Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,213. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,378–10,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 07:40
9,579
-83
4 Nov 2026, 14:17
9,662
-49
1 Nov 2026, 07:17
9,711
-87
28 Oct 2026, 21:37
9,798
-64
25 Oct 2026, 23:11
9,862
-130
23 Oct 2026, 09:05
9,992
-33
22 Oct 2026, 07:21
10,025
-47
20 Oct 2026, 23:27
10,072
-20
19 Oct 2026, 23:57
10,092
-25
19 Oct 2026, 01:08
10,117
+1,154
15 Oct 2026, 16:39
8,963
+1,228
12 Oct 2026, 13:40
7,735
-43
5 Oct 2026, 14:18
7,778
-45
27 Sept 2026, 19:56
7,823
-94
18 Sept 2026, 04:57
7,917
-20
14 Sept 2026, 00:39
7,937
-42
10 Sept 2026, 00:41
7,979
-65
4 Sept 2026, 08:18
8,044
-32
1 Sept 2026, 02:28
8,076
-34
29 Aug 2026, 09:27
8,110
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 9,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.051%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
44 (29 June 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
46,626
Reactions total
23
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 22:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
23
Links
9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
72 reactions across 26 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
68
94.4%
🙏
3
4.17%
👏
1
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (38.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📢 اطلاعیه مهم | Mazda VPN
💚 همراهان و کاربران عزیز مزدا ویپیان؛
متأسفانه بهدلیل بدقولیهای مکرر رباتساز و عدم پایبندی به تعهدات، در کنار هزینههای بسیار سنگین توسعه و نگهداری زیرساخت، در حال حاضر امکان ادامه ارائه خدمات برای ما فراهم نیست.
🎯 رضایت شما و کیفیت سرویسها همیشه اولویت اصلی تیم مزدا ویپیان بوده است. به همین دلیل ترجیح میدهیم بهجای ارائه خدماتی با کیفیت پایینتر از استاندارد موردنظرمان، فعالیت خو…
دیگه نگران جنگ و قطعی نت نباشید.
🚀 ربات Mazda VPN با سرویس VIP فعال شد ✅
@MazdaVpnBot
سرویس اقتصادی Vip امکان اتصال در زمان جنگ و اختلال اینترنت 🔥
⚡هر گیگ فقط ۱۰ هزار تومان 👇
🤖@MazdaVpnBot
🎉تعداد روز و کاربر نامحدود رایگان
🚀💎 با توجه به ارتقای قدرت سرورها و بهبود عملکرد آنها، قیمت سرویسهای Mazda VPN از این پس کمی افزایش پیدا کرده است.
⚡️ قیمت هر گیگابایت: ۱۰,۰۰۰ تومان
هدف ما ارائه اتصالی باکیفیتتر و سرعتی بالاتر است تا با آسودگی خاطر از سرویسهامون استفاده کنید. 💚
🙏 ممنون از همراهی و اعتماد همیشگی شما به Mazda VPN 🔥
🤖 خرید و دریافت سرویس از ربات 👇
➡️ @MazdaVpnBot
🚀🔥 یه خبر فوقالعاده برای کاربران Mazda VPN!
💎 تمام سرورهای ما با موفقیت بهروزرسانی شدند و حالا با سرعتی بالاتر، عملکردی قدرتمندتر و کیفیت اتصالی بهتر از همیشه آماده استفاده هستن! ⚡️
🔥 تمام تلاشمون رو کردیم تا تجربه اتصال شما رو به سطح بالاتری ببریم؛ حتی در شرایط ضعف یا اختلال اینترنت، عملکرد سرورها بهبود پیدا کنه.
💚 اگه از قبل سروری دارید، همین حالا بهروزرسانیاش کنید و تفاوت عملکرد نسخه جدید رو تجربه کنید!
🤖…
دوستان کمی صبوری کنید لطفا داریم روی سرورامون کار میکنیم . درسته سرعتش خوب بود راضی بودید ولی میخوایم یکاریش کنیم حتی اگر اینترنت ضعیف یا قطع بشه همیشه براتون متصل بمونه.❤️🔥
پس کمی صبوری کنید یکی دو روز تا سرورارو بروز کنیم از سرعتش لذت ببرید❤️🔥
🌐 اینترنت آزاد، بدون دردسر! 🚀🔥
هنوز برای وصل شدن به بعضی سایتها و اپلیکیشنها مشکل داری؟ 👀
🛡 مزدا VPN برای یه اتصال راحتتر و بیدردسرتر!
⚡ پرسرعت و بدون محدودیت کاربر
💰 هر گیگ فقط ۵ هزار تومن!
🤖 خرید و دریافت سرویس از ربات 👇
➡️ @MazdaVpnBot
🎬 فیلم و سریال رو سریعتر دانلود کن! 🚀
🛡 فیلترشکن پرسرعت، بدون محدودیت کاربر ⚡
💰 فقط گیگی ۵ هزار تومن!
🎁 دریافت ۱۰۰۰ روز رایگان از ربات!🔥
🤖 خرید و دریافت سرویس 👇
➡️@MazdaVpnBot
🛡️ فیلترشکن پرسرعت و بدون محدودیت کاربر، وصل در تمام شرایط⚡
💰 فقط گیگی ۵ هزار تومان!
🎁 حتی میتونی از ربات، ۱۰۰۰ روز رایگان بگیری و نگهش داری؛ تموم نمیشه!
🛜جهت خرید سرویس از ربات:👇
🤖@MazdaVpnBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @MazdaVpn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @MazdaVpn as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مزدا وی پی ان Mazda Vpn” (@MazdaVpn), 9,579 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MazdaVpn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.