🎮 $ZELDA cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $20.7K MC, 13 min before migration. → ATH $371.2K in 2.5h (18x gap). Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @alpha_wave1 — $20.7K • @coinsmaster1 — $20.7K • @autorunalert — $34.9K Zelda-themed news meme on Solana. Not affiliated with Nintendo. MWX Alpha Take: Called on the curve. Speedrun to ATH in 2.5h. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn

Channel
MWX Announcements
@MWXAnnouncements
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,669subscribers
-2,327 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003916991681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MWXAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 15 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MWXAnnouncements |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:15 | 9,669 | -79 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:06 | 9,748 | -46 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 9,794 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 9,812 | -79 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 9,891 | -12 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 9,903 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 22:47 | 9,918 | -16 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 9,934 | -34 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 9,968 | -36 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:22 | 10,004 | -194 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 10,198 | -1,253 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 11,451 | -22 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 11,473 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:38 | 11,485 | -9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 11,494 | -25 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 11,519 | -24 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:14 | 11,543 | -29 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:54 | 11,572 | -25 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:52 | 11,597 | -23 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:48 | 11,620 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.997%
- avg views ÷ 9,669 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 96.4
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.48%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (15 June 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,831 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 80
- Videos
- 13
- Links
- 90
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 44s
- Average length
- 27s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 33 | 44.0% | |
| ❤ | 25 | 33.3% | |
| custom 5285224666686854785 | 17 | 22.7% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🐶 A Meme Dog (AMD on Solana) cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $53.4K MC → ATH $3.69M ~2h later (69x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @knight_caller11 — $53.4K • @alpha_wave1 — $53.4K • @autorunalert — $53.4K 🔭 Scout Cat: 2 tracked wallets in at $29.9K MC, 3 min before the first KOL call: 123x to ATH. MWX Alpha Take: The wallets moved before the KOLs did. That's why we track …
🙈 Blind Ape cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $70.3K MC. → ATH $1.79M ~42h later (25x gap). Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @autorunalert — $70.3K • @bitecong — $70.3K • @dex_kolwatcher — $70.3K 🔭 Scout Cat: 2 tracked wallets in at $180.8K MC, ~2h after the first call → 9.9x to ATH. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
❤2
👄 $DESSA cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $358.1K MC. → ATH $33.3M ~5 days later (93x gap) Calls MWX Alpha tracked: • @legend_britney — $358.1K • @inizizi — $478.6K • @solcallermike — $7.3M Meme named after Block's new voice AI. Not a Block product. MWX Alpha Take: Only 3 tracked calls. The first came 68h before the breakout. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
🐺 $WOFL cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $60.5K MC. → ATH $842.8K ~4.5h later (13x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @wikikol1 — $60.5K • @johncryptopeow — $60.5K • @legend_britney — $201.0K Wolf meme on Robinhood Chain, not an official Robinhood product. MWX Alpha Take: 13x in ~4.5h. Even the flush after bottomed ~3x above the first call. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
🌊 $FLOAT cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $235.6K MC → $1.73M within 30 min → ATH $2.48M in ~3h (10x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @autorunalert — $235.6K • @cryptokind1408 — $211.3K • @ghost_sniper001 — $728.5K Platform token of a memecoin launchpad on Solana. MWX Alpha Take: 7x landed in the first 30 minutes. Real-time is the edge. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
🧙 $NTRNDM cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $42.8K MC, 26 min before migration → ATH $1.24M 18 days later (28x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @narutoumuzaki — $42.8K • @autorunalert — $72.8K • @chanpeng_satosh — $93.4K Wizard-branded launch-tools ecosystem token on Solana. MWX Alpha Take: Called on the curve. 18 days of grind before the ATH. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
⭕ $NOTHING cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $24.1K MC → ATH $832.6K in under 6h (34x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @knight_caller11 — $24.1K • @autorunalert — $86.1K • @alpha_wave1 — $86.1K 🔭 Scout Cat: 2 tracked wallets in at $44.8K MC, 3 min after the first call → 18.6x to ATH. "Backed by belief" meme: no roadmap, no product, on purpose. MWX Alpha Take: Backed by nothi…
❤2
⭐ $PRESIDENT cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $85.1K MC → ATH $477.7K in under 2h (5.6x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @alph_gems — $85.1K • @autorunalert — $124.0K • @johncryptopeow — $85.1K Election-themed meme on Solana. Not affiliated with any candidate, campaign, or government. MWX Alpha Take: Under 2h from first call to ATH. Prices aren't polls. ➡️ See what's being …
😼 $LUKE cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $108.9K MC on Oct 19. → ATH $1.50M on Oct 22 (13x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @autorunalert — $108.9K • @dex_kolwatcher — $221.4K • @solman10ijkl — $239.8K Monero-themed meme on Solana. No Monero privacy features. Not affiliated with the Monero project. The mid-run dip to ~$260K held 2.4x above the first call. Then the new high. …
🥬 $KIMCHI cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $5.3M MC, minutes after launch. → ATH $47.6M 18h later (9x gap) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @solanamemesscan — $5.3M • @pumpwatch1 — $5.3M • @autorunalert — $5.3M ⚠️ Two contracts trade as "Aura Final Boss." The one tracked here: CSocnzcRpgSCr1naKcNTieWZUxb6rABe45j844m7pump MWX Alpha Take: Calls ≠ distribution. Check the holders. ➡…
🐱 $MCAT cluster caught early. MWX Alpha tracked the first call at $15.1K MC on Sep 20 → ATH $869.9K on Oct 6 (57x gain) Top early callers caught by MWX Alpha: • @dexevents_miu — $15.1K • @cryptowildgem — $28.4K • @nobleirons7de — $59.9K Leg 1: $15K → $157K. Dipped to $50K. Then leg 2. MWX Alpha Take: The first call came before both legs. ➡️ See what's being tracked rn
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @MWXAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What chain do you trade on?
- SOL51%
- ETH9%
- Base16%
- BSC11%
- None of the above31%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@MWXAnnouncements named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 5 November 2026 – 6 November 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 November 2026 – 6 November 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 November 2026 – 6 November 2026
named in 2 posts, 5 November 2026 – 6 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MWX Announcements” (@MWXAnnouncements), 9,669 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MWXAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.