Channel
@Litra_sotka_100
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 15 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003774132897 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Litra_sotka_100 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Litra_sotka_100 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 66 | +15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 51 | +20 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:22 | 31 | no change |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:47 | 31 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 October 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,688 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня для вас плохая новость… 😔 ОСТАЛСЯ 1 ДЕНЬ ДО ПОВЫШЕНИЯ ЦЕН! Вот что даёт платформа, пока ты думаешь: 🔹 4 предмета по цене одного. Если сдаёшь несколько экзаменов — это в разы выгоднее, чем платить за каждый отдельно 🔹 В 1,5–2 раза дешевле других платформ. Это не наши слова — это сравнение с ТОП-5 компаниями по подготовке! 🔹 Ты выбираешь преподавателя под себя. На каждом предмете есть 2–3 преподавателя. Не по…
Правильный ответ: «Преступление и наказание» 🪓 А теперь задай себе вопрос: сколько произведений ты сможешь так же легко разгадать на экзамене? Во время подготовки со мной мы разбираем все произведения из кодификатора - понятно, интересно и качественно, раскладывая все по полочкам твоей памяти И у тебя остается всего один день, чтобы залететь на крутую подготовку по литре по сниженной цене. Жми на смайлик, чтобы н…
Угадай произведение по эмодзи 🪓👨🌾👵🐴 Подсказка: это есть в кодификаторе ЕГЭ по литературе Пиши свою версию в комментариях, а я поделюсь с тобой секретом, который поможет тебе залутать высокие баллы на ЕГЭ по литературе 👇
Даже настоящий ревизор бы заплакал, если бы упустил шанс начать подготовку к ЕГЭ по литературе по выгодной цене Ему бы точно не помешала подготовка с индивидуальной программой, ударным режимом перед экзаменами, пробниками с индивидуальной проверкой и классными призами за качественную подготовку Не будь как ревизор – не упускай свой шанс ⚡️
Мем, который порадовал меня сегодня А знаете что еще порадовало меня и скорее всего, порадует вас? Инфа о том, что у вас еще есть возможность забрать самую продуктивную подготовку к ЕГЭ по литературе вместе со мной по сниженной цене ⚡️
❤1
🫂Учебная платформа снова работает! На данный момент работа платформы восстановлена. Если у вас всё ещё возникают проблемы с доступом к сайту или в уроках отсутствуют материалы, не переживайте — всё это постепенно восстанавливается. Совсем скоро всё вернётся в привычный режим! 🙌 Спасибо за ваше терпение и понимание! 💙
ОЙ, Я УПАЛА Ну, то есть, платформа, упала, но перед этим передала мне важную инфу⚡️ Если ты хочешь быть в курсе всех апдейтов по ситуации и первым вернуться к подготовке – подпишись на нашу рассылку Там будут новости по доступу к эфирам, теориям и материалам: ВК — https://vk.ru/club220062690 ТГ — @sotkasotkabot ❤️ – если подписался на рассылку, но все еще заходишь и проверяешь сайт каждые 10 минут
к посту выше!
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Litra_sotka_100. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Настя Литра | Литература ЕГЭ | Сотка” (@Litra_sotka_100), 66 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Litra_sotka_100.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.