🚨🇩🇪 | لیست رسمی تیم ملی آلمان به رهبری یورگن کلوپ برای فیفادی پیش رو؛ فلوریان ویرتز 🔴 در لیست دعوتشدگان قرار دارد ✅ 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
🎉54❤🔥34👏31❤29💩29👍20🥰20🤡19
Signed 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐝 ♡

Channel
@Liverpoolredarmyfans1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
65,837subscribers
+23,205 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003186545387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 |
| Description | Привет @durov Этот канал не является противозаконным и не содержит порнографических или грубых постов . Пожалуйста, обрати внимание! Официальный канал: @Telegram Owner: @Barsammusic12 تبلیغات : @Liverpool_blood چنل گل : @redarmygoal |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Liverpoolredarmyfans1 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:18 | 65,837 | -246 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:17 | 66,083 | -344 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:57 | 66,427 | -199 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:51 | 66,626 | -227 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:15 | 66,853 | -794 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 67,647 | +97 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 67,550 | +1,113 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:51 | 66,437 | -279 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 66,716 | -1,176 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 67,892 | -440 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 68,332 | -470 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:41 | 68,802 | -671 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:30 | 69,473 | -545 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 70,018 | -366 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 70,384 | +1,756 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:51 | 68,628 | -454 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 69,082 | -309 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:41 | 69,391 | -405 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 69,796 | +1,219 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 68,577 | first reading |
1,750 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,750 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,931,635 |
| Reactions total | 105,093 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 110 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
242,363 reactions across 998 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37,159 | 15.3% | |
| 🎉 | 32,595 | 13.4% | |
| ❤ | 27,535 | 11.4% | |
| 👍 | 24,810 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 21,912 | 9.04% | |
| 🥰 | 18,519 | 7.64% | |
| 💯 | 16,667 | 6.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13,869 | 5.72% | |
| 💔 | 6,042 | 2.49% | |
| 🤣 | 3,912 | 1.61% | |
| 👌 | 3,772 | 1.56% | |
| 👀 | 3,769 | 1.56% | |
| 😍 | 3,698 | 1.53% | |
| 😁 | 3,621 | 1.49% | |
| 👎 | 3,607 | 1.49% | |
| 😐 | 3,445 | 1.42% | |
| 🤝 | 3,213 | 1.33% | |
| 😢 | 2,460 | 1.02% | |
| ⚡ | 1,536 | 0.634% | |
| 💋 | 1,270 | 0.524% | |
| 15 further kinds | 8,952 | 3.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242,363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 448 of 484 posts held from the last 30 days (92.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨🇩🇪 | لیست رسمی تیم ملی آلمان به رهبری یورگن کلوپ برای فیفادی پیش رو؛ فلوریان ویرتز 🔴 در لیست دعوتشدگان قرار دارد ✅ 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
🎉54❤🔥34👏31❤29💩29👍20🥰20🤡19
Signed 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐝 ♡
🌟🎙 اظهارات جیمی کرگر درباره ترکیب پرهزینه لیورپول پس از شکست مقابل فنرباغچه در لیگ قهرمانان اروپا: 🔻 ترکیب لیورپول بسیار پرهزینه است، اما بهاندازهای که باید خوب نیست و از نظر ترکیب پستها و توازن تیمی نیز تعادل لازم را ندارد. 🔻 چیزی که کمی نگرانکننده است، نهچندان برای سرمربی، بلکه بیشتر برای افرادی است که باشگاه را اداره میکنند. 🔻 ریو انگوموها و تری نیونی بهترین بازیکنان لیورپول بودند؛ اما نکته اینجاست که آن…
👍69🤡24👎17👏15🤮14🔥12❤10💩10
Signed 𐙚 𝑨𝒊𝒅𝒂𓂃🪽
📸دومینیک سوبوسلای 🔴 و الکسیس مکآلیستر 🔴 برای محافظت از دخترانی که همراهشان بودند در برابر باران، سویشرتهای خودشان را روی آنها گرفتند. 🥹❤️ 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
👏58❤🔥43🎉39🔥38❤23🥰22👍20💯19
Signed 𝑹𝒐𝒚𝒂 🪽
🔴🎙 تری نیونی درباره شرایط تیم پس از دو شکست متوالی: 🔻 ذهنیت و روحیه تیم فوقالعاده است. دو بازی اخیر برای ما ناکامی و ضربه محسوب میشوند، اما یک تیم بزرگ باید بتواند به شرایط خوب برگردد. 🔻یکشنبه باید حتی بهتر از عملکرد امروزمان ظاهر شویم و اگر این کار را انجام دهیم، میتوانیم پیروز شویم.» 🔴🎙 نیونی درباره به ثمر رساندن اولین گل دوران حرفهایاش برای تیم بزرگسالان لیورپول: 🔻مثل همیشه احساس غرور میکنم. میدانم خا…
🎉43❤35🔥35🥰34👏33💯24❤🔥20😁20
Signed 🥀 ˡᵐ 𖣇⃟𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒎𝒂 𝑮𝒊𝒓𝒍 🦋
🌟🎙 آندونی ایرائولا درباره ترکیب ابتدایی و تصمیم به استفاده از بردلی بارکولا در پست مهاجم مرکزی: 🔻 ویکتور مونوز و ریو انگوموها را به زمین فرستادیم، چون از نظر بدنی شرایط آمادهتری داشتند. همچنین فکر میکردیم برای الکس ایساک بهتر باشد که حدود ۳۰ دقیقه بازی کند، نه بیشتر. 🔻 میخواستیم بردلی بارکولا را امتحان کنیم. هفته گذشته در بازی مقابل چلسی از کودی گاکپو در این نقش استفاده کردیم و این بار تصمیم گرفتیم به بردلی فرصت…
👎86❤33👍26👏21🎉19😐18🤣13🤡11
Signed 🥀 ˡᵐ 𖣇⃟𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒎𝒂 𝑮𝒊𝒓𝒍 🦋
🌟🎙 آندونی ایرائولا درباره دریافت گلهای آسان مقابل فنرباغچه: 🔻 گلهایی که دریافت کردیم، واقعاً آشفته و قابل پیشگیری بودند. گل اول از روی یک ضربه آزاد به ثمر رسید؛ ضربهای که از فاصله نسبتاً زیادی زده شد و از دیوار دفاعی عبور کرد. اینها اشتباهاتی هستند که میتوانند برای تیم گران تمام شوند. 🔻 در مورد گل آخر هم، ابتدا با یک پرتاب اوت بلند مواجه شدیم. در مرحله اول توپ را کنترل کردیم، اما بعد یک توپ بلند ارسال شد و مور…
👎74😐21💩18🤣18🥴15🤡13🤬13💯9
Signed 🥀 ˡᵐ 𖣇⃟𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒎𝒂 𝑮𝒊𝒓𝒍 🦋
🔴🎙 الکساندر ایساک درباره شکست مقابل فنرباغچه: 🔻 بازی کردن در اینجا هیچوقت آسان نیست، اما فکر میکنم امروز میتوانستیم و باید نتیجه بهتری از این مسابقه میگرفتیم. اینکه دو بار از حریف پیش افتادیم و در نهایت بازی را واگذار کردیم، کمی سهلانگارانه بود و اصلاً در حد استانداردهای ما نیست. طبیعتاً از این نتیجه بسیار ناراحت و ناامید هستیم.» 🔴🎙 الکساندر ایساک درباره جو ورزشگاه و هواداران فنرباغچه: 🔻 جو ورزشگاه واقعاً فو…
🎉44🔥37👍28❤22🥰21❤🔥19👏18💯17
Signed 🥀 ˡᵐ 𖣇⃟𝑺𝒉𝒊𝒎𝒂 𝑮𝒊𝒓𝒍 🦋
🌟🎙 آندونی ایرائولا درباره احساسش پس از بازی: 🔻 احساس من ناامیدی و سرخوردگی است؛ چون بازی در چنین ورزشگاه و شرایطی بسیار دشوار است. 🔻 با این حال، در بخش زیادی از مسابقه احساس میکردیم میتوانیم برنده شویم، اما در نهایت این اتفاق نیفتاد. 🔻 بهخصوص گل اول و سوم را نباید دریافت میکردیم. گل دوم حاصل توپ برگشتی بود، اما در گل اول فکر نمیکنم دیوار دفاعی را بهدرستی چیده باشیم. 🔻 در گل آخر هم موریقی مقابل سه مدافع ما ب…
👎79🤬23💩19😐18💯10🥴10🤣9🤡8
Signed 𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐥 🌛
🌟🎙 آندونی ایرائولا درباره شکست مقابل فنرباغچه: 🔻 اصلیترین دلیلی که برای این شکست میتوانم پیدا کنم، دریافت سه گل از روی ضربات ایستگاهی بود. 🔻 در لیگ از این نظر عملکرد بسیار خوبی داشتیم و تا پیش از بازی امروز، بهخوبی از پس این موقعیتها برمیآمدیم. 🔻 میدانستیم ضربات ایستگاهی یکی از نقاط قوت فنرباغچه است، اما از روی ضربه آزاد، کرنر و حتی در نهایت پرتاب اوت بلند گل دریافت کردیم. 🔻 این گلها ضربه بزرگی به ما زدند؛…
👎82🤬24🤣17🥰15💩10😍9👍8💯7
Signed 𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐥 🌛
⚽️⭐📊| لیورپول در ۷ بازی خارج از خانه مقابل تیمهای ترکیهای در تاریخ جام باشگاههای اروپا و لیگ قهرمانان اروپا، ۶ بار شکست خورده است؛ از جمله ۵ شکست متوالی! 🇹🇷 ❌ 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
💔90👍23🤡18😐18👏16🤣12🤮10😢9
Signed ᥫ᭡ 𝑺𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒇
🔴 سوت پایان؛ یک شکست دیگر و کلی سؤال بیجواب! 🏴 LIV 😃 ⭐ 😃 FBŞ 🇹🇷 آقای ایرائولا، ظاهراً وعدههای فوتبال هجومیتان فقط روی کاغذ زیبا هستند؛ لیورپول با شعار و کنفرانس خبری نتیجه نمیگیرد! 🙂 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
👍49💔31❤15💩11🤬10🤡9👎8🙏7
Signed 𝖧𝖺𝗆𝗂 𝖬𝖪
▶️🔴گلللللللللللللللللللللل دوم لیورپول به فنرباغچه دقیقه 69 💣 🤩 الکساندر ایساک ⚽️ 🤩 کودی گاگپو 🅰️ 🇹🇷 😀 😎😃⚽️ | ➡️ WATCH GOAL 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🟥🟥🟥 🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀🍀 ⚽️ @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 🦁
🔥46🎉43🥰23👏21❤18💯18❤🔥17👍14
Signed #Bɾʂαɱ
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,750 posts we hold for @Liverpoolredarmyfans1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Liverpoolredarmyfans1 edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 6 posts on @Liverpoolredarmyfans1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ادمین برتر ماه چنل ❓🧐
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👀👑 بهترین بازیکن ماه لیورپول از نظر شما چه کسی است ❓
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 September 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ارتش سرخ لیورپول | RED ARMY” (@Liverpoolredarmyfans1), 65,837 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Liverpoolredarmyfans1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.