MBMods by stefanoYG
Official channel
@MBMods
Official groups:
Portuguese group 🇧🇷🇵🇹:
@MBMods_pt
Grupo español:
@MBMods_es
Group indonesian 🇮🇩
@MBMods_id
Group for everyone in general:
@MBMods_group
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net -12,397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 450,905–467,022 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 01:37
452,765
-1,054
5 Sept 2026, 20:15
453,819
-592
3 Sept 2026, 18:36
454,411
-351
2 Sept 2026, 11:11
454,762
-442
1 Sept 2026, 12:34
455,204
-347
31 Aug 2026, 16:08
455,551
-547
30 Aug 2026, 17:05
456,098
-417
29 Aug 2026, 15:42
456,515
-410
28 Aug 2026, 12:43
456,925
-363
27 Aug 2026, 11:04
457,288
-206
26 Aug 2026, 07:58
457,494
-372
25 Aug 2026, 07:52
457,866
-373
24 Aug 2026, 10:32
458,239
-574
22 Aug 2026, 18:24
458,813
-92
21 Aug 2026, 09:53
458,905
-158
20 Aug 2026, 10:47
459,063
-260
19 Aug 2026, 09:47
459,323
-257
18 Aug 2026, 09:27
459,580
-294
17 Aug 2026, 09:48
459,874
-608
15 Aug 2026, 17:05
460,482
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 2 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.6%
avg views ÷ 452,765 subscribers
Avg views / post
84,400
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
22 (2 September 2025 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
168,700
Reactions total
3,310
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 14:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
170
Videos
40
Links
214
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
25,903 reactions across 22 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
17,258
66.6%
😱
1,661
6.41%
🔥
1,573
6.07%
👍
1,415
5.46%
🤩
1,413
5.45%
🎉
1,108
4.28%
👏
718
2.77%
❤🔥
424
1.64%
💯
333
1.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25,903 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 2 September 2025 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
361
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 22 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
132
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MBMods. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 September 2025 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚀 New Update 🚀
#MBWhatsApp v3.0
📆 15-08-2026
📝 Changes:
✨ New base updated to 2.26.19.73
~ Small changes and improvements
🪲 Any bug? report it @mbmods_reportbot
📎 Download and details:
👇🏻
https://mb-mods.net/mbwhatsapp/?a
How can I tell if my favorite WhatsApp mod contains this malware?
If you're an advanced user, you can inspect the APK using tools such as ApkEditor, ApkTool, or MT Manager.
1. Check the assets folder
If you find any of these files:
- "xprmtofk"
- "ydzntloe"
- "iintbpzx"
- "mieduyzc"
- "pdsydpnb"
- "wqncallq"
then the mod has been injected with this malicious code.
2. Check the DEX files
Open each ".dex" file a…
MBWhatsApp does not include hidden backdoors or malicious code designed to steal your data.
It also works with Google Play Protect enabled, so there's no need to disable your device's security features.
💪
⚠️ Warning!
A growing number of WhatsApp mods are quietly stealing your personal data.
That includes:
- Your phone number
- Your contacts' phone numbers
- Access to your messages
- Data from digital wallet apps (Binance and similar apps)
The collected information is then sent to a hidden private server.
After analyzing the hidden code, it raises every possible red flag. (See the image.)
What's even more concern…
🚀 New Update 🚀
#MBWhatsApp v2.8.1
📆 22-05-2026
📝 Changes:
🛠 A Temporary fix so some users can link.
ℹ️ Keep in mind that there is no 50%, 90% or 99% solution, don't be fooled.
📎 Download and details:
👇🏻
https://mb-mods.net/mbwhatsapp/?a
🚀 New Update 🚀
#MBWhatsApp v2.8.0
📆 23-03-2026
📝 Changes:
🛠 Fixed some Bugs
✨ New base updated to 2.26.7.75
✨ Added new UI for sharing attachments.
✨ Added button to mark messages as read
✨ Other minor changes, improvements and speed ✌️
🪲 Any bug? report it @mbmods_bot
📎 Download and details:
👇🏻
https://mb-mods.net/mbwhatsapp/?a
🚀 New Update 🚀
#MBWhatsApp v2.6.2
📆 28-02-2026
VERSION 2.6.2
✨ You can open links within Mbwhatsapp (without closing MBWhatsApp, without leaving a history and without ads; you can summarize the content with AI)
✨ Some fixeds bugs.
📝 Changes:
✨ Added: Scheduled messages
✨ Option to mention all members of a group when scheduling a message
✨ Now the edited message history highlights the differences between message…
🚀 New Update 🚀
#MBWhatsApp v2.6
📆 14-01-2026
📝 Changes:
✨ New base 2.25.37.76
✔️ New Blur effect when viewing a status
✔️ You can now preview a conversation by pressing and holding it in the conversation list.
✔️ New style for viewing edited messages
✔️ Options to disable background blur in statuses and preview chats
✔️ Other minor changes
⭐️ Other new things and other arrangements that I've forgotten ✌️
🪲 Any …
❤669🔥71👍53🤩34❤🔥21😱21🎉17💯15
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @MBMods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
TurboTel @TurboTel · 131,229 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 9 September 2026
InstaZen | iOS INSTAGRAM @STinsta_official · 44,136 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 15 here — alongside 14 others — read 9 September 2026
Coolest Tech @Coolesttech · 216,836 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 9 here — alongside 8 others — read 9 September 2026
Honista @Honistagram · 530,640 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
2 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MBMods” (@MBMods), 452,765 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MBMods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.