26 measurements spanning 27 days, net +291. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 24,757β25,409 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 14:58
25,334
+49
2 Sept 2026, 09:24
25,285
+49
1 Sept 2026, 10:25
25,236
+80
31 Aug 2026, 07:44
25,156
+54
30 Aug 2026, 06:07
25,102
-13
29 Aug 2026, 08:03
25,115
+7
28 Aug 2026, 06:01
25,108
+7
27 Aug 2026, 04:58
25,101
+38
26 Aug 2026, 02:07
25,063
+19
25 Aug 2026, 02:04
25,044
+60
23 Aug 2026, 15:37
24,984
-2
22 Aug 2026, 03:48
24,986
+28
20 Aug 2026, 21:44
24,958
+38
19 Aug 2026, 22:52
24,920
+61
18 Aug 2026, 23:16
24,859
+27
17 Aug 2026, 19:34
24,832
-14
16 Aug 2026, 15:47
24,846
-31
14 Aug 2026, 22:33
24,877
-20
13 Aug 2026, 10:34
24,897
-20
12 Aug 2026, 13:54
24,917
first reading
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
8.54%
avg views Γ· 25,334 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,160
121 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
121
of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
121 (5 August 2026 β 3 September 2026)
Views total
261,740
Reactions total
6,415
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9m 41s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
6,415 reactions across 121 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 121 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 6,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
49
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 121 we hold a reading for Β· 10%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @LunaDanielOriginal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
π³ UPDATE #WHALEZONE GOLD
Whalezone Sell 1: 4455-4465
Whalezone Sell 2: 4630-4640
Whalezone Buy 1: 4364-4350
Whalezone Buy 2: 4301-4283
Big direction masih bearish, but market comes with structures. Ada WHALE, ada ZONE, disitu kita TEKANNN! πππ³
#TradeByDirection #WhalezoneJuara #WajibCuan
SALAM 1000 PIPS π€
Mau close all? Sabar TP max ada di atas sana. Perhatikan akhir video!
Ada kotak pink di atas faham kan apa maknanya?? πππ
#WhalezoneMemangJos #Direction101 #HappyCuaaan
π³π NEW PLAN #WHALEZONE DIRECTION
U guys tandai di chart masing2 untuk standby dalam zone! Siap siap kita gaspol remblong cuan hari ini! π
#WhalezoneCuanTerus #HappyCuaaan #WajibCuan
Gold terus drop almost 2000 pips sejak #WHALEZONE fokus SELL THE RALLY!
Target next sell dimana? Boleh buy dimana? Kelen nyalain dulu apinya!
TAP: π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
+200 PIPS #WHALEZONE FLY SESUAI ARAHAN!
U just need to pantau dimana ada WHALE, ada ZONE, disitu kita entry. Santaiiii! π
#HappyCuaaan #ILOVEUGOLD #WhalezoneCuanTerus
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @LunaDanielOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@LunaDanielOriginal edited 6 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Al Hatta @Alhattaa Β· 45,449 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 27 August 2026
Ameer Charles Fx @CharlesTradingMethod Β· 42,430 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 29 August 2026
Hafiz Layer MYR @hafimyrlayer Β· 74,430 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here β alongside 85 others β read 19 August 2026
Madam Jade πΈπ¬ @madamjadee Β· 50,290 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 80 here β alongside 79 others β read 25 August 2026
MOVZOLD OFFICIAL @movzold Β· 61,334 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 84 here β alongside 83 others β read 22 August 2026
Octa Analytics @octa_analytics Β· 75,973 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here β alongside 83 others β read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βLuna Whale Zone π³β (@LunaDanielOriginal), 25,334 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LunaDanielOriginal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.