Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for marty official page

Channel

marty official page

@Marty_Amethyst_OP

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002524351043
TypeChannel
Username@Marty_Amethyst_OP
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Marty_Amethyst_OP

Growth

848584.510 August 2026 — 84 subscribers10 August 2026 — 84 subscribers10 September 2026 — 85 subscribers10 August 202610 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–85 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 23:3885+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:0084no change
10 Aug 2026, 11:4684first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 08s
Average length
2m 04s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

91 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5156.0%
😍1314.3%
🔥99.89%
🥰66.59%
💯44.40%
🍌33.30%
🍓33.30%
11.10%
👾11.10%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC45 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @idratherbecat

я уже скучаю честно сказать на фаере было оч вайбово как и во время всего проекта, к счастью это не последний мой проект так что дальше больше

4

9 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @melqwdPhoto

проект претти вумен окончательно закончился. безумно люблю этот проект и всех людей, которые были там. невероятно комфортные тренировки и общение, которое не ограничивалось только проектом. буду безумно скучать по претти вумен и вспоминать с улыбкой. люблю всей душой 。°(°¯᷄◠¯᷅°)°。 основа: — @idratherbecat | MINGYU — @goQoukkaJ | S.COUPS — @coquetteliana | LAY BANKZ подтанц: – @Marty_Amethyst_OP – @eshkereeee_777 –

4

25 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC134 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ttamsatamsPhoto

геленджик 2007 🍓

11🥰5🔥3

25 Jul 2026, 21:39 UTC129 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ttamsatamsPhoto

канонище 🤩

11💯4🔥3

17 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC167 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

самый большой проект блоссом (и самый быстрый одновременно)

😍7

15 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC159 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩 вот так прошла середина лета

11😍6🍌3🍓31👾1

15 Jul 2026, 19:24 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @stanculturetgPhoto

Сегодня середина лета.

5

11 Jul 2026, 17:31 UTC170 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ttamsatamsPhoto

крольшнепе

5🔥3🥰1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Marty_Amethyst_OP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“marty official page” (@Marty_Amethyst_OP), 85 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marty_Amethyst_OP.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.