9 measurements spanning 26 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,803–8,826 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Sept 2026, 18:43
8,817
-1
30 Aug 2026, 16:15
8,818
+2
24 Aug 2026, 23:24
8,816
-7
21 Aug 2026, 00:53
8,823
+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:13
8,822
+8
14 Aug 2026, 07:25
8,814
+6
11 Aug 2026, 01:33
8,808
-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:34
8,811
+5
7 Aug 2026, 14:32
8,806
first reading
Engagement
42 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 8,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
586
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.659%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 42 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
42 (20 July 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
14,071
Reactions total
87
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 10s
Average length
11m 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
140 reactions across 34 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
96
68.6%
👍
14
10.0%
😁
12
8.57%
👏
8
5.71%
🍓
6
4.29%
🔥
4
2.86%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 140 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 42 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @M_Information11. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
خيوط سريرية | Clinical Clues 💡
رجل عمره 40 سنة وصل للطوارئ بسبب ألم شديد ومفاجئ في الصدر منذ ساعة، مع تعرّق شديد وغثيان.
العلامات الحيوية:
BP: 82/50 mmHg
HR: 48/min
RR: 22/min
SpO₂: 95%
بالفحص:
الجلد بارد ورطب.
JVD واضح.
الرئتان صافيتان، ولا توجد crackles.
لا توجد علامات نزيف.
السؤال: ما التشخيص الأكثر احتمالًا؟
A) Septic shock
B) Right ventricular myocardial infarction
C) Massive pulmonary embolism
D) Cardiac tamp…
جرعة صبر | A Dose of Patience 🩺🤍
«في الطب، لا يُقاس الصبر بغياب الألم، بل بالقدرة على الاستمرار رغم وجوده؛ فبعض حالات الشفاء تحتاج وقتًا بقدر ما تحتاج علاجًا.»
“ In medicine, patience is not measured by the absence of pain, but by the ability to keep going despite it; some healing requires as much time as it requires treatment.” 🩺🤍
@M_Information11..✨
If CrCl ≥15 mL/min: 15 mg PO q12hr for 21 days, THEN 20 mg PO qDay for 3 months
If CrCl <15 mL/min: Avoid use
مهم جدااا تاخد بالك من وظائف الكلى وتحسب ال
CrCl ..
🚩®Apixaban®
==============
®Eliquis® ( Elimbosis & Apixatrack & etc)
10 mg PO BID x 7 days, then 5 mg BID
⚡In Renal insufficiency
No dose adjustment recommended; not studied in ESRD on dialysis or patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min; dosing recommendation…
•Calf swelling 3 cm greater that the other leg, measured 10 cm below the tibial tuberosity
(1️⃣ point)
•Pitting edema greater in the symptomatic leg (1️⃣ point)
•Collateral non varicose superficial veins
(1️⃣ point)
•Active cancer or cancer treated within six months (1️⃣ point)
•Alternative diagnosis more likely than DVT (eg, Baker's cyst, cellulitis, muscle damage, postphlebitic syndrome, inguinal lymphadenopat…
___
ايه الفحوصات اللى المفروض تتعمل لإثبات تشخيص ال DVT ؟! 🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫🧑🏫
___
🔶 بنقسمها كالاتى ⤵️
✓Specific investigations
✓ basic investigations
✓ investigations for underlying cause
⚡Specific investigations🛑
=======================
#Labs :
- D.dimer , this done only if you apply pretest probability score
كمان لازم تعرف أن ال D-dimer ده بيعلى فى حاجات تانيه كتير اهما ال renal insufficie…
🌅Virchow triad
⬇️⬇️⬇️
✍️ Venous stasis
✍️ Hypercoagulability
✍️ Endothelial Injury
♦️Venous stasis
==============
#Immobilization
وده اهم واشهر سبب على الإطلاق وهو أن المريض يكون bedridden وغير قادر على المشى لاى سبب من الأسباب الاتيه
- After fractures & trauma
- Hemiplegic & para/quadriplegic person
- Severe joint problem
- Morbid obesity
- critically ill patients with prolonged recumbency
- Persons …
🌴 اعراض جلطة أوردة الساق ؟ 🌴
~~~
Clinical features of DVT
===================
🛑 DVTs could be Asymptomatic and Called " SILENT DVT"
وده بيحدث فى نسبه مش قليله من المرضى و بردو ممكن تؤدى إلى حدوث PUL .EMBOLISM
Symptoms of DVT
==============
🛑Swelling and edema of the affected limb
It is the most specific symptom
🛑Leg pain occurs in 50% of patients but is nonspecific , sometimes the patient can't wa…
---🎯الجلطه الوريديه” DVT from A to Z ” 🎯---
_1️⃣_
DEEP VENOUS THROMBOSIS
------------------------------------------------
⚡Sites of DVT .
⚡Pathophysiology of DVT that leads to
Pulmonary embolism
⚡Clinical features of DVT
⚡Complications of DVT
⚡Pre-test probability ( Well's score )
⚡Causes ( provoked vs Unprovoked DVT)
⚡Diagnostic workup for unprovoked DVT
and thrombop…
💡| حالة طبية :
ممارس صحي نقلت إليه
امرأة عمرها 45 من أمس فيها ألم حاد بالمعدة وتقلصات وانتفاخ وغثيان... مع انتفاض وتقلصات حادة في الجهة اليسرى من البطن وإسهال حاد.
فعل لها أدوية كثيرة كانت حالتها تتحسن شوي ويرجع كل شي مثل ماكان.
الأدوية الذي أعطاها بدون فحوصات مخبرية ولا فحص سريري :
Pantoprazole
Metronidazole
Emeset (Ondansetron)
Ringer’s Lactate
No-Spa (Drotaverine)
Antinal (Nifuroxazide)
Dramenex (Dimenhydrinate…
🩺 | حالة تفاعلية :
رجل عمره 67 سنة لديه تاريخ من Atrial fibrillation، ولا يتناول مضاد تخثر بانتظام.
وصل للطوارئ بسبب ألم شديد ومفاجئ في البطن منذ 4 ساعات.
يقول إن الألم شديد جدًا ولا يتناسب مع شدة الألم عند فحص البطن.
العلامات الحيوية:
BP: 95/60 mmHg
HR: 125/min
RR: 26/min
SpO₂: 97%
الفحص:
البطن لين نسبيًا.
يوجد ألم منتشر، لكن لا يوجد Rigidity أو Rebound tenderness واضح.
المريض شاحب ومتعرق.
التحاليل:
WBC: 19,000/µL
…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @M_Information11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مصطلحات طبية @medical_term · 41,197 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
كن قويا | Be Strong تحفيزات ، @Dr7step · 40,310 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
💊 ثقافة صحية طبية 😉(اساسيات طبطوب) @drtabtob · 65,889 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
حالات سريرية وأدوية ᴹᵉᵈᶜᵃˢᵉˢ🇵🇸 @MedCase7 · 33,032 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
👑 مملكة الطب | Kingdom of Medicine 💊 @Systemic7Medicine · 39,125 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
🇵🇸 ↓الطب النفسي Psychiatry @PsycGuide · 33,059 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 September 2026
🗣تطوير مهارة التحدث🄴🄽 @Listen_Closely · 33,465 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Medicine heroes || ابطال الطب @medicine_heroes · 35,316 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 2 September 2026
الجوكر 🔥 @PPCQO · 48,198 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 26 August 2026
المجلس الطبي الاعلى @Medical_Council · 62,799 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Ninja Nerd Videos & Notes 2026 @NinjaNerd770 · 38,660 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 31 August 2026
Medicine Way | MW @Medicine_Way2 · 127,391 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
الجراحة 💊| Surgery 🔪 - Crypto currency @no1_oone · 309,463 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Dr. Waleed Al-Sibakhi @Dr_Waleed_Al_Sibakhi · 50,809 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معلومات طبية M. Information” (@M_Information11), 8,817 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/M_Information11.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.