Marketing & affiliate โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -21,409. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 12,054โ39,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 04:50
15,265
-110
4 Nov 2026, 01:59
15,375
-30
3 Nov 2026, 02:41
15,405
-63
2 Nov 2026, 00:56
15,468
-82
1 Nov 2026, 01:58
15,550
-119
31 Oct 2026, 04:28
15,669
-168
30 Oct 2026, 03:59
15,837
-173
29 Oct 2026, 06:01
16,010
-232
28 Oct 2026, 02:28
16,242
-134
27 Oct 2026, 00:06
16,376
-110
26 Oct 2026, 01:29
16,486
-105
25 Oct 2026, 04:25
16,591
-102
24 Oct 2026, 03:26
16,693
-230
23 Oct 2026, 00:37
16,923
-138
22 Oct 2026, 01:27
17,061
-252
20 Oct 2026, 18:37
17,313
-173
19 Oct 2026, 17:48
17,486
-129
18 Oct 2026, 19:09
17,615
-132
17 Oct 2026, 16:45
17,747
-121
16 Oct 2026, 19:00
17,868
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 15 April 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
7.56%
avg views รท 15,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.79%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 October 2026
Posts held
32 (15 April 2026 โ 28 October 2026)
Views total
5,770
Reactions total
334
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 05:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
883
Videos
4
Links
864
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 5 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
3,202 reactions across 31 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
๐ฅ
701
21.9%
โค
633
19.8%
๐
610
19.1%
๐
489
15.3%
๐
446
13.9%
โคโ๐ฅ
90
2.81%
๐
88
2.75%
๐ฅฐ
84
2.62%
๐ฏ
30
0.937%
๐ณ
8
0.25%
๐คฉ
7
0.219%
โก
6
0.187%
๐จโ๐ป
6
0.187%
๐คฏ
4
0.125%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 3,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 15 April 2026 to 28 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
53
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 31 we hold a reading for ยท 61%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @MAKEMONEY_30. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 April 2026 to 28 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 0 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
๐ฅ ๐ฎ FOMC face-off: hold or surprise hike?
Markets put hike odds below 20%, but a hold does not mean a quiet market.
Vote now: A hold, B surprise hike.
BTC https://bingx.com/perpetual/BTC-USDT?ch=bingx_partnerevents_20261021&ref=PRFT9L
โ ๏ธ Market information only, not investment advice.
๐ข Tesla earnings: expectation vs reality
Expectation: revenue beats, the stock takes off ๐
Reality: revenue beats, the stock falls almost 15% the next day ๐ชฆ
This isn't a joke. It really happened in Q2: revenue cleared the bar, the 16.8% gross margin didn't, and the market voted with its feet. Consensus gross margin this quarter is 17.9%. However good revenue looks, check this number first.
Results at Oct 21 20:05 โฆ
๐ค Before Meta earnings, what is Zuckerberg thinking?
A. How to sell more glasses ๐ถ๏ธ
B. How to explain $145B in capex to Wall Street ๐ธ
The answer is B. In Q2 he raised the capex floor, and the stock fell 9% the next day. Wall Street isn't scared of him spending. It's scared he'll finish spending and then add more.
Results at Oct 21 20:00 UTC, earnings call at 20:30 UTC. Let's hear how he spins it. Long or short, thโฆ
๐ฅ August PCE came in in line with expectations: no surprise, and no cooling either.
๐ Energy is keeping inflation up and the core is stuck high, so the number was never low. In line means October hike expectations barely change.
๐ PCE set no new direction. The focus shifts to payrolls Oct 2 12:30 UTC.
๐ October won't be decided by one number, but by jobs, wages, inflation and oil together.
Long or short, one tap โฆ
๐ฅ August PCE is out Sep 30 12:30 UTC: the Fed just hiked in September, and this report decides whether it hikes again in October.
๐ Core PCE YoY is forecast at 3.3โ3.4%, still far from the 2% target. Energy is keeping inflation up and the core is stuck high, so even a small miss can move markets.
๐ Two scenarios: hotter, and the dollar strengthens while stocks, gold, and BTC tend to fall. Cooler, and it's the reverโฆ
๐ ETF Flow Report | Sep 23
US spot BTC ETFs: net inflow of $347M
ETH ETFs: net inflow of $105M
๐ When money comes in, dips get bought. When money leaves, leverage takes over. This time price moved first and ETFs followed a day or two later, so the question now is whether they keep following.
๐ The test: ETFs take in over $200M for 3 days in a row, read together with stablecoins and on-chain flows (thresholds on thโฆ
๐ฅ BTC pulling back? On Sep 23 it slipped from $87K to $84K. Watch three things: rate hikes, the TrumpโXi meeting, and leverage.
๐ The direct trigger: the US September flash PMI jumped to 58.4, the fastest output growth in over 5 years, and Brent climbed back above $100. Markets now fear more Fed hikes, the 10-year Treasury yield hit its highest since 2007, and risk assets pulled back together.
๐ But the money is stโฆ
๐ฅ The Nasdaq closed at a record two days in a row. Is BTC next? BTC hit $87K, up 13% in four days โ a near 8-month high, yet still 31% below its all-time high.
๐ The most direct driver: the US and China are heading to talks and signaling goodwill. Gold fell and money rotated back into risk assets. Add shorts forced to buy back, and the price kept climbing.
๐ Even more important is the money: price moved first, thenโฆ
๐ฅ Decision is in. The Fed hikes 25bp, taking the range to 3.75โ4.00%.
๐ The press conference is 30 minutes out โ that's where it can be turned around. Don't treat the first candle as the conclusion.
๐ A hike drains liquidity, so BTC takes the most direct hit. This is the market's base case โ the selling mostly happened before the meeting, so don't chase the first sharp drop after the decision.
๐ Across five 2026 dโฆ
๐ฅ Three years on, the Fed is finally about to hike โ odds 90+%, and the cut side is at 0% with nobody left betting on it. Miss this one and the next is 10/28.
๐ But priced this high, the selling already happened before the meeting. Historically, once the odds clear 80% the decision day is usually a narrow "buy the rumour, sell the fact" grind, not a one-way dump.
๐ This looks more like a credibility hike than 2022-โฆ
๐ฅ32๐31โค24๐23๐15
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @MAKEMONEY_30. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@MAKEMONEY_30 edited 1 post after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ก๐๐ก๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ข๐ ๐ธโ (@MAKEMONEY_30), 15,265 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MAKEMONEY_30.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.