Channel
@LoserSubculture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003026784447 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LoserSubculture |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LoserSubculture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 64 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 63 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 61 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 59 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 58 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 51 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 51 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👾 | 137 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @LoserSubculture. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
14.08 — СОЛНЕЧНЫЙ У чувака из Злодейских Планов через несколько дней выходит первый полноценный альбом Солнечный - это 5 песен про лето, прогулки с друзьями, меланхолию и всякие приятные моменты, что потом вспоминаются с легкой грустью Тут намешали инди-рок, альтернативу, шугейз и даже немного мидвест-эмо Пресейв - ТЫК Тгк - ТЫК А если хотите заработать денег, то у ЗЛПЛ всё ещё идёт конкурс с призами 1000₽ / 50…
👾8
25 ЛЕТ В какой-то момент человеку исполняется 25. Это грустно. Во многом больно. Особенно когда ты ничего не добился и ничего не сделал. В этот момент остаётся только одно. Тт Инста Тгк
👾13
Чуваки готовят что-то тяжёлое У наших лузеров из Foundead скоро начинается очень интересный период. на 130 подписоты в канале вас ждет оч крутой анонс связанный с новым музлом, а также инфа о концертах. Пока без лишних спойлеров, но если любите альт-метал и металкор, то подпишитесь на самых тяжелых по звучанию лузеров в нашем лейбле ТЫК ТЫК ТЫК ТЫК
👾10
Posted without readable text
👾13
18.08 НЬЮ РЕЛИЗ ОТ ПРОЕКТА "ЯДЕРНОЕ ЛЕТО" Новый релиз - это сочетание вайба инди-рока 2000-х, культурного кода ру-инди 10-х и звучания шугейзеров с нью-вейверами 90-х. Так чт, чуваки, самое время подписаться на тгк и ждать пиздатого сингла. Пресейв - Тык Тгк - Тык
👾12
В клубе неудачников пополнение! К лузерам присоединилась группа квас на берёзовом соке Чуваки играют где-то между эмогейзом, шугейзом и всем, что можно назвать крутым гейзом Так чт встречаем новых лузеров и подписываемся на их тгк: Тык
👾11
В клубе неудачников пополнение! К лузерам присоединился проект mузей трупов Жанры тут перечислять бесполезно: от шугейза и альтернативы до экспериментального репа. Короче, максимально мультижанровая история с мрачной и противоречивой атмосферой Кстати, уже совсем скоро у чувака выходит новый альбом, так что оформляем пресейвы Пресейв - ТЫК тгк - ТЫК
👾10
В клубе неудачников пополнение! Солнечно Дождливо - инди-роцк группа из Москвы, которая теперь стала частью Loser Subculture Так что встречаем новых чуваков на лейбле и продолжаем понемногу собирать весь андеграунд в одном месте Тгк - тык
👾13
THE PADLA BEARS Трибьют на Padla Bear Outfit Наверное, это самый большой релиз Loser Subculture на данный момент, в нем приняло участие множество людей из лейбла лузеров, а также чуваки из Delayble. Отдельное спасибо Арсению Морозову за поддержку трибьюта и обложку, которую он специально сделал для нас. Пресейв - тык в сборнике принимали участие: bomjure Провал кирил образина Ядерное Лето Sunset Knights жека гон…
👾15
Злодейские Планы решили раздать денег Чувак из ЗЛПЛ 14 августа дропает новый альбом «Солнечный», а вместе с этим запускает конкурс Что надо сделать? — оформить пресейв — снять вообще любой тикток под сниппет с нового альбома (липсинк, эдит, мем, пофик что) — указать группу и альбом в описании или комментариях, а также оставить хештег #злодейскийальбом (или отметить тт акк @derweyk8) Призы: 1 место - 1000₽ 2 место -…
👾7
Вчера прошел первый лайв СБ на FDR Fest Несмотря на то, что в итоге наш сет длился всего 8–10 минут (по канону гаража), мы успели сыграть пять песен: Дальше только даунхилл, Почему, Вайс, Танцевать и Оставь меня. Все остальные артисты были металюгами, да и почти вся аудитория тоже (насток, что половина зала ушла в курилку сидеть, ибо я не метал ебошу), но, как по мне, СБ выступили пиздато, а те чуваки, что остались,…
👾7
АЛЬБОМ ВЫШЕЛ Foundead - seems like impossible Seems like impossible Nameless (196) Край Л.О.Ж.ъ ЯНДЕКС СПОТИФАЙ мп3 👇
👾6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @LoserSubculture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Loser Subculture” (@LoserSubculture), 64 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LoserSubculture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.