱 7号见喔~ 活动有效期:1天(中奖报告奉上) 本活动最终解释权归老师所有 💁 参与人数:206人 🎅 联系领奖:@ptlili0 1. 陈 陈 奖品:1P半价卷 2. 霸吧(不爱版) 奖品:优惠卷200 3. 南天门 奖品:优惠卷200 祝大家心想事成好运连连!

6 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈1,560 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

莆田吃好老师,就来5235群https://t.me/ptpt5235

1

6 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,580 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🎰 少御颜值暴击,黎黎莆田首开! 📮 参与条件: 🎫 加入-黎黎❤️朋友圈 🎫 加入-队长的工作日报 🎫 加入-🅟🅣PC·舔狗帮【群星汇】🔞 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 1P半价卷 × 1 💰️ 优惠卷200 × 2 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 黎黎老师初来乍到,等莆田表哥来疼爱 7号见喔~ 活动有效期:1天(中奖报告奉上) 本活动最终解释权归老师所有 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年08月07日 14时00分00秒

1

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Lili0537. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“黎黎❤️朋友圈” (@Lili0537), 252 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lili0537.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.