Channel
@MCnezhdanchik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
219subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001879794414 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MCnezhdanchik |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MCnezhdanchik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 219 | -1 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 220 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 220 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
311 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404651914593836721 | 97 | 31.2% | |
| custom 5463330784288985835 | 56 | 18.0% | |
| custom 5194936551385086204 | 54 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5235589164166032324 | 50 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5298818152279326764 | 22 | 7.07% | |
| custom 5353060840448727534 | 18 | 5.79% | |
| custom 5463329250985656403 | 5 | 1.61% | |
| custom 5366059786603349477 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.29% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.322% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 311 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как ощущается рандомный четверг, когда билеты в один конец уже куплены
custom 546333078428898583517custom 540465191459383672110custom 53530608404487275349custom 52988181522793267644custom 54633292509856564032👀1
2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣2️⃣ | 2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣ Последний пост про волонтёрство! Честно-честно! В 2022 году, после пары активных месяцев в волонтёрском центре Вышки, я решила податься на первое крупное мероприятие, к тому же сразу тимлидером. Это был МФГУ 2022, с которого и начался мой путь в Мосволонтере. На первом фото я как раз на обучении управленцев этого мероприятия, вся такая серьёзная и решительная! За 4 года я успела побыват…
custom 540465191459383672122custom 546333078428898583520custom 523558916416603232416custom 54633292509856564033custom 51949365513850862041
Не верится, что это наконец произошло… Могу сказать только одно – спасибо Плехановке за людей. Всем, с кем меня свёл РЭУ за эти 4 года, передаю мои крепчайшие объятия, вы лучшие 🫶
custom 540465191459383672126custom 529881815227932676418custom 546333078428898583517custom 53660597866033494774custom 51949365513850862043custom 53530608404487275341
Чунга-чанга, мои дорогие подписчики 🪳
custom 519493655138508620433custom 540465191459383672126custom 523558916416603232418custom 53530608404487275348custom 54633307842889858351
Феномен Коржа или как я уснула в Москве, а проснулась в Стамбуле Вечером одной пятницы мы с сестрой сели смотреть сериал, как вдруг мне пришло сообщение: «прилетай на концерт». Путём сложных махинаций на следующий день я уже заходила на танцпол стадиона Бешикташ. Никогда не считала себя фанатом Макса Коржа, но в тот день полностью прочувствовала, почему же его так любят. В его творчестве нет революционных звучаний …
custom 519493655138508620417custom 523558916416603232416custom 540465191459383672113💯4custom 54633307842889858351
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @MCnezhdanchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mc_nezhdanchik” (@MCnezhdanchik), 219 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MCnezhdanchik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.