Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for МИФ.Курсы

Channel

МИФ.Курсы

@MIFcourses

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,572subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001057524654
TypeChannel
Username@MIFcourses
DescriptionНовости о курсах МИФа, прямые эфиры с экспертами, статьи, чек-листы, гайды и другая польза Основной канал МИФа: @mifbooks Больше о курсах МИФа: mif.to/mifcursy Регистрация в РКН № 4928418885 https://vk.cc/cGwutx
Created2 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MIFcourses

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

26,56326,58126,5725 August 2026 — 26,569 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,569 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,570 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,569 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,574 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,573 subscribers10 August 2026 — 26,578 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,581 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,579 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,574 subscribers15 August 2026 — 26,572 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,573 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,571 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,570 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,567 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,565 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,563 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,566 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,570 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,569 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,572 subscribers5 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,560–26,584 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 06:4426,572+3
29 Aug 2026, 06:3526,569-1
28 Aug 2026, 06:3426,570+4
26 Aug 2026, 08:2626,566+3
25 Aug 2026, 08:1726,563-2
24 Aug 2026, 11:0526,565-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:0326,567-3
20 Aug 2026, 05:1126,570-1
17 Aug 2026, 22:4426,571-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:0326,573+1
15 Aug 2026, 10:3426,572-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:1726,574-5
12 Aug 2026, 21:0626,579-2
12 Aug 2026, 00:4226,581+4
11 Aug 2026, 01:0126,577-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:2426,578+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:5226,573-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:5426,574+5
7 Aug 2026, 04:0026,569-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:4026,570first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.81%
avg views ÷ 26,572 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,540
65 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.773%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
65
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 65 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held65 (2 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total100,389
Reactions total759
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5,510
Videos
206
Links
2,470

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

750 reactions across 62 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31742.3%
🔥10013.3%
😁668.80%
💯496.53%
💘415.47%
❤‍🔥324.27%
🥰324.27%
👍222.93%
😍131.73%
💔111.47%
81.07%
😢81.07%
👏70.933%
😱70.933%
🤣70.933%
🎉60.8%
🤩60.8%
40.533%
👀40.533%
🤷‍♀40.533%
5 further kinds60.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC959 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Книжный редактор — это не тот, кто проверяет, правильно ли в тексте расставлены запятые. Это менеджер, дирижер, который руководит большим оркестром. Он исследует потребности аудитории и тренды рынка, чтобы затем из сотен рукописей выбрать именно те, которые полюбят читатели. После занимается планированием бюджета, поиском исполнителей и взаимодействует с огромным количеством людей: писателями, литредами, иллюстратора

6

28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC≈4,650 views16 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Если бы исторические личности вели блоги, то… И у них были бы хейтеры 🫠 Пофантазировали, как бы выглядели посты великих и комментарии к ним. Часто желание завести блог разбивается именно о страх осуждения. Негативная реакция будет всегда: чем бы вы ни занимались и о чем бы ни писали. Но вот с парализующим страхом можно (и нужно!) работать — ведь только так можно реализовать мечту и открыто говорить о том, что для ва

🔥9😁43

28 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC≈1,040 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Первые шаги в копирайтинге, или 10 советов новичкам 🪶 Выпускница нашего курса «Текст как инструмент» Лилия Юмаева написала 10 советов для тех, кто присматривается к профессии копирайтера. Сегодня опубликуем для вас первые 5. Сохраняйте, чтобы не забыть. Читайте регулярно Желательно каждый день браться за чтение. Пусть это будут разные жанры: от классики до эзотерики. Это улучшает насмотренность и помогает легче изл

53

27 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,070 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Уроки магии вместо законов физики. Лешие, домовые и другие сказочные (или реальные?..) существа вместо скучных параграфов. А еще разговоры про аниме, эльфов Толкина и Апокалипсис вместо непонятных формул. Наш большой цикл лекций «Культурные коды» похож на школу мечты 💕 «Культурные коды» — это почти 50 лекций, объединенные в 12 тем обо всем на свете: от мифов о душе и шаманах до этносов, философии и скрытых смыслов л

7🔥5

27 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,060 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Хотите сделать первые шаги к собственной книге? Приглашаем вас в «Мастерскую автора» — это две недели практики с МИФом в закрытом телеграм-канале ✨ Вас ждут упражнения, полезные материалы, шаблоны и техники, которые помогут побороть страх чистого листа и начать писать. Вы научитесь справляться с прокрастинацией, страхами и сомнениями, превращать идеи в текст и искать свой писательский ритм. Из заметок вы начнете соб

6

27 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,040 views21 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Было у вас такое, что вы думали: «Вот бы книгу написать»? А может вы уже много лет вынашиваете в голове идею истории, представляете отдельные сцены, персонажей, делаете заметки, но почему-то никак не сядете за ноутбук? Как думаете, что вам мешает начать писать? 😢 — времени нет: то одно, то другое… 💔 — боюсь, что получится ерунда, которая никому не будет интересна 🤷‍♀️— просто не знаю, с чего начать

💔9😢8🤷‍♀4

26 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,090 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

✨ Открыли запись на новый поток курса «Литературная редактура» ✨ Первый запуск «Литературной редактуры» стал настоящей сенсацией — желающих учиться оказалось в разы больше, чем мы ожидали. Разумеется, сразу стало понятно, что второму потоку — быть! Приходите, если хотите освоить новую профессию или достичь мастерства в саморедактуре. Вы погрузитесь во все аспекты: от стилистических до научных и юридических. В прогр

🔥73🎉2

26 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Делитесь в комментариях, сколько у вас правильных ответов. А если хотите больше узнать о свадебных традициях предков, приходите на новый лекторий, который стартует 10 сентября. В качестве одного из экспертов выступит автор книги «Русская свадьба» — доктор филологических наук, фольклорист и литературовед Елена Самоделова 🍭 Промокод КУРСЫ увеличит скидку на сайте до 15% 🎨 🖼 «Девичник», Алексей Корзухин, 1889

6

26 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 28 August 2026
Poll

После венчания молодых встречали в доме мужа. В XVIII веке описывали обычай класть перед их приходом под порог…

  1. калач7%
  2. подкову36%
  3. красную нитку25%
  4. открытый замок18%
  5. солонку и колючий шиповник13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,010 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

На Руси был обычай, похожий на современное бросание букета или подвязки. Только жених бросал через плечо…

  1. рюмку4%
  2. банный веник25%
  3. кокошник19%
  4. сапог52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,000 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Перед первой брачной ночью постель молодых могли заранее «греть», или «обминать». Как это делали?

  1. клали на постель кошку1%
  2. предварительно грели одеяло у печи23%
  3. на постель ложилась супружеская пара из старших родственников69%
  4. на постели прыгали друзья жениха6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👀1

26 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,020 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

Одна из традиций — предсвадебная баня невесты. Воде после омовения приписывали особую силу и использовали для…

  1. мытья других незамужних девушек37%
  2. приготовления свадебных пирогов6%
  3. стирки свадебного наряда13%
  4. мытья полов в доме жениха45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😱5

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @MIFcourses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTCAnonymous Quiz67 voters

После венчания молодых встречали в доме мужа. В XVIII веке описывали обычай класть перед их приходом под порог…

  1. калач7%
  2. подкову36%
  3. красную нитку25%
  4. открытый замок18%
  5. солонку и колючий шиповник13%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:37 UTCAnonymous Quiz75 voters

На Руси был обычай, похожий на современное бросание букета или подвязки. Только жених бросал через плечо…

  1. рюмку4%
  2. банный веник25%
  3. кокошник19%
  4. сапог52%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

Перед первой брачной ночью постель молодых могли заранее «греть», или «обминать». Как это делали?

  1. клали на постель кошку1%
  2. предварительно грели одеяло у печи23%
  3. на постель ложилась супружеская пара из старших родственников69%
  4. на постели прыгали друзья жениха6%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz87 voters

Одна из традиций — предсвадебная баня невесты. Воде после омовения приписывали особую силу и использовали для…

  1. мытья других незамужних девушек37%
  2. приготовления свадебных пирогов6%
  3. стирки свадебного наряда13%
  4. мытья полов в доме жениха45%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz93 voters

Если сватовство прошло успешно, в доме невесты обе семьи устраивали важное застолье, которое называлось…

  1. помолвка23%
  2. невестин обед33%
  3. пропой16%
  4. предсвадебный пир9%
  5. кутеж19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,282 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Издательство МИФ
@mifbooks · 54,801
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Google Таблицы
@google_sheets · 60,723
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 August 2026
Книжный Лис 🦊📚
@booksfox · 48,097
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“МИФ.Курсы” (@MIFcourses), 26,572 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MIFcourses.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.