Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MD Club Everything About Medicine

Channel

MD Club Everything About Medicine

@MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

400subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002161451189
TypeChannel
Username@MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39940140018 August 2026 — 401 subscribers19 August 2026 — 401 subscribers26 August 2026 — 399 subscribers10 September 2026 — 400 subscribers18 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 399–401 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 17:39400+1
26 Aug 2026, 01:34399-2
19 Aug 2026, 07:52401no change
18 Aug 2026, 21:31401first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 22 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1768.0%
💘832.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 17:47 UTC131 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

من الاشياء يلي كانت تفيدني بالمراجعة هي الملخصات يلي تشمل النقاط الاساسية لكل مرض اذا فاهم الموضوع وتريد ملخص حتى تتذكر الامراض باختصار and on point هذا المصدر كلش مفيد يشمل كل مواضيع الطب لهذا يكون ضخم ، تكدرون تروحون على section يلي تحتاجون بيه مراجعة سريعة للمواضيع قبل لا تحلون اسئلة حتى تستذكرون النقاط الاساسية لكل مرض من اسمه revision notes for medical exams

🍓2

16 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC172 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🍓بوت متخصص بالاسئلة ومقسم حسب المواضيع جدا جميل ومفيد لطلبة الرابعة الى السادسة بيه قسم ال basic للمراحل الاولية لكن ما اطلعت عليها شخصياً الترتيب مثلما موضح بالصور @SynapseStudyBot

🍓2

3 Jun 2026, 11:11 UTC202 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💘3

22 May 2026, 12:54 UTC265 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

🍥

  1. Digoxin effectively prevents recurrence of the arrhythmia23%
  2. Anticoagulation is not necessary3%
  3. Sotalol may be effective10%
  4. Amiodarone should be avoided17%
  5. Flecainide orally may be an effective as-needed treatment to abort an attack47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🍓2

22 May 2026, 12:52 UTC198 viewsread 18 August 2026

🍥 A 69-year-old woman complains of intermittent palpitations, lasting several hours, which then stop spontaneously. She also suffers from asthma. Holter monitoring confirms paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the management of this patient?

22 May 2026, 12:05 UTC183 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

🍥

  1. Mi5%
  2. Stable angina0%
  3. Unstable angina20%
  4. Anxiety0%
  5. Variant angina75%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 12:04 UTC140 viewsread 18 August 2026

🍥 A 44-year-old woman attends her local accident and emergency department with a history of at least six months of frequent central chest pain in the early morning or during the night. She had no chest pain on exertion. This had been a particularly severe attack, lasting over 2 hours. Her pulse rate is 84/minute in sinus rhythm, and blood pressure is 134/86 mmHg. The ECG shows anterior ST segment elevation, but tropo

22 May 2026, 11:39 UTC111 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

A IV low-molecular weight heparin (A) should almost always form part of the immediate management of an acute coronary syndrome, such as in this case. If the patient were not already on a beta-blocker this would also be given. At this point it would be classified as unstable angina as there is no evidence of actual tissue damage. Thrombolysis (B) probably worsens outcomes in this situation. In the absence of actual th

💘3

22 May 2026, 11:38 UTC106 viewsread 18 August 2026
Poll

🍓What would be the most appropriate next step in his management?

  1. IV low-molecular weight heparin30%
  2. Thrombolysis with alteplase0%
  3. IV nicardapine10%
  4. Angiography with stenting40%
  5. Oral clopidogrel20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 May 2026, 12:54 UTCAnonymous Quiz30 voters

🍥

  1. Digoxin effectively prevents recurrence of the arrhythmia23%
  2. Anticoagulation is not necessary3%
  3. Sotalol may be effective10%
  4. Amiodarone should be avoided17%
  5. Flecainide orally may be an effective as-needed treatment to abort an attack47%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz20 voters

🍥

  1. Mi5%
  2. Stable angina0%
  3. Unstable angina20%
  4. Anxiety0%
  5. Variant angina75%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 11:38 UTCFinal Results10 voters

🍓What would be the most appropriate next step in his management?

  1. IV low-molecular weight heparin30%
  2. Thrombolysis with alteplase0%
  3. IV nicardapine10%
  4. Angiography with stenting40%
  5. Oral clopidogrel20%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 May 2026, 08:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz24 voters

🍥

  1. Metoprolol4%
  2. Morphine21%
  3. Metoclopramide13%
  4. Aspirin50%
  5. Streptokinase13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 22 May 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شبكة نجفيون الجامعية 🎓
@NajafeoonH · 80,880
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
جامعة الكوفة/University of Kufa
@University_of_Kufa · 28,564
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MD Club Everything About Medicine” (@MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine), 400 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MDClubEverythingAboutMedicine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.