Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Mapping Pak Insurgency

Channel

Mapping Pak Insurgency

@MappingConflictinPakistan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,398subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003676048496
TypeChannel
Username@MappingConflictinPakistan
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MappingConflictinPakistan

Growth

1,3311,3981,364.57 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,344 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,342 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,338 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,332 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,331 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,345 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,380 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,398 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 37 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,321–1,408 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 14:171,398+18
9 Sept 2026, 15:411,380+35
4 Sept 2026, 09:171,345+14
31 Aug 2026, 15:051,331-1
25 Aug 2026, 16:181,332-6
13 Aug 2026, 13:491,338-4
10 Aug 2026, 22:511,342-2
8 Aug 2026, 05:541,344no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:021,344first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💔337.5%
💅225.0%
112.5%
👍112.5%
🤔112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC206 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️This notice is issued to inform members that posting privileges will be suspended for a period of several days due to specific reasons. We extend our apologies in advance for this inconvenience.

💔3🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC201 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

MORE ‼️🚨⚠️ According to reports, the number of deceased from the swat attack has risen to 17 which includes 7 Police personnel, 2 more police fatalities have been confirmed and their images have been attached while 12 people are getting treated in the hospital which includes 8 police personnel.

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC193 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

MORE 🚨‼️⚠️ CCTV footage of the Kabal police station attack yesterday.

💅2

3 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

MONITORING ⚠️🚨 Subject:- Occupied Balochistan | BLF Claims Series of Operations in Kharan and Tump The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), through spokesperson Major Gwahram Baloch, has claimed responsibility for a series of operations allegedly carried out in Kharan and Tump between July 30 and August 1. Claimed activities include: August 1 – Kharan City - The group claimed its fighters remained in control of

1

3 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC95 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALERT 🚨:- According to reports, unknown assailants opened fire on Maulana Irshad Aajir [in pic], a young leader of Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam (JUI) Bajaur,last night in Bajaur district of Occupied Khyber Pakhtunkhwa which resulted in his death Further details are awaited.

3 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC102 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

MORE ‼️⚠️🚨 Image of the suicide bomber who attacked the kabal police station yesterday.

3 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC103 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALERT 🚨:- According to reports, armed individuals reportedly overran the Numi Police Checkpost along the RCD Highway (Quetta–Karachi commercial route) in fc Lasbela district. Nine police personnel, including the checkpost in-charge, identified as Gulab, of the Pakistani Occupational forces were reportedly taken into custody. Items reportedly seized include: • 6 firearms • Military equipment • 5 motorcycles.

3 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC117 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALERT 🚨:- Hangu district , Occupied Khyber Pakhtunkhwa: 🔶 Armed masked individuals reportedly attacked a private United Bank Limited (UBL) branch in the Dallan area, within the jurisdiction of Thall Police Station. 🔶 According to initial reports, the assailants entered the branch, damaged CCTV cameras, computers, and other equipment, and reportedly fired at the bank's vault, causing damage inside the premises. 🔶 S

3 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC127 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALERT 🚨:- A convoy of mineral-carrying bowser trucks travelling along the Quetta–Taftan trade route reportedly came under attack in the Nok Chah area of Dalbadin, Chagai district of Occupied Balochistan. According to reports, the tyres of several vehicles were damaged, forcing the convoy to halt. No immediate information regarding casualties or responsibility was available and more details are awaited.

2 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC141 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

MORE 🚨⚠️‼️ Pakistani Occupational Forces Reported Operations in Bajaur and Khyber; 10 Suspected rebels Allegedly Killed. According to the stooge of the Pakistani forces , intelligence-based operations carried out under "Operation 11 GARAJ" in Bajaur and Khyber districts reportedly resulted in the deaths of 10 rebels. The operations were said to have been launched after intelligence and surveillance indicated the p

2 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ALERT 🚨:- Awaran district, Occupied Balochistan: 🔰 One person was killed and another injured in a reported firing incident in the Pirandar area of Awaran. 🔰 According to local sources, the deceased was identified as the son of contractor Ghaffar Rind, while the injured individual was identified as his brother, Abid Hussain. 🔰 Unconfirmed reports also indicate that Ghaffar Rind may have been injured in the incident

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @MappingConflictinPakistan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Mapping Pak Insurgency” (@MappingConflictinPakistan), 1,398 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MappingConflictinPakistan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.