3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Sept 2026, 15:56
73
+1
12 Sept 2026, 15:22
72
no change
12 Sept 2026, 14:47
72
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
107.0%
avg views ÷ 73 subscribers
Avg views / post
78.1
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held
14 (31 July 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total
1,015
Reactions total
168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Sept 2026, 15:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
168 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
130
77.4%
⚡
19
11.3%
❤🔥
10
5.95%
💯
7
4.17%
👏
2
1.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
أشعُر وكأنني قد مللتُ
من كل شيءٍ حولي.
مللتُ من الهاتف.
ومواقع التواصل.
والإنترنت بأسره.
وكل شيءٍ!
حتى البشر.
حتى الخروج من المنزل ملل.
وكذلك البقاء فيه ملل.
أيعقل أنني قد وصلتُ لمرحلةِ الزهد؟
حقًا، ولم أبلغ العشرين حتى.
ربما لا أدري، أو أنني لا أحب وقت الفراغ فحسب.
وهذه هي الحقيقةُ للأسف.
وليس كلامًا خياليًا.
بل واقعٌ أعيشه.
ـ مَارِية
ما دام الله قد أبعد عنك شيئًا بكيت شوقًا له ولم يأتِ، فأعلم أن ذلك خير، ولا تحزن؛ لعل الله قد كتب لك الأفضل وأبعد عنك ما هو أسوأ.
اصبر، وربّك أعلم بأمرك من خلقك، وهو أدرى بمصلحتك من نفسك ومن كل البشر من حولك.
استعن بالله ولا تيأس أبدًا، فكلنا بشر؛ مرةً نُصيب بفضل الله، ومرةً يكتب الله لنا الخير ويبعد الشر.
ـ مَارِية
تتسارعُ الأيَّام.
ونُدرك أننا لسنا مَن نُحدِّد مرورَ الزمن.
شهرٌ يتلو شهرًا.
بسرعة!
ولا ندري إلى متى؟
فبالأمس كنَّا في بدايةِ شهرٍ،
والآن في التاسعِ منه.
وقريبًا سوف ينقضي.
الأيام تجري.
وحقًّا،
سرعةُ الزمن ليست إيجابيَّةً؛
بل مخيفةٌ جدًّا.
ولا أنكرُ ذلك.
اللَّهمَّ أسألكَ البركةَ في الوقت.
ـ مَارِية.
يُجذبني الإنسان الذي يتميّز ويحب أن يُطوّر من نفسه رغم الفوضى وعدم الأهمية لتلك الأمور لدى البعض. يُعجبني من يهتمّ بذاته ويحاول الإصلاح منها، ولا يهمّه بقية البشر سواء نجحوا أم فشلوا بالطبع! لأن المهم هو وليس غيره، وهذا النوع نادرٌ حسب ظنّي، وهم المميّزون دائمًا.
- مَارِية
فَلْتَصمُت، ولا تُحدِّث أحدًا عن أحلامك و طموحاتك!
فمَن يَدَّعي القُرب منك، قد يكون من أكثر الناس الذين لا يتمنّون لك الخير، وقد لا يكون سوى شخصٍ مُتلوّن، يُجيد مجاملتك وإظهار الودّ ،فليس كلُّ مَن سمع أحلامك؛ تمنّى لك الوصول إليها، وليس كلُّ مَن صفّق لك؛ فرِح حقًّا بنجاحك.
نصيحةٌ من قلبِ مُحب:
احتفظ ببعض أحلامك لنفسك، و دَع إنجازاتك هي من تتحدث عنك.
صباحُ الخير.
ـ مَارِية
زحام وفوضى وعشوائية
تعريفٌ للسوشيال ميديا بإيجاز:
أحيانًا، عندما أدخل لتطبيق ما عبر الإنترنت، ربما أحتاج شيئًا ما، ولكن أجد الفوضى أمامي وأنسى لماذا فتحت التطبيق من الأساس، وعندها أتساءل: أليست تطبيقات من صُنع البشرية قد أوقعت بعقول المستخدمين؟
ربما هذا هو الغرض الذي صُنعت من أجله، ولكن للأسف نحن نجهل ذلك، أو ربما ندري ولكن نتغاضى عنه تحت شعار "علّنا نستفيد" صحيح، لا أنكر أنني أحب الجلوس وتصفح الهاتف، ولكنّي أدرك: ما…
في الرّابع من سبتمبر.
من عامِنَا هذا.
حِيثُ اليوم.
جَمِيل رغم ما فِيه.
من حَرارةِ الطقس.
و لكن!
يكفي أنّهُ الجمعة.
وزينتهُ الكهف.
و نوره الصّلاة على النّبي.
صلّوا عَلِيه وسلّموا تسليمًا.
ـ مَارِية.
السّلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.
هُنا، في مساحتي الضيّقة، أشارككم أوّل كتاباتي.
مرحبًا بمن تابعني وانضمّ إلى هذا الرُّكن الصغير ،لطالما أحببتُ مشاركة أشياء بسيطة عنّي، وعن أيّامي وما أتعلّمه في هذه الرحلة، وهنا سأعرّفكم بنفسي أكثر.
أنا مارِية رمضان.
تخرّجتُ من الثانوية هذا العام، ومُقبلة على الجامعة بإذن الله.
فتحتُ هذه القناة لنشر الفائدة، لا للّهو ولا للشهرة التي لا نفع فيها، وأسأل الله أن يجعلها مساحةً طيّبة، وأ…
❤14⚡2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Marya_7893. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مَارِية” (@Marya_7893), 73 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Marya_7893.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.