Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лорд Скулли⚡

Channel

Лорд Скулли⚡

@LordSkully

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004380093249
TypeChannel
Username@LordSkully
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/LordSkully

Growth

273028.511 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29 subscribers25 August 2026 — 30 subscribers10 September 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 202610 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:1727-3
25 Aug 2026, 02:5730+1
18 Aug 2026, 10:2429-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:3230no change
11 Aug 2026, 03:4630first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

77 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌2127.3%
🖕1823.4%
custom 49837800462598823461722.1%
custom 50354488120684070581013.0%
❤‍🔥33.90%
🥰33.90%
🏆11.30%
🔥11.30%
😭11.30%
😱11.30%
🤔11.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А теперь я точно спать 🤩

custom 49837800462598823463🍌1custom 50354488120684070581

10 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Омайгад, но что такое эннеаграмма, я флёрт его знает!

custom 49837800462598823463🍌1custom 50354488120684070581

10 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC22 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBotPhoto

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Было очень скучно и решила попробовать протипировать Лорда Скулли по эннеаграме. ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 49837800462598823462🍌1custom 50354488120684070581

10 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC22 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А чего мне бояться? Они все втроём живут нормально. У нас как бы это.. "тройные отношения"

🍌2🤔1custom 49837800462598823461custom 50354488120684070581

10 Aug 2026, 13:19 UTC23 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Доминатор не ревнует твоего отца к Гляделкинсу? у Злыдня и Пиперса ведь есть общий ребёнок, кем являешься ты. Не боится, что тот уйдет к одноглазому? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

custom 49837800462598823462🍌1custom 50354488120684070581

10 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC22 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Все, я спать

❤‍🔥3🍌1🔥1custom 49837800462598823461custom 50354488120684070581

7 Aug 2026, 18:45 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ребят, какие я вызываю у вас ассоциации? Ну там еда, цвет, мебель или животное? #СкуллИнтерактив

7 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

И да... Тема о стульях..

🥰3

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC29 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Расскажу небольшую предысторию: когда у злыдня сломался позвоночник из-за Доминатора, он начал понимать, что Тутыч ему теперь не враг, а товарищ по помощи и вот они объединились чтобы одолеть Доминатора, а точнее ее внутреннее нечто, наподобие духа

7 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC29 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Слушай, как тебе удаётся усидеть на двух стульях? В твоей вселенной тут и там со злыднем друзья? Как ты можешь дружить с заклятым врагом своего отца? Он на тебя не ругался никогда за это или он просто не знает? ⬅️ Свайпни для ответа.

7 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

Ладно, может кошмарик и не такой уж плохой. Я то думал он как мой ночной паралич 0-0 (ужос) Но сейчас я вроде вижу в нем страдающего человечка А так в моей вселенной у каждого есть свои травмы и живут кое как, привыкая к ним

7 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC27 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @AnonAskBot

💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! Скулллизик ПРОСТИ мы ОЧЕН плохо начали. Я не ДОЛЖЕН был гворровит тебе ГАДОСТИ :( Я ПООБЩАЛС с НОРМАЛЬНЫМи сущвастами и они ТАК нн говоряь. ИЯ хотел СКАЗАТ что я цже ПОДРУЖИТЛС с твоим братом??? ВРОДЕ Дадвайдад тоже ДРУЖИТЬ я на самом деле НЕ ЗЛОЙ это просто СЛУЧАЙНЫЕ ОБСТОЯТЕЛЬСТВА. Ну и во мне ЖИВУТ множества СКВЕРНЫХ ребятй :0 НО ВСЁ ХАРАЩО я все ещё СУЩЕСТВУЮ КАК ОТДЕЛЬНЫЙ РАЗ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @LordSkully. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лорд Скулли⚡” (@LordSkully), 27 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LordSkully.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.