一个创业者如果每天都要花时间解决情绪的问题,那便是被筛掉的那群人
🤡1

Channel
@LingXianAI
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,727subscribers
-8,980 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002452629134 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @LingXian @LingXianAI |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 43 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LingXianAI |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:36 | 6,727 | -15 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 6,742 | -245 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:05 | 6,987 | -11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 6,998 | -1,497 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 8,495 | -371 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 8,866 | -1,433 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 10,299 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 10,299 | -332 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 10,631 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 10,631 | -53 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 10,684 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 10,684 | -71 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 10,755 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:32 | 10,755 | -12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 10,767 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:12 | 10,771 | -58 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 10,829 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 10,829 | -113 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 10,942 | no change |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 10,942 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,001 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😍 | 248 | 12.4% | |
| 🥰 | 248 | 12.4% | |
| 🤩 | 239 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 233 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 220 | 11.0% | |
| ❤ | 211 | 10.5% | |
| 🎉 | 209 | 10.4% | |
| 💯 | 202 | 10.1% | |
| 🔥 | 189 | 9.45% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.05% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,001 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
一个创业者如果每天都要花时间解决情绪的问题,那便是被筛掉的那群人
🤡1
如果你不知道怎么用 ai,那你就发给 ai 这句话: 我有严重的智力障碍,你不需要询问我的意见,你看着处理就好了,不要问我,我也看不懂啊,我只要结果。
👍2
进群审核 联系 @fushao @fuwuo
于7.27 付费加入群组的用户 可以联系 @wuwuwu 双倍退款 或保留门票 后续门票开放为1888U 原先群组将作为隐私大群开放
✅ 领先社区 ✅ 🔥 Claude Opus 5|新一代旗舰 AI Anthropic 目前最强旗舰模型之一,核心提升集中在 编程、复杂推理、AI Agent 与长任务执行。 ⚡️ 编程能力:大型项目开发、重构、Debug、多文件修改更强 🧠 复杂推理:面对高难度、陌生问题,分析与决策能力进一步提升 🤖 Agent 能力:可自主读项目 → 分析 → 修改 → 测试 → 修复,连续完成复杂任务 📚 长任务处理:更适合大型代码库、复杂业务逻辑与专业工作流 🚀 Fast Mode:兼顾旗舰级能力与更快响应速度 💰 API 价格:输入 $5 / 百万 Tokens|输出 $25 / 百万 Tokens 一句话概括: Opus 5 不只是“帮你写代码”,而是进一步向能够独立完成复杂开发任务的 AI 工程师靠近。 适合:Claude Code / Cursor / 大型项目开发 / 架构设计 / Agent 自动化 / 疑难 Bug …
Posted without readable text
领先社区自助入口 @LingXianPayBot
Live stream finished (8 minutes)
Live stream started
Live stream finished (6 minutes)
Live stream started
社区进群188U/位 本群割韭菜 不发放任何福利! 讨口子谨慎 不退款! @wuwuwu
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @LingXianAI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“领先科技社区|AIGC|Chatgpt|AIBBS” (@LingXianAI), 6,727 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LingXianAI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.