اینم آموزش کار با این ابزار خدمتتوون 🔥 پژوهش هوشمندانه یعنی استفاده از ابزار درست، بدون فراموشکردن دقت علمی! 🧠 تیم پژوهشی مدویژن 🚀 🌐 کانالمون: | @medvision_research |

Channel
MedVision | مِدویژن
@Medvision_research
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,983subscribers
+4,293 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002351323011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Medvision_research |
| Description | مدویژن | MedVision Research 🚀 مقالهنویسی از صفــر تا مسیر چاپ ✨ اوریجینال + مروری 🧠 رزومهسازی علمی حرفهای | @medvision_admin | :ارتباط با ادمین 📩 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Medvision_research |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:10 | 5,983 | -220 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:39 | 6,203 | -185 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:28 | 6,388 | -98 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 6,486 | -26 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 07:50 | 6,512 | -1,020 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 7,532 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 7,544 | -19 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 7,563 | -26 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 7,589 | -70 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 7,659 | -340 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 7,999 | +6,511 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 1,488 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 1,491 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 1,496 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 1,502 | -35 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 1,537 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 1,542 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,554 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,565 | -64 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 1,629 | first reading |
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.0%
- avg views ÷ 5,983 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,400
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (30 October 2025 – 12 October 2026) |
| Views total | 9,580 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 112
- Videos
- 16
- Links
- 37
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 11m 55s
- Average length
- 11m 55s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔍 حرفهایها چطور توی یک هفته، ۱۰۰۰ مقاله رو اسکرین میکنن؟ اگه درگیر یه Systematic Review باشی، میدونی که اسکرین صدها مقاله و اکسترکت دادهها چقدر وقتگیره 🧠 یکی از این ابزارها AnswerThis هست؛ اما دقیقاً چه کارهایی ازش برمیاد؟ بریم ببینیم! 🚀 🔹 طراحی تاپیک: تعریف تاپیک دقیق و مشخصکردن معیارهای ورود و خروج با چارچوبهایی مثل PICO 🔹 سرچ استراتژی: شناسایی کلمات کلیدی و مترادفها و ساخت Search String 🔹 سرچ مقالات:…
اینم مقاله کاملش خدمتتوووون ❤️
🦠 این چند روز هرجا رو باز میکنی یه نفر داره از «طاعون روسیه» حرف میزنه ما هم رفتیم سراغ یکی از بهترین مقالات درباره طاعون ریوی و به چند نکته جالب رسیدیم: اول اینکه برخلاف چیزی که تصور میکنیم، انتقال طاعون اصلاً منظم و قابل پیشبینی نیست گاهی چند مورد بیمار ایجاد میشه و همهچیز تموم میشه گاهی هم یک نفر یا یک مراسم خاکسپاری، جرقه یک خوشه بزرگ انتقال رو میزنه چیزی شبیه همون Super-spreading که زمان کرونا زیاد شن…
🧠 اگه میشد فقط با تابوندن یه نور، بخشی از مغز رو روشن یا خاموش کرد چی؟ چیزی که تا چند سال پیش بیشتر شبیه فیلمهای علمیتخیلی بود، حالا یکی از مهمترین ابزارهای علوم اعصابه؛ ابزاری به اسم «اپتوژنتیک» 🏆 نوبل فیزیولوژی یا پزشکی ۲۰۲۶ به کارل دیسروث، پیتر هگمان و گئورگ ناگل رسید 💡 اپتوژنتیک به محققها اجازه میده نورونهای خاصی رو به نور حساس کنن و بعد با یک پالس نوری، فعالیت اونها رو کنترل کنن یعنی میتونیم ببینیم د…
هنوز مقاله رو نمیتونی دانلود کنی؟ قفل مقالهها رو بشکن پشت هر مقالهای یه در مخفی هست — اینجا نقشهشو میگم! 🗺️ تا حالا شده یه مقاله چشمتو بگیره، دقیقاً همونی باشه که لازم داری، کلیک کنی… و بعد 💥 بخوری به یه دیوار $۴۲۵۰ دلاری؟ “واقعاً بابت یه فایل PDF؟!” اینجا دقیقاً جاییه که ریسرچرای حرفه ای سراغ یه سری ابزار میرن – همهشون کاربردیان! 👇 🔓 ۱. Sci-Hub شاهکلید قدیمی. فقط DOI رو بنداز توش و اکثر مواقع مقاله رو…
⚖️ 🟢 ابزارهای اولویت دوم ✅ ۵. Unpaywall (افزونه مرورگر) وقتی مقالهای بهصورت قانونی Open Access منتشر شده، این افزونه یه قفل سبز کنارش میاره و مستقیم دانلودش میکنی. خیلی باحاله! 📩 ۶. Open Access Button اگه مقاله رایگان نبود، خودش از نویسنده درخواست میفرسته که فایل رو برات بفرسته. البته… بیشتر نویسندهها جواب نمیدن 😅 ولی شاید شانست زد! 🧠 ۷. DOAJ – Directory of Open Access Journals اگه داری مقاله مینویسی، اینجا…
عزیزای من ❤️ فرصت ویژه منتورینگ تخصصی آموزش مقالهنویسی از صفر! با احترام ب درخواست اعضا ، تعداد محدودی ظرفیت باز شده در فیلدهای زیر کنسر (1 نفر) | نورولوژی (2 نفر) | افتالمولوژی (2 نفر) | جراحی (1 نفر) | هوش مصنوعی (1 نفر) عضو میپذیریم 🧠🧬 🏅 منتورشیپ تخصصی با H-index بالا ✨ همراه با سرتیفیکیت معتبر بینالمللی 📩 ادمینمون : | @medvision_admin |
گزارش سابمیت مقالهای دیگر از ریسرچرای مدویژن در حوزه Breast Cancer ✨ 📊 IF: 7.3 🏅 Q1 📚 Springer Nature 📰 Breast Cancer Research (BMC) ✨ گامی دیگر در مسیر انتشار پژوهشهای باکیفیت در ژورنالی معتبر و تخصصی | تیم پژوهشی مدویژن 🚀 | 🌐 کانالمون: | @medvision_research | 📩 ادمینمون: | @medvision_admin |
بعد استقبال بینظیرتوون برای هماهنگی قبل شروع گروه ها ی جلسه داشتیمممم با منتورامون فقط بگم چ پلنایییی 🔥 برای دوره چیدیم 👀 راستش هرچی بیشتر جلو میریم، بیشتر برای دیدن پیشرفت و موفقیت تکتک بچههای دوره هیجانزده میشیم ❤️ بهزودی از مسیر و موفقیت شرکت کننده های دوره بیشتر براتون میذاریم✨ اگر سوال پرسیدین از ادمینمون امروز خودم داخل اکانت ادمین هستم ویس میفرستم براتوون و راهنماییتون میکنم ❤
💬 پاسخ به سوالات شما درباره دوره آموزش مقالهنویسی مدویژن🚀 ✨ آیا این دوره برای افراد مبتدی هم مناسبه؟ 📝 بله. دوره از پایه طراحی شده و نیازی به تجربه قبلی در مقالهنویسی نداری ✨ اگر قبلاً چند دوره یا آموزش مقالهنویسی دیده باشم، باز هم این دوره به دردم میخوره؟ 🚀 بله. تمرکز این منتورینگ فقط روی آموزش نیست؛ روی Taskها، فیدبکها و بهکارگیری آموختهها در مسیر پژوهش هم کار میکنیم ✨ جلسات آنلاین هستند؟ 💻 بله. جلسات به…
جزئیات کامل مسیر آموزشی و کوریکولوم دورمون خدمتتووووون ✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @Medvision_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
📊 نظرسنجی مدویژن | شما دوست دارید دوره بعدی ما چی باشه؟ ما در حال برنامهریزی برای دورههای جدید آموزشی هستیم و نظر شما برامون خیلی مهمه 💬
- 1️⃣ دوره کدنویسی پیشرفته در پزشکی (Medical Coding & AI)16%
- 2️⃣ نگارش Narrative review از صفر تا چاپ9%
- 3️⃣ متاآنالیز پیشرفته با نرمافزارهای R و RevMan19%
- 4️⃣ نگارش Systematic review از صفر تا چاپ28%
- 5️⃣ بیوانفورماتیک مقدماتی برای دانشجویان پزشکی9%
- 6️⃣ نگارش Abstract حرفهای و آمادهسازی برای ارسال به کنگره19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MedVision | مِدویژن” (@Medvision_research), 5,983 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Medvision_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.