Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Luna Whale Zone 🐳

Channel

Luna Whale Zone 🐳

@LunaDanielOriginal

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

27,011subscribers

+1,968 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692061535
TypeChannel
Username@LunaDanielOriginal
DescriptionMau Zone Whale Scalper? Swing ? Ayuh sini sama Luna😘
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/LunaDanielOriginal

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,83227,01925,925.57 August 2026 β€” 25,043 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 25,041 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 25,018 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 25,006 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 24,986 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 24,953 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 24,917 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 24,897 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 24,877 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 24,846 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 24,832 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 24,859 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 24,920 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 24,958 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 24,986 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 24,984 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 25,044 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 25,063 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 25,101 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 25,108 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 25,115 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 25,102 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 25,156 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 25,236 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 25,285 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 25,334 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 25,557 subscribers9 September 2026 β€” 25,770 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 25,937 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 25,992 subscribers15 September 2026 β€” 26,125 subscribers17 September 2026 β€” 26,162 subscribers25 September 2026 β€” 26,620 subscribers4 October 2026 β€” 26,944 subscribers9 October 2026 β€” 27,011 subscribers13 October 2026 β€” 26,992 subscribers14 October 2026 β€” 26,983 subscribers15 October 2026 β€” 26,995 subscribers16 October 2026 β€” 27,015 subscribers17 October 2026 β€” 27,013 subscribers18 October 2026 β€” 27,019 subscribers19 October 2026 β€” 27,011 subscribers27,0117 August 202619 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net +1,968. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,504–27,347 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Oct 2026, 12:3627,011-8
18 Oct 2026, 15:3627,019+6
17 Oct 2026, 19:0727,013-2
16 Oct 2026, 18:5627,015+20
15 Oct 2026, 17:0926,995+12
14 Oct 2026, 17:2026,983-9
13 Oct 2026, 04:4826,992-19
9 Oct 2026, 00:5627,011+67
4 Oct 2026, 12:2226,944+324
25 Sept 2026, 23:2126,620+458
17 Sept 2026, 07:4026,162+37
15 Sept 2026, 06:1826,125+133
13 Sept 2026, 15:1825,992+55
11 Sept 2026, 16:3525,937+167
9 Sept 2026, 01:2125,770+213
5 Sept 2026, 16:1825,557+223
3 Sept 2026, 14:5825,334+49
2 Sept 2026, 09:2425,285+49
1 Sept 2026, 10:2525,236+80
31 Aug 2026, 07:4425,156first reading

Engagement

241 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
9.14%
avg views Γ· 27,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,470
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.99%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
114
of 241 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 19 October 2026
Posts held241 (5 August 2026 – 19 October 2026)
Views total281,315
Reactions total8,425
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Oct 2026, 17:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
β‰ˆ18,200
Videos
β‰ˆ399
Links
β‰ˆ1,590

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 25s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

15,188 reactions across 241 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ”₯5,32435.1%
πŸ’‹2,74418.1%
πŸ‘1,89112.5%
🐳1,89012.4%
❀1,2438.18%
🫑4703.09%
πŸ†2591.71%
❀‍πŸ”₯2291.51%
πŸ₯°2211.46%
😘2071.36%
πŸ¦„1460.961%
😍1320.869%
✍1260.83%
πŸŽ‰1160.764%
πŸ’―870.573%
πŸ“350.23%
⚑320.211%
🀩190.125%
πŸ™160.105%
πŸ€—10.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 241 of the 241 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 15,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 241 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 241 we hold a reading for Β· 6%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @LunaDanielOriginal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 241 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Oct 2026, 16:33 UTC238 views4 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

WHALEZONE HIT 575++ PIPS AND STILL RUNNING!! Wave 1: 45+ PIPS πŸ‘‘ Wave 2: 58+ PIPS πŸ‘‘ Wave 3: 472++ PIPS πŸ‘‘ Always listen and trust Luna baby! U pasti cuaann!! Happy cuaanπŸ’‹ #WhalezoneNihBoss #ILOVEUGOLD #CuanEveryday

πŸ‘3❀1

19 Oct 2026, 04:07 UTCβ‰ˆ1,250 views50 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

🐳 WHALEZONE MONEYDAY Gold try to rebound again! Structure bullish intraday masih terjaga selama di atas Zone Buy 1 Kotak Pink: SELL ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Kotak Grey: BUY ⬆️⬆️⬆️ Disiplin tunggu konfirmasi, jangan kejar harga. Biarkan market yang datang ke zona! #UpdateWHALEZONE #TradeByDirection #Direction101

🐳21❀17πŸ‘6πŸ”₯3πŸ†2😘1

19 Oct 2026, 02:53 UTC147 views35 reactionsread 19 October 2026

TAP 100++ πŸ”₯, Luna share mapping

πŸ”₯27πŸ‘4🫑2❀1πŸ₯°1

19 Oct 2026, 01:22 UTCβ‰ˆ1,500 views141 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

Wanna be like this? TAP: πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ #MANIFESTING

πŸ”₯115❀6πŸ’―6πŸ“3🐳3πŸ‘2πŸ₯°2😘2

19 Oct 2026, 01:20 UTCβ‰ˆ1,460 views39 reactionsread 19 October 2026

MORNING RICH PEOPLE!!

πŸ‘15πŸ’‹10❀7πŸ₯°2❀‍πŸ”₯1πŸ“1πŸŽ‰1πŸ†1

16 Oct 2026, 05:51 UTCβ‰ˆ2,650 views77 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

NDB $30 UDAH MELUNCUR!! πŸ’Ά Congrats buat semua winners yang terpilih! Dan terima kasih untuk semua feedback yang udah kalian kasihπŸ’– Just a little reminder, sayangku! Pemilihan penerima NDB tetap mengikuti ketentuan pengundian dan proses seleksi yang berlaku. Buat yang belum kebagian, stay tuned & jangan lupa UNMUTE CHANNEL LUNA buat update selanjutnya! Happy cuaan, sayang-sayang LunaπŸ’‹ #NDBUpdate #NDB30Dollar #Sta…

πŸ”₯35❀9πŸ’‹8😘7🐳5❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘3πŸ₯°3

16 Oct 2026, 05:28 UTCβ‰ˆ2,090 views37 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Video

380++ PIPS #WHALEZONE FLY!! Luna selalu bilang buat pantau! Dimana ada Whale, ada Zone, disitu kita entryπŸ’‹ #WhalezoneJuara #HappyCuaaan #ILOVEUGOLD

πŸ‘16πŸ’‹5❀4🐳3❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ”₯2😘2πŸŽ‰1

16 Oct 2026, 04:39 UTCβ‰ˆ1,900 views41 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

🐳 #WHALEZONE UPDATE Gold try to rebound after PPI. Struktur bullish recovery mulai dominan selama bertahan di atas Zone Buy 1 Kotak Pink: SELL ⬇️⬇️⬇️ Kotak Grey: BUY ⬆️⬆️⬆️ Perhatikan 3 Zone yang Luna kasih. Perhatikan structure market and be careful!πŸ’‹ #TrustWhalezone #TradeByDirection #Direction101

❀19πŸ”₯7🐳5πŸ†2πŸ‘2😘2✍1❀‍πŸ”₯1

16 Oct 2026, 01:20 UTCβ‰ˆ1,910 views141 reactionsread 19 October 2026

Last day, bantu Luna tentukan Gold akan kemana! [🐳🐳🐳] SELL AND DROP! [πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯] BUY REBOUND!

πŸ”₯78🐳49❀‍πŸ”₯4πŸ‘4πŸ’‹2⚑1πŸ’―1πŸ₯°1

16 Oct 2026, 01:07 UTCβ‰ˆ1,860 views61 reactionsread 19 October 2026

Selamat paagiii, salam Jumat berkah sayangku πŸ’‹

πŸ’‹31πŸ‘8😍7❀3😘3❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸŽ‰2πŸ’―2

15 Oct 2026, 15:57 UTCβ‰ˆ2,150 views55 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

NDB $30 BATCH 1 UDAH LANDING, SAYANGGG! πŸ’΅ Congrats buat 300 WINNERS yang terpilih! Tapii, belum selesai sampai sini yaa! Masih ada batch berikutnya yang bakal Luna spill πŸ‘€ Buat yang belum kebagian? DON’T WORRY, BABY! Tungguin next event dari Luna, jangan lupa STANDBY & UNMUTE CHANNEL LUNA biar nggak ketinggalan info selanjutnya! Happy cuaanπŸ’‹ #NDBUpdate #NDB30Dollar #StayTunedWithLuna

πŸ‘23πŸ’‹8πŸ”₯7😍4❀3πŸ™3πŸ†2πŸ¦„2

15 Oct 2026, 12:32 UTCβ‰ˆ1,300 views40 reactionsread 16 October 2026
Photo

+250 PIPS WIN PPI‼️ Ambil profit kaliannnnn! Thanks for trusting me! πŸ’‹πŸ’‹πŸ’‹ #WhalezoneJuara #MemangAjib

πŸ‘16πŸ’‹9πŸ”₯8❀3🐳2🫑2

Showing the 12 most recent of 241 posts we hold for @LunaDanielOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@LunaDanielOriginal edited 13 posts after it first published β€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 October 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hatta pips war
@Alhattaa Β· 370
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here β€” alongside 80 others β€” read 27 August 2026
Ameer Charles Fx
@CharlesTradingMethod Β· 43,200
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 29 August 2026
Hafiz Layer MYR
@hafimyrlayer Β· 73,824
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here β€” alongside 85 others β€” read 19 August 2026
Madam Jade πŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¬
@madamjadee Β· 47,882
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 25 August 2026
MOVZOLD OFFICIAL
@movzold Β· 57,662
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 22 August 2026
Octa Analytics
@octa_analytics Β· 74,866
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œLuna Whale Zone πŸ³β€ (@LunaDanielOriginal), 27,011 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LunaDanielOriginal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.