Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -66,520. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 735,842–822,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:38
745,820
-2,661
15 Sept 2026, 13:59
748,481
-1,832
13 Sept 2026, 21:18
750,313
-3,049
12 Sept 2026, 07:15
753,362
-2,892
9 Sept 2026, 23:56
756,254
-6,076
6 Sept 2026, 15:21
762,330
-3,487
4 Sept 2026, 02:16
765,817
-2,361
2 Sept 2026, 13:02
768,178
-1,996
1 Sept 2026, 16:28
770,174
-1,898
31 Aug 2026, 18:04
772,072
-1,952
30 Aug 2026, 16:07
774,024
-1,773
29 Aug 2026, 12:59
775,797
-1,328
28 Aug 2026, 10:34
777,125
-1,740
27 Aug 2026, 12:58
778,865
-574
26 Aug 2026, 11:04
779,439
-1,772
25 Aug 2026, 13:54
781,211
-1,823
24 Aug 2026, 15:28
783,034
-2,507
22 Aug 2026, 23:53
785,541
-4,599
21 Aug 2026, 12:46
790,140
-1,266
20 Aug 2026, 15:54
791,406
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.637%
avg views ÷ 745,820 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,750
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.151%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
34 (8 June 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
47,530
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 06:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
903
Videos
11
Links
148
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
361 reactions across 30 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
285
78.9%
👍
26
7.20%
👏
13
3.60%
🔥
11
3.05%
😁
9
2.49%
💯
7
1.94%
🎃
4
1.11%
🎉
3
0.831%
🥰
2
0.554%
🦄
1
0.277%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Adrian Joel Perez
Second Prize: 10 USDT
RDXZ
Third Prize: 5 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
Alf Eirik Bråten
Mohammad Abdullah
Kamrul
Shokta
BeHa
MAYUKH
হাদি
Rrrr
Shahadot
Jahangir
Ayoub Boudiaf
Halim
Terrify
Barek
Babu
Choudhury
Teherul
Kaku Pst
Munna Para
মুন্না পারা
……
For the full list, please check the draw d
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Adrian Joel Perez
Second Prize: 10 USDT
RDXZ
Third Prize: 5 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
মমি
Antiq
আবিদ
Liton
Labu
Fejul B
মন্টু
Ant
Bagicha Para
মুন্না
Alamin
এনামুল
Anamul
Faddu
Manik P
Vatiji
ফুক্কার
Roni
Rasheed
মামুন
……
For the full list, please check the draw details
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Adrian Joel Perez
Second Prize: 10 USDT
OBL丨ALQDA
Third Prize: 5 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
সাঈদ
sajibbro
Sumon Ray
ঘুরতে
ধন্য
একরাজ
দাদী
আলম
নূর
ফাহিমা
Helal caca
শরন
Toni
Mamun
Mukti
Ingith
Aktara
BabuDada
Vuttu
চাচা
……
For the full list, please check the draw details
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Logan Rudra Mitchell Rivera
Second Prize: 10 USDT
OBL丨ALQDA
Third Prize: 5 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
অমিত
Said Mahtali
A kuddus
Mehedi
শরন
Saad
Franky Anjas
Masud Srg
Puaa
Christ
Aktara
Sarejul
Nadir
আবিদ
নাহিদ
লিটন
Labu
Anti
Gonga
Fejul B
……
For the full list, please check the draw details
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Tristan Miles Freeman
Second Prize: 10 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Third Prize: 5 USDT
CRYPTOGURU
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
Tattoo
Thank
Poka
Nadira
Aduri
Shaba
Haystack
একরাজ
তিথী
ফাহিমা
Maxwell Johnson
Vuttu
Cachi
আবিদ
লাবু
Labu
Bishu
Dr. Motiur
PST
Munna
……
For the full list, please check the draw details
🎁🎁The draw is now!🎁🎁
🥳🥳Congratulations to the following winning users:
First Prize: 20 USDT
Logan Rudra Mitchell Rivera
Second Prize: 10 USDT
CRYPTOGURU
Third Prize: 5 USDT
βΣLΔҜ ⋆ GΩLD ⋆
Fourth Prize: 0.01 USDT
সাঈদ
Choiti
Niyam
Nadira
sajibbro
Sahanaj
Sabuj
রাহুল
টনি
ফকির
Why?
Taivin
Haystack
Masud
Aktara
Nadir
Mosib
সাজাদ
Anti
Ata
……
For the full list, please check the draw details
🎁Prize Pool:
├ 20 USDT x1
├ 10 USDT x1
├ 5 USDT x1
├ 0.01 USDT x500
👇Click the link to win prizes for free!
❤9💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @Lucky_Draw_Master. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Lucky_Draw_Master named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hiveneten named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Lucky Draw Master” (@Lucky_Draw_Master), 745,820 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lucky_Draw_Master.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.