mama lee anak anak nya ganteng bangett, alias mantep banget adek abang ituu ga sanggup😭😭
❤23
Signed caca

Channel
@Markleedailyupdateeee
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,707subscribers
-851 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001378684984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Markleedailyupdateeee |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 40 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Markleedailyupdateeee |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:50 | 21,707 | -25 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 18:17 | 21,732 | -22 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:27 | 21,754 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:35 | 21,767 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 21,774 | -28 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 21,802 | -26 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 21,828 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 21,842 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 21,847 | -29 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:56 | 21,876 | -16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 21,892 | -12 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:48 | 21,904 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 21,920 | -16 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:37 | 21,936 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 21,957 | -15 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 21,972 | -13 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:45 | 21,985 | -12 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:19 | 21,997 | +8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 21,989 | -15 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:36 | 22,004 | first reading |
149 posts held, back to 13 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (13 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 55,015 |
| Reactions total | 1,806 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6,791 reactions across 140 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,507 | 81.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 457 | 6.73% | |
| 😭 | 439 | 6.46% | |
| 💋 | 211 | 3.11% | |
| 🔥 | 124 | 1.83% | |
| 💘 | 26 | 0.383% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 0.133% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 0.103% | |
| ✍ | 5 | 0.074% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.059% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.029% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 141 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,791 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Markleedailyupdateeee. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 149 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (12.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
mama lee anak anak nya ganteng bangett, alias mantep banget adek abang ituu ga sanggup😭😭
❤23
Signed caca
BETEWEEE GIMANA MV NYA GIYAYAAAA?? AK SUKA BANGETT GANTENK BANGET PAK CIIO LAGUNYA JUGA MANTEP BETULL😭😭😭😭
❤22
Signed caca
MARK LEE DAILY UPDATE🐯💙 pinned «Mark Lee (마크리) - Happiest (Official Music Video) https://youtu.be/7aIOY0UZXTA?si=bB2v0KnPQPGrJuYA #MarkLee #마크리 #Happiest_MarkLee #WINDMILL_MarkLee #UpperRoom #어퍼룸»
esquire.korea's Instagram Reels Update With MARK🐯💙 #제작지원 뉴욕 윌리엄스버그 골목에서 마주한 마크리. 그리고 그가 노래하는 행복. 11월 9일 낮 12시, 에스콰이어 공식 유튜브 채널에서 공개됩니다. Stay tuned. Mark Lee on the streets of Williamsburg, New York. And the happiness he sings of. Premiering November 9 at 12 PM KST on Esquire Korea’s official YouTube channel. Stay tuned. - @maisonmargielafragrances #SCENTSORIUM #MarkLee #MaisonMargielaFragrance #MaisonMargiela - Edi…
❤7💋1
Signed caca
esquire.korea's Instagram Update With MARK🐯💙 #제작지원 𝑴𝒂𝒓𝒌’𝒔 𝑯𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒊𝒆𝒔 “계속 쫓아갈 수 있는 꿈이 있다는 것 자체로 행복하더라고요.” 메종 마르지엘라 프래그런스 센소리움이 낭만을 더한 마크의 가을, 뉴욕 이야기 🍂 더 많은 마크의 화보와 인터뷰는 다가오는 에스콰이어 코리아 12월호에서 만나보실 수 있습니다. Autumn in Williamsburg, touched by Maison Margiela’s new high-end fragrance, SCENTSORIUM. A glimpse into Mark’s little moments of happiness. Discover more in the upcoming December issue of Esquire Korea. - @maisonmargi…
❤7💋1
Signed caca
MARK's Instagram Story Update🐯💙
❤9❤🔥1💋1
Signed caca
’Happiest‘ OUT NOW 🎄 #MarkLee #마크리 #Happiest_MarkLee #UpperRoom #어퍼룸
❤9❤🔥1💋1
Signed caca
( ͡•. ͡•.) 갈맹이가 둘 ( ͡•. ͡•.) #MarkLee #마크리 #Happiest_MarkLee #UpperRoom #어퍼룸
❤14❤🔥1💋1
Signed caca
Mark Lee ‘Happiest’ Reaction with Kids #MarkLee #마크리 #Happiest_MarkLee #UpperRoom #어퍼룸
❤8💋1
Signed caca
Mark Lee Studio Album [WINDMILL] December 4 | 12AM EST | 2PM KST Album Pre-Order (Merch ver.) November 5 | 9PM EST | November 6 | 11AM KST ~ December 3 | 9:59AM EST | 11:59PM KST #MarkLee #마크리 #WINDMILL_MarkLee #UpperRoom #어퍼룸
❤5💋1
Signed caca
makasih banyakk ya guyss pengertian nyaa🥹 kalian juga, semangat terus dan jaga kesehatan yaaaa lopyuu!!🩵 ohh iya akhirnya Mark comeback, gimana perasaan kalian? dan kita akhirnya liat dia dance lagiiii🥹
❤24
Signed caca
MARK's Instagram Story Update🐯💙
❤🔥12❤4💋1
Signed caca
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @Markleedailyupdateeee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Markleedailyupdateeee named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MARK LEE DAILY UPDATE🐯💙” (@Markleedailyupdateeee), 21,707 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Markleedailyupdateeee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.