Инфографика | Продвижение | Маркетплейсы pinned a photo

Channel
Инфографика | Продвижение | Маркетплейсы
@MPdesigns
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,757subscribers
+59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001638689480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MPdesigns |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MPdesigns |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 30,757 | -19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:26 | 30,776 | -26 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 30,802 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 30,804 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 30,817 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 30,830 | +24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 30,806 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 30,799 | +23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 30,776 | +182 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 30,594 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 30,610 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 30,620 | +26 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 30,594 | -14 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 30,608 | -26 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 30,634 | -33 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 30,667 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 30,678 | +25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 30,653 | +20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 30,633 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 30,653 | first reading |
Engagement
116 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.96%
- avg views ÷ 30,757 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 602
- 104 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.201%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 116
- of 116 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 116 (2 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 62,583 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
47 reactions across 29 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 68.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 8.51% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 116 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 116 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Комплексный аудит веб-проектов Сайт выглядит стильно, но теряет клиентов? Идеальный код бесполезен, если интерфейс тормозит, а логика запутывает пользователя. Предлагаем провести аудит-диагностику вашего сайта и показываем реальную картину: 📝 Смыслы и Наполнение: Указываем на нелогичности, смысловые несостыковки и ошибки в наполнении сайта. Вскрываем тупиковые сценарии и обман ожиданий (Broken Promises). ⚡️ Front…
❤1
Привет!👋 Я, Мира — нейродизайнер инфографики для Wildberries🛍️и Ozon 🛍️. Создаю современные изображения для карточек товаров: от разработки визуальной концепции до полного комплекта инфографики. Ссылка на портфолио: https://t.me/mira_visual
❤1
Как спецу на маркетплейсах стабильно находить клиентов в 2026 году Я выстроил систему, благодаря которой я продаю услуги почти каждому третьему клиенту. Результат — 245 400 ₽ за август 2026 на услугах менеджера маркетплейсов Без — откликов на вакансии — рассылок резюме — портфолио и кейсов Я повторяю 4 действия, которые стабильно приводят мне клиентов Хочу поделиться этим способом с тобой Узнать про этот способ…
✨ НИКА | ДИЗАЙНЕР ИНФОГРАФИКИ ✨ Превращаю сложные идеи в понятные visual-истории и продающие карточки ПОЧЕМУ ВЫБИРАЮТ МЕНЯ: · 🚀 Результат за 24–48 часов — четкое соблюдение дедлайнов и связь 24/7. · 🔥 Выделение среди конкурентов — глубокий анализ ниши перед стартом работы. · 🎨 Индивидуальный стиль — современный, эстетичный и продуманный дизайн. · 🛡 Гарантия качества — бесплатные правки до …
Кто я, как думаю над проектом и что в итоге получает клиент? Помогаю брендам и продавцам превращать преимущества товара в визуал, который быстрее объясняет свою ценность и заметнее выглядит среди конкурентов. ✅ Мои работы, подход и условия здесь: ✨ https://lizadesign.ru/ ✨
+11 000 ₽ за вечер Дима из Перми, маляр, собрал ИИ-подборщика цвета по готовому шаблону за вечер — и заработал 11 000р., не выходя из дома. А Екатерина из Таджикистана вышла на 100 000р. уже в первый месяц работы с нейронками. И это не случайность. В 2026 году бизнес по всей России массово внедряет ИИ, чтобы автоматически создавать тексты, фото и видео для соцсетей и маркетплейсов. Компаниям нужны люди, которые …
❤1
⚡Привет! Меня зовут Полина и я создаю продающий ДИЗАЙН карточек для ваших товаров на Wildberries и Ozon 📍СКИДКА 10% НА ПЕРВЫЙ ЗАКАЗ 👉 Максимально погружусь в ваш товар 👉 Анализирую конкурентов и нахожу боли потенциальных клиентов 👉 Подбираю цветовое решение, которое максимально выделит ваш товар в ленте 🙏 Учитываю все пожелания клиента при разработке дизайна Моё портфолио: @Polina_infdsgn
Ищем дизайнера‑инфографиста для fashion‑бренда на маркетплейсах (WB/Ozon). Нужен специалист, который превращает визуал в продажи. Требования: опыт работы с карточками маркетплейсов, уверенное владение Figma и Photoshop, навыки работы с нейросетями, самостоятельность, ориентация на результат. Плюс — базовые навыки монтажа коротких видео. Задачи: дизайн карточек и рич‑контента, генерация контента через ИИ, ретушь и а…
📍Портфолио: https://t.me/Shlyachinaanna Работаю с любым товаром.✅ ✨ Хотите, чтобы ваш товар выделялся и привлекал больше покупателей? Меня зовут Анна. Разрабатываю стильный дизайн, понятную структуру и акцентирую внимание на преимуществах товара. 📦 Работаю с ТЗ и без него, могу подобрать фото и продумать концепцию. ✅ 💰Стоимость — ❗️300 ₽ за слайд. 📩 Telegram: @Shlyachina
❤1
Как спецу на маркетплейсах стабильно находить клиентов в 2026 году Без — откликов на вакансии — рассылок резюме — портфолио и кейсов Сейчас я просто повторяю 4 действия, которые стабильно приводят мне клиентов подойдет — Менеджерам маркетплейсов — Дизайнерам инфографики Узнать про этот способ — здесь👇 Я менеджер маркетплейсов Я дизайнер карточек
❤1
Веду 3 проекта из дома по 40к — на карте +120.000 в месяц, пока ты сидишь на окладе 60к Кто-то едет на «любимую работу» к 8 утра, а кто-то запускает этого бота, следуют пошаговой инструкции и получают +3.000 - 4.000 рублей за пару часов работы. Эти люди не программисты и у них даже нет высшего образования. Они всего лишь освоили профессию технического специалиста, где нет ничего сложного. И за это им готовы платить…
Showing the 12 most recent of 116 posts we hold for @MPdesigns. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 196,408 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@other_digital_bot · 28,8154 postsИнфографика для маркетплейсов wb, ozon, помощь в оформлении визуала
@infograficaDaryaV · 402 postsМенеджер Озон
@ozon_top111 · 1062 postsДизайнер Инфографики WB/OZON
@alekseevna_design39 · 3471 postАнна | Веб-дизайнер
@an_888888_portfolio · 111 postАнгелина | Инфографика | Коммерческий дизайн
@angelina_market_design · 1461 postAs Import
@AS_IMPORT_AS · 651 postДизайнер Алена | Инфографика и сайты
@design_houseee · 1621 postЯрослав | Твой дизайнер
@designer_from_Siberia · 1171 postДизайн карточек WB/OZON/ЯНДЕКС
@disaynWBOZON · 171 postИра/Инфографика для Wildberries/Ozon/Нейровизуал
@infograph_AI_designer_irina · 551 postИНФОГРАФИКА |карточки Wildberries&Ozon|
@infographic_soplight2 · 41 postЕкатерина *Дизайнер инфографики
@KaterinaMalovadesigner · 41 postДаша • made by D.
@madebydashh · 501 postМенеджер Wildberries / Ирина
@menedgerfedinchikIrina · 11 postPrime Cards | WB & Ozon инфографика
@PrimeCardsWB_OZON · 11 postДизайнер Виктория Волошник / ИНФОГРАФИКА / Рич-контент / Видеообложка / Ozon / WB
@viktoriaYdalenka · 801 postТочка роста Яхнис | Маркетплейсы
@yahnis_market · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MPdesigns named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 22 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 15 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@udafrii · 54,156
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
@freelancce · 62,801
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Инфографика | Продвижение | Маркетплейсы” (@MPdesigns), 30,757 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MPdesigns.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.