WHALEZONE HIT 575++ PIPS AND STILL RUNNING!! Wave 1: 45+ PIPS π Wave 2: 58+ PIPS π Wave 3: 472++ PIPS π Always listen and trust Luna baby! U pasti cuaann!! Happy cuaanπ #WhalezoneNihBoss #ILOVEUGOLD #CuanEveryday
π3β€1

Channel
@LunaDanielOriginal
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Posts edited after publishing Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
27,011subscribers
+1,968 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001692061535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @LunaDanielOriginal |
| Description | Mau Zone Whale Scalper? Swing ? Ayuh sini sama Lunaπ |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 42 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/LunaDanielOriginal |
Crypto & trading β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 27,011 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 27,019 | +6 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 27,013 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 27,015 | +20 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:09 | 26,995 | +12 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 26,983 | -9 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:48 | 26,992 | -19 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:56 | 27,011 | +67 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:22 | 26,944 | +324 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 26,620 | +458 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 26,162 | +37 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 26,125 | +133 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 25,992 | +55 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 25,937 | +167 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 25,770 | +213 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 25,557 | +223 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 25,334 | +49 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 25,285 | +49 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:25 | 25,236 | +80 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 25,156 | first reading |
241 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 119 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 19 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 241 (5 August 2026 β 19 October 2026) |
| Views total | 281,315 |
| Reactions total | 8,425 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 17:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 19 October 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 40 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
15,188 reactions across 241 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 5,324 | 35.1% | |
| π | 2,744 | 18.1% | |
| π | 1,891 | 12.5% | |
| π³ | 1,890 | 12.4% | |
| β€ | 1,243 | 8.18% | |
| π«‘ | 470 | 3.09% | |
| π | 259 | 1.71% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 229 | 1.51% | |
| π₯° | 221 | 1.46% | |
| π | 207 | 1.36% | |
| π¦ | 146 | 0.961% | |
| π | 132 | 0.869% | |
| β | 126 | 0.83% | |
| π | 116 | 0.764% | |
| π― | 87 | 0.573% | |
| π | 35 | 0.23% | |
| β‘ | 32 | 0.211% | |
| π€© | 19 | 0.125% | |
| π | 16 | 0.105% | |
| π€ | 1 | 0.007% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 241 of the 241 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 15,188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 241 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 19 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @LunaDanielOriginal. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 241 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 19 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
WHALEZONE HIT 575++ PIPS AND STILL RUNNING!! Wave 1: 45+ PIPS π Wave 2: 58+ PIPS π Wave 3: 472++ PIPS π Always listen and trust Luna baby! U pasti cuaann!! Happy cuaanπ #WhalezoneNihBoss #ILOVEUGOLD #CuanEveryday
π3β€1
π³ WHALEZONE MONEYDAY Gold try to rebound again! Structure bullish intraday masih terjaga selama di atas Zone Buy 1 Kotak Pink: SELL β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ Kotak Grey: BUY β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ Disiplin tunggu konfirmasi, jangan kejar harga. Biarkan market yang datang ke zona! #UpdateWHALEZONE #TradeByDirection #Direction101
π³21β€17π6π₯3π2π1
TAP 100++ π₯, Luna share mapping
π₯27π4π«‘2β€1π₯°1
Wanna be like this? TAP: π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯ #MANIFESTING
π₯115β€6π―6π3π³3π2π₯°2π2
MORNING RICH PEOPLE!!
π15π10β€7π₯°2β€βπ₯1π1π1π1
NDB $30 UDAH MELUNCUR!! πΆ Congrats buat semua winners yang terpilih! Dan terima kasih untuk semua feedback yang udah kalian kasihπ Just a little reminder, sayangku! Pemilihan penerima NDB tetap mengikuti ketentuan pengundian dan proses seleksi yang berlaku. Buat yang belum kebagian, stay tuned & jangan lupa UNMUTE CHANNEL LUNA buat update selanjutnya! Happy cuaan, sayang-sayang Lunaπ #NDBUpdate #NDB30Dollar #Staβ¦
π₯35β€9π8π7π³5β€βπ₯3π3π₯°3
380++ PIPS #WHALEZONE FLY!! Luna selalu bilang buat pantau! Dimana ada Whale, ada Zone, disitu kita entryπ #WhalezoneJuara #HappyCuaaan #ILOVEUGOLD
π16π5β€4π³3β€βπ₯2π₯2π2π1
π³ #WHALEZONE UPDATE Gold try to rebound after PPI. Struktur bullish recovery mulai dominan selama bertahan di atas Zone Buy 1 Kotak Pink: SELL β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ Kotak Grey: BUY β¬οΈβ¬οΈβ¬οΈ Perhatikan 3 Zone yang Luna kasih. Perhatikan structure market and be careful!π #TrustWhalezone #TradeByDirection #Direction101
β€19π₯7π³5π2π2π2β1β€βπ₯1
Last day, bantu Luna tentukan Gold akan kemana! [π³π³π³] SELL AND DROP! [π₯π₯π₯] BUY REBOUND!
π₯78π³49β€βπ₯4π4π2β‘1π―1π₯°1
Selamat paagiii, salam Jumat berkah sayangku π
π31π8π7β€3π3β€βπ₯2π2π―2
NDB $30 BATCH 1 UDAH LANDING, SAYANGGG! π΅ Congrats buat 300 WINNERS yang terpilih! Tapii, belum selesai sampai sini yaa! Masih ada batch berikutnya yang bakal Luna spill π Buat yang belum kebagian? DONβT WORRY, BABY! Tungguin next event dari Luna, jangan lupa STANDBY & UNMUTE CHANNEL LUNA biar nggak ketinggalan info selanjutnya! Happy cuaanπ #NDBUpdate #NDB30Dollar #StayTunedWithLuna
π23π8π₯7π4β€3π3π2π¦2
+250 PIPS WIN PPIβΌοΈ Ambil profit kaliannnnn! Thanks for trusting me! πππ #WhalezoneJuara #MemangAjib
π16π9π₯8β€3π³2π«‘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 241 posts we hold for @LunaDanielOriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@LunaDanielOriginal edited 13 posts after it first published β the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too β this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βLuna Whale Zone π³β (@LunaDanielOriginal), 27,011 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LunaDanielOriginal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.