Channel
@Marketing2022
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001904938275 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Marketing2022 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Marketing2022 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 13:11 | 36 | no change |
| 8 Oct 2026, 06:22 | 36 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (18 August 2026 – 8 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Oct 2026, 06:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 51.9% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 8 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«ЗАМОНАВИЙЛИК НИҚОБИ» Кўплаб воқеаларни биз оддий ҳаётий жараён ёки «замонавийлик» сифатида қабул қиламиз. Аммо уларнинг ортида баъзан маркетинг, бизнес манфаати ва катта пул айланмаси турган бўлиши мумкин. Буни тушуниш учун битта оддий мисол етарли. Бирор маҳсулот ёки хизмат аввал одамларга «янги тенденция», «замонавий ҳаёт тарзи», «қулайлик» сифатида тақдим этилади. Одамлар унга қизиқади. Қизиқиш талабни пайд…
Туркиялик технологик гигант компания асосчиси, Қораденгизлик Невзат Айдин компаниясини миллионлаб долларга сотганидан сўнг, тушган маблағдан 27 миллион долларини 114 нафар ходимига тенг равишда тақсимлаб берди. Ҳеч қандай қонуний мажбурияти бўлмаганига қарамай, у ходимларга иш стажи ва меҳнат натижасига қараб тўлов қилди ва: ««Муваффақиятга барчамиз биргаликда эришдик», — деди.» Ҳар бир ходимга ўртача 237 минг долл…
Қарзга ботганингизда душманни узоқдан қидирманг. Кўпинча бизга молиявий ёки маънавий зарар етказган инсонлар — ўзимиз ишонган, яқин деб билган одамларимиз бўлади. 🤍 Телеграм
👏1
Аҳолининг банклар олдидаги кредит қарзи 239,8 трлн сўмга етди 1-август ҳолатига Ўзбекистонда жисмоний шахсларнинг банклардан олган кредитлари қолдиғи 239,8 трлн сўмни ташкил этган. Бунинг қарийб 30 фоизи Тошкент шаҳри аҳолиси ҳиссасига тўғри келади. Ҳудудлар кесимида: Тошкент шаҳри — 70,9 трлн сўм Самарқанд — 17,8 трлн сўм Фарғона — 17,2 трлн сўм Андижон — 15,7 трлн сўм Қашқадарё — 15,6 трлн сўм Тошкент вилояти …
Нафсим билан курашаётган бандаман.. 🤍 Телеграм
👏3
Кемада бир тешик бўлса, ҳамма чўкади. 🛶 Масалан, маркетинг зўр, лекин маҳсулот ёмон бўлса — маркетинг ҳам чўкади. Ёки маркетинг зўр, лекин сотув бўлими яхши ишламаса — ҳамма чўкади… 🤍 Телеграм
БИЗНЕСИНГИЗНИ ҲАҚИҚАТДА ТАҲЛИЛ ҚИЛИБ КЎРГАНМИСИЗ? Сайт, Instagram, нархлар, мижозлар ёзишмалари ва рақобатчилар маълумотларини бир жойга жамланг. AI сизга: • Мижозингиз кимлигини • Энг катта оғриқ ва эътирозларни • Рақобатдаги бўш жойларни • Контентда нимани ўзгартириш кераклигини • Сотувда қаерда мижоз йўқолаётганини аниқлашга ёрдам беради. Энг муҳими — тахмин эмас, реал маълумотлар асосида. Бизнесда ўсишни хоҳ…
“савдо суст” деган ҳолатни фақат харидор пули йўқлиги билан тушунтириб бўлмайди. Асосий омиллар: • Рақобат кучайиши — таклиф кўпайган, мижоз танлови кенгайган. • Харидорнинг танлаб харид қилиши — эҳтиёж бор, лекин қарор қабул қилишда нарх ва қийматни кўпроқ солиштиради. • Айланма маблағ муаммоси — тадбиркор товар, реклама ва захирага етарли маблағ ажрата олмаслиги. • Сотув тизимининг эскириши — мижозни жалб қилиш, …
2026 йилда хусусий сектор раҳбари: Қарорда қатъий, фикрда замонавий, муомалада адолатли, рақамларда аниқ, жамоада талабчан, ўзгаришга очиқ ва натижага йўналган бўлиши керак. 🤍 Телеграм
Корхона ичидаги емирувчи омиллар: — Нотўғри бошқарув — Ходимлар ўртасида ишончсизлик — Назоратнинг сустлиги — Мижозлар билан нотўғри муносабат — Молиявий интизомсизлик — Масъулиятсизлик — Ривожланишга бефарқлик — Ички рақобат ва низолар 🤍 Телеграм
Таргет ишлаётган бўлса ҳам, мижоз келмаётганининг 3 та сабаби: 1 — Нотўғри аудитория танланган 2 — Креатив эътибор тортмаяпти 3 — Таклиф (оффер) кучсиз 🤍 Телеграм
Зaфар Ҳошимовдан шедевр: — Нисбийлик назариясини қандай изоҳлайсиз? — Ҳожатхона эшигининг икки томонидаги одамга вақт турлича ўтади. 🤍 Телеграм
🤣4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Marketing2022. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Marketing2022 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маркетинг|2022” (@Marketing2022), 36 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marketing2022.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.