Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лина Винчестер💜

Channel

Лина Винчестер💜

@Lina_Winchester

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,555subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001685562646
TypeChannel
Username@Lina_Winchester
Created13 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lina_Winchester

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,48011,61311,546.56 August 2026 — 11,580 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,613 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,579 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,575 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,574 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,569 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,568 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,572 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,558 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,555 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,541 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,542 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,538 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,524 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,513 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,510 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,502 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,492 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,486 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,480 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,497 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,555 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,554 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,546 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,555 subscribers11,5556 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,460–11,633 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:1811,555+9
17 Sept 2026, 04:5711,546-8
15 Sept 2026, 03:3911,554-1
13 Sept 2026, 15:5511,555+58
11 Sept 2026, 22:3811,497+17
9 Sept 2026, 12:0111,480-6
3 Sept 2026, 20:5711,486-6
2 Sept 2026, 09:3611,492-10
1 Sept 2026, 06:2611,502-8
31 Aug 2026, 03:2511,510-3
30 Aug 2026, 03:3411,513-11
29 Aug 2026, 00:4811,524-14
28 Aug 2026, 02:1711,538-4
27 Aug 2026, 04:4911,542-5
25 Aug 2026, 04:0711,547+6
23 Aug 2026, 23:5511,541-4
22 Aug 2026, 06:2911,545-1
20 Aug 2026, 20:0811,546-5
19 Aug 2026, 18:5811,551-4
18 Aug 2026, 16:4711,555first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 11,555 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held73 (30 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total60,591
Reactions total9,325
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25,558 reactions across 68 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,18435.9%
custom 52244277725243769765,26920.6%
🤣3,59714.1%
❤‍🔥1,4575.70%
custom 53304006917793046411,4225.56%
💘1,3015.09%
🔥1,2654.95%
😁7252.84%
🍓6472.53%
😍1180.462%
🥰970.38%
😭920.36%
😈750.293%
🎄670.262%
🤝620.243%
💯410.16%
🤯410.16%
🦄300.117%
💔260.102%
120.047%
5 further kinds300.117%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,486 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 73 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lina_Winchester. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.74%
2 of 73 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
2,740
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,890
over 71 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFHvqZay120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFJeHBAZ17 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC651 views78 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Извините, это я комикс генерю, не туда кинула ахахаха Ps: Теперь еще и комикс опубликовала в половину второго ночи, хотя собиралась кинуть в отложку на утро... Пора спать, шуток про перевернутый календарь не будет 🤣

🤣50💘21custom 53304006917793046416😈1

2 Sept 2026, 19:11 UTC≈1,150 views262 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Персонажи букв Севера и их любимые фильмы ❣️ С кем проведете киновечер? 🍿

custom 5224427772524376976156😁52custom 5330400691779304641336❤‍🔥5💘4😎4🍓2

2 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTC≈1,970 views151 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

📚 Покупаете ли вы бумажные книги?

  1. Да, уже ставить некуда, подарите мне новый стеллаж60%
  2. Нет, дорого2%
  3. Редко12%
  4. Беру только если очень понравилась в электронке24%
  5. Читаю только электронные7%
  6. Беру книги только автопокупаемых авторов17%
  7. Я читаю пиратки и что вы мне сделаете?5%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

90custom 533040069177930464126custom 522442777252437697625😈7🍓3

2 Sept 2026, 07:48 UTC≈4,200 views413 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Posted without readable text

262❤‍🔥56custom 533040069177930464154custom 522442777252437697617🔥10💘7🍓5💔2

1 Sept 2026, 08:59 UTC≈2,380 views381 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🍂 #чат911

🤣272custom 522442777252437697660custom 53304006917793046413310❤‍🔥5🍓1

31 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC≈2,460 views377 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💙Первая буква Севера💙 💙Читать на Литрес 💙Предзаказ в Читай-городе

228🔥67🍓38custom 522442777252437697618❤‍🔥15custom 53304006917793046417💘4

31 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,440 views386 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💘 У тебя новое сообщение! я обожаю ваше творчество,даже маме все мозги съела из-за своей любимой дилогии.а на др мама сделала такой вот сюрприз!! Извините, это что за шок-восторг такой!!! 😐😐 У вас потрясающая мама 😭

234🔥72❤‍🔥53custom 522442777252437697612💘6custom 53304006917793046416🍓2😍1

31 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC≈2,330 views238 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Остальные ответы на вопросы будут в комментариях❤️

custom 5224427772524376976153custom 533040069177930464131🦄25❤‍🔥96🔥6🥰3💔2

31 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈2,220 views222 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Я вас так люблю 💔 Спасибо большое 😭❤️

custom 5224427772524376976147💘33custom 533040069177930464126🔥7🍓53❤‍🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈2,260 views224 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💗 Если хотите задать вопрос, похвалить или анонимно написать гадость, то давайте попробуем такой формат: 😄 t.me/voprosy?start=59wag

126❤‍🔥37custom 533040069177930464130😁11💘8😈6🍓3custom 52244277725243769763

31 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈2,090 views301 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Мои попытки уснуть ни к чему не приводят, за дверью слышен вой ветра, он будто проник в дом и со свистом гуляет по стенам. Стараясь не думать о том, что происходит на улице, я сосредотачиваюсь на профиле Ника. Он дышит ровно, словно совсем не волнуется, челка спадает на лоб, он прикусывает губу и покачивает головой, когда проигрывает уровень в «Кэнди краш». «Зачем ты такой красивый?» — проносится в моей голове.

190💘49custom 522442777252437697649🍓4🔥4custom 53304006917793046414❤‍🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,130 views110 reactionsread 1 September 2026

❤️ Тут сегодня итоги

71custom 522442777252437697620💘14🍓5

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @Lina_Winchester. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 09:16 UTCAnonymous Poll1,170 voters approx.

📚 Покупаете ли вы бумажные книги?

  1. Да, уже ставить некуда, подарите мне новый стеллаж60%
  2. Нет, дорого2%
  3. Редко12%
  4. Беру только если очень понравилась в электронке24%
  5. Читаю только электронные7%
  6. Беру книги только автопокупаемых авторов17%
  7. Я читаю пиратки и что вы мне сделаете?5%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Trendbooks 📖 книги YA
@clevertrendbooks · 61,605
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
DARYANEMK/Книжный блог
@daryanemk · 70,405
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
Анна Джейн | Твоё сердце будет того
@anna_jane · 84,684
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лина Винчестер💜” (@Lina_Winchester), 11,555 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lina_Winchester.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.