Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Linda Raymond's Blog

Channel

Linda Raymond's Blog

@Lindaraymond

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

12subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003921134894
TypeChannel
Username@Lindaraymond
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 23 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lindaraymond

Growth

812109 August 2026 — 8 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12 subscribers9 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–13 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 18:1612+1
24 Aug 2026, 16:5611+3
12 Aug 2026, 14:168no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:168first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1324.5%
👀611.3%
👨‍💻47.55%
👻35.66%
👾35.66%
😁35.66%
😭35.66%
😱35.66%
🔥23.77%
😢23.77%
🤔23.77%
🤗23.77%
🥰23.77%
🍾11.89%
🐳11.89%
😴11.89%
🙏11.89%
🤪11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC8 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Почему все так шутят!? Джеф только что стебал меня почти так же!

😭3

8 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC12 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Это вы когда Мембрейн проходит мимо? Да с чего вы взяли.... 😮‍💨

👀3🤪1

6 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дни протягиваются дольше чем обычно, забавно что это происходит тогда когда лаборатория руководит "сама собой". Для меня это плоховато, я люблю суматоху и занятость рук, а с кучей свободного времени (из за доделанных проектов и отсутствия заданий, ибо все дэдлайны сделаны) остаётся только посвещать себя сборке устройств которые я сама давно хотела собрать 😒

👨‍💻2

26 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC25 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Босс опять уснул за рабочим столом 😂 Но после той фотографии что мы выложили ему в профиль теперь нельзя делать фотки пока он спит.. А то штрафанут.

4😴1

23 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC29 viewsread 12 August 2026

И еще извиняюсь, только сейчас появилось время чем-то поделиться. 😆 Мы сейчас на весьма большом слёте ученых с Боссом и парочкой моих коллег. Да, ранее переговоры велись через мониторы, но живая встреча понадобилась для подписания соглашений и бумаг о сотрудничестве. Благо хоть номер нам сняли для ночлега, хоть он и на трех человек сразу. 😵

23 Jul 2026, 19:14 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

Как бы вы отнеслись, если профессор мембрейн чисто гипотетически признался к вам в любви? Если он признается в любви, то только госпоже сия науке, лол. 😆 И с чего вы вообще мне такие вопросы задаёте!?

16 Jul 2026, 21:21 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Что важнее в мужчине, грудь, задница или душа? Что простите...? К чему такие вопросы? Зачем??? 😨😨😨 (Кстати! Я решила переделать систему ответов! А то никакой анонимности, никнеймы видно😆 Простити))

👀2🤗1

13 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC44 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

КТО ЭТО ЕМУ НАПИСАЛ!? РЕБЯТ, НЕ СТАВЬТЕ МЕНЯ В НЕЛОВКОЕ ПОЛОЖЕНИЕ! 👹 (Слава науке он тугодум)

3🤗1😱1

10 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC43 viewsread 12 August 2026

Когда мы с ребятами у него тусовались, Д.ж. говорил что ненавидит брейнрот и ии слоп... 😮‍💨

10 Jul 2026, 20:16 UTC40 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ха-хааа Профессора атакуют сикссевен шутки 😆😆😆 Какой кошмар, он сидит уже весь взвинченный от злости

😁3

10 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чувак блин, я знаю ты меня младше, но не настолько что бы шутить про сикссевен 😵

2

10 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC36 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

О, вы знаете Джефа? А, ну конечно, он в чате лаборатории главная сплетница, я не удивлюсь если он в интернете сидит чаще чем я 😒 Я вообще общаюсь только с джефом и мэттом, но работником №1 всегда будет Мембран. И.. И не потому что вы что то надумали! Он делает больше чем все мы! ☺️ А.. Нелюбимый работник это тот уже уволенный трыч по вине которого я ноги лешилась.. Не помню как его уже звали. Вольт.. Ватт.. Какая ра

👻3👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Lindaraymond. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Linda Raymond's Blog” (@Lindaraymond), 12 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lindaraymond.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.