Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ارتش سرخ لیورپول | RED ARMY

Channel

ارتش سرخ لیورپول | RED ARMY

@Liverpoolredarmyfans1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

49,219subscribers

+6,587 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003186545387
TypeChannel
Username@Liverpoolredarmyfans1
Description🔴بزرگترین کانال و فعال ترین طرفداری لیورپول در ایران🔴 تعصب، ایمان و افتخار؛ سه‌گانه‌ای که باخت نمی‌شناسه 💪 🗣️ Ccommunication : @LiverpoolBlood1 چنل توییت : @AnfieldFrame چنل گل : @redarmygoal ⚔️ 21:21:22 | You’ll Never Walk Alone
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Liverpoolredarmyfans1

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

40,22653,04746,636.57 August 2026 — 42,632 subscribers8 August 2026 — 42,403 subscribers9 August 2026 — 42,129 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,263 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,730 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,703 subscribers14 August 2026 — 43,127 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41,400 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,008 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,540 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,226 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,968 subscribers21 August 2026 — 46,689 subscribers23 August 2026 — 46,318 subscribers24 August 2026 — 45,899 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,614 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,324 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,125 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,074 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,230 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,775 subscribers31 August 2026 — 47,462 subscribers1 September 2026 — 47,081 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,648 subscribers4 September 2026 — 48,793 subscribers7 September 2026 — 53,047 subscribers10 September 2026 — 50,914 subscribers12 September 2026 — 49,470 subscribers14 September 2026 — 51,585 subscribers16 September 2026 — 50,627 subscribers18 September 2026 — 49,219 subscribers49,2197 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +6,587. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,303–54,970 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 05:1849,219-1,408
16 Sept 2026, 03:4050,627-958
14 Sept 2026, 08:1951,585+2,115
12 Sept 2026, 15:1749,470-1,444
10 Sept 2026, 10:4050,914-2,133
7 Sept 2026, 04:1853,047+4,254
4 Sept 2026, 10:4148,793+2,145
2 Sept 2026, 19:4746,648-433
1 Sept 2026, 19:3447,081-381
31 Aug 2026, 16:1447,462-313
30 Aug 2026, 19:2347,775-455
29 Aug 2026, 17:2548,230+2,156
28 Aug 2026, 16:2346,074-1,051
27 Aug 2026, 13:0447,125-199
26 Aug 2026, 15:0247,324-290
25 Aug 2026, 18:3347,614+1,715
24 Aug 2026, 21:4345,899-419
23 Aug 2026, 05:3346,318-371
21 Aug 2026, 18:3546,689-279
20 Aug 2026, 14:2546,968first reading

Engagement

1,008 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.50%
avg views ÷ 49,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,680
692 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
695
of 1,008 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 690 of 692 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held1,008 (6 August 202620 September 2026)
Views total3,236,806
Reactions total131,707
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 16:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,650
Videos
246
Links
23

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
51m 00s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 85 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

174,256 reactions across 994 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥20,46111.7%
20,44811.7%
🥰17,73310.2%
👏17,67610.1%
👍17,3429.95%
🎉15,6779.00%
💯9,3865.39%
😍8,8505.08%
👌6,4653.71%
😁5,9133.39%
🤝4,3352.49%
👀3,7512.15%
❤‍🔥3,6802.11%
💔3,1871.83%
🤣2,5201.45%
👎2,1721.25%
😐1,8081.04%
😢1,4170.813%
🤬1,0280.59%
💋1,0050.577%
13 further kinds9,4025.40%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 174,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 16:23 UTC32 views145 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

📹 کار در خارج از خانه انجام شد ✔️ ۳ امتیاز و یک کلین‌شیت!🔥🙌 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1🔴

🔥3534👏28👍25🎉23

Signed Dσɾʂα 🎀

20 Sept 2026, 16:04 UTC461 views307 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🤩🎙تآندونی ایرائولا درباره فلوریان ویرتز و عملکرد کلی تیم در بازی امروز : 🔻 شروع آرامی داشت، اما بعد از مرحله ابتدایی بازی، فلوریان به ما کمک کرد تا بهتر شویم و از عملکرد او در نیمه دوم خیلی بیشتر راضی هستم. 🔻 در مجموع، به‌عنوان یک تیم، این سومین کلین‌شیت متوالی ماست. 🔻 هنوز چیزهایی برای بهتر شدن وجود دارد، اما وقتی نیاز داریم دفاع کنیم، بازیکنان دارند به تیم استحکام و ثبات می‌دهند.» 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolr

🔥62🎉51💯37❤‍🔥35👍3530🥰29👏28

Signed 𝑹𝒐𝒛𝒊𝒕𝒂

20 Sept 2026, 16:01 UTC464 views256 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🤩🎙 آندونی ایرائولا پس از پایان بازی : 🔻 واضحه که از نتیجه خوشحالم، چون می‌دونم بازی کردن در اینجا چقدر سخته. نیمه اول رو بهتر به پایان رسوندیم و در نیمه دوم هم عملکرد بهتری داشتیم. بازی برای ما سخت بود. 🔻 در نیمه دوم خیلی بهتر بازی رو کنترل کردیم و موقعیت‌هایی داشتیم که می‌تونستیم کار رو تمام کنیم. 🔻 اما در بخش ابتدایی بازی، ما توپ‌های دوم رو به دست نمی‌آوردیم و وقتی حریف با چنین شدتی بازی می‌کنه، باید شما هم در

🔥66🎉4436👏29👍26❤‍🔥20🥰19💯16

Signed 𝑹𝒐𝒛𝒊𝒕𝒂

20 Sept 2026, 15:55 UTC671 views260 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🔴🎙کاپیتان فندایک : 🔻 گلزنی برای ما خیلی مهمه؛ الکساندر ایساک هم شامل این موضوع میشه. پیروزی خوبی اینجا به دست آوردیم، کلین‌شیت کردیم و حالا قبل از اینکه خودمون رو برای یک دوره بسیار فشرده و سنگین پیش‌رو آماده کنیم، به تعطیلات بازی‌های ملی می‌ریم.» 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🔥59🎉45🥰33💯30❤‍🔥2726👏21👍19

Signed 𝑹𝒐𝒛𝒊𝒕𝒂

20 Sept 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,090 views274 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🔴🎙 جرمی ژاکه: 🔻 بازی کردن کنار ویرجیل برای من خیلی مهمه. می‌تونم چیزهای زیادی ازش یاد بگیرم. 🔻 خیلی خوشحالم؛ من در کنار بازیکنان خیلی خوبی بازی می‌کنم. بنابراین برای من، فقط لذت می‌برم و از این فرصت استفاده می‌کنم.» 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🔥64🎉5132👍32❤‍🔥29👏24🥰23💯19

Signed 𝑹𝒐𝒛𝒊𝒕𝒂

20 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,350 views160 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

🔴🔴🥇جرمی ژاکه جایزه بهترین بازیکن زمین (MOTM) رو از ویرجیل دریافت می‌کنه! 😍 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

👏37🎉2625👍23🔥21🥰13💯7😍5

Signed 𝐀𝐑𝐀𝐒𝐇

20 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC≈1,930 views577 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🔗 پایان بازی 🔔 ⚽️ BOU 😀 ⚽️ 😀 LIV 🔴 🔴 گلزنان لیورپول: 🤩🔴 الکساندر ایساک [ 53 ] بهترین بازیکن لیورپول : 🤩📊 نظرتون بنویسد راجب بازی 🤔 سومین کلین شیت متوالی لیورپول و همچنین روند بدون شکست آندونی ادامه دارد ⚡️🔥 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🎉118🔥107❤‍🔥93🥰85💯7638👍30👏29

Signed #Bɾʂαɱ

20 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,390 views189 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🤩🔴 گللللللللللللللل اولللللللللللل لیورپول به بورنموث توسط الکس ایساک در دقیقه 57 عجب گل زیبایی 💣 ⚽️ 😃😎 😀⚽️ | ➡️ WATCH GOAL 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🔥69🥰26👍17🎉16👌11🤯119💯9

Signed #Bɾʂαɱ

20 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC≈5,690 views454 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

📸 دو تا از خوشگلای تیم 😍🩷 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🎉94🥰91🔥7148👏43💯35👍26🍓20

Signed Dσɾʂα 🎀

20 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTC≈5,590 views348 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

📸 دو تا از خوبان 😎💯 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🎉56🥰46😁44🔥4238👍36👏31💯28

Signed Dσɾʂα 🎀

20 Sept 2026, 12:13 UTC≈5,690 views433 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

📸 چند تا شات از ورود برو بچ به ورزشگاه ویتالیتی بورنموث 💎✨ 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🥰69👍65👏61🎉5856😁50🔥43😍17

Signed Dσɾʂα 🎀

20 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈5,620 views470 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

📹 بچه های تیم رسیدن به ویتالیتی 😍 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 🔴 @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🔴

🎉88🔥87👏6857🥰49👍47❤‍🔥33💯26

Signed Dσɾʂα 🎀

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,008 posts we hold for @Liverpoolredarmyfans1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Liverpoolredarmyfans1 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 September 2026

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTCAnonymous Poll1,070 voters approx.

ادمین برتر از نظر شما عزیزان ❔

  1. سجاد16%
  2. رزیتا5%
  3. رویا7%
  4. درسا21%
  5. کیان6%
  6. زهرا2%
  7. شیما29%
  8. سینا5%
  9. آروین1%
  10. مروارید23%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTCAnonymous Poll3,660 voters approx.

محبوب ترین بازیکنتون از اسکواد فعلی 🤔

  1. آلیسون بکر🇧🇷22%
  2. الکساندر ایساک 🇸🇪8%
  3. ویرجیل فندایک 🇳🇱33%
  4. هوگو اکیتیکه 🔴5%
  5. رایان گراونبرخ 🇳🇱3%
  6. فلوریان ویرتز 🇩🇪4%
  7. کودی گاگپو 🇳🇱0%
  8. الکسیس مک آلیستر 🇦🇷3%
  9. دومنیک سوبوسلای 🇭🇺21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTCAnonymous Poll1,770 voters approx.

به نظرتون ادمین برتر این هفته کیه ❓

  1. 𝑲𝒊𝒂𝒏 | کیان14%
  2. 𝒁𝒂𝒉𝒓𝒂 | زهرا9%
  3. 𝑺𝒂𝒋𝒋𝒂𝒅 | سجاد12%
  4. 𝑹𝒐𝒚𝒂 | رویا12%
  5. 𝑯𝒂𝒎𝒊 | حامی17%
  6. 𝑫𝒐𝒓𝒔𝒂 | درسا17%
  7. 𝑩𝒂𝒓𝒔𝒂𝒎 | برسام15%
  8. 𝑨𝒓𝒗𝒊𝒏 | اروین2%
  9. 𝑺𝒊𝒂𝒗𝒂𝒔𝒉 | سیاوش2%
  10. 𝑹𝒐𝒛𝒊𝒕𝒂 | رزیتا10%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTCAnonymous Poll3,980 voters approx.

👀⚽️🏟 اگر همه خط هجومی تیم آماده باشند چه کسی برای ترکیب اصلی انتخاب میکنید ( ۳ نفر هجومی ) ❓

  1. کیران موریسون 🌟2%
  2. کودی گاگپو 🔴20%
  3. ریو انگوموها 🔴15%
  4. فده کیه زا 🔴2%
  5. الکس ایساک 🔴20%
  6. ویکتور مونیز 🌟3%
  7. بردلی بارکولا ( فرض ) 🇫🇷22%
  8. هوگو اکیتیکه 🔴20%
  9. ابراهیم امبایه ( فرض ) 🌟4%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTCAnonymous Poll1,690 voters approx.

👀⚽️📋اگر همه هافبکان آماده باشند چه کسی را برای ترکیب اصلی انتخاب میکنید ( ۳ نفر فیکس ) ❓

  1. فلوریان ویرتز 🇩🇪22%
  2. الکسیس مک آلیستر 🇦🇷20%
  3. رایان گراونبرخ 🇳🇱16%
  4. تری نیونی 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿23%
  5. دومنیک سوبوسلای 🇭🇺23%
  6. کورتیس جونز 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿3%
  7. هاروی الیوت 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿6%
  8. استفان بایچتیچ 🇪🇸1%
  9. جیمز مک کانل 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿1%
  10. واتارو اندو 🇯🇵1%

The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTCAnonymous Poll992 voters

👀🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿📋 اگر همه مدافعان آماده باشند، چه کسی را برای ترکیب اصلی انتخاب میکنید ( ۴ نفر فیکس ) ❓

  1. جرمی فریمپونگ 🇳🇱6%
  2. کانر بردلی 🇬🇧11%
  3. ویرجیل فندایک 🇳🇱48%
  4. جیوانی لئونی 🇮🇹9%
  5. جرمی ژاکه 🇫🇷11%
  6. رونالد ارائوخو 🇺🇾13%
  7. کوستاس سیمیکاس 🇬🇷4%
  8. میلوش کرکز 🇭🇺25%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 6 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ارتش سرخ لیورپول | RED ARMY” (@Liverpoolredarmyfans1), 49,219 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liverpoolredarmyfans1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.