Channel
@Merkezalfahm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,137subscribers
+1,013 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001086978463 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Merkezalfahm |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Merkezalfahm |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 5,137 | +1,031 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:00 | 4,106 | -11 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 4,117 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:38 | 4,118 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 4,123 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 4,121 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 4,124 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 4,131 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 4,133 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 4,132 | +7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 4,125 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 4,124 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 4,124 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
💡فَائِدَةٌ💡 أَحْرُفُ الْجَوَابِ الْمُثْبَتَةِ : Les lettres qui vous permettent de répondre par l’affirmatif (oui) : ١ - نَعَمْ ٢ - أَجَلْ ٣ - جَلَلْ ٤ - جَيْرِ ٥ - بَجَلْ مِثَالٌ : هَلِ التَّوْحِيدُ أَهَمُّ مَا يَدْرُسُهُ الْاِنْسَانُ؟ الْجَوَابُ : نَعَمْ/أَجَلْ/جَلَلْ/جَيْرِ/بَجَلْ، كُلُّهَا بِمَعْنى وَاحِدٍ. Exemple : Est-ce que l’unicité (d’Allah) est la chose la plus importante à étudier pour l’homme? (Tou…
💡فَائِدَةٌ💡 إِمَّعَةٌ : أَصْلُ هَذِهِ الْكَلِمَةِ : إِنِّي مَعَكَ L’origine de ce mot : « Certes, je suis avec toi ! » تُطْلَقُ هَذِه الْكَلِمَةُ عَلَى مَنْ لَا رَأْيَ لَهُ، وَلَا عَزْمَ، وَيَتَّبِعُ كُلَّ ذِي رَأْيٍ دُونَ أَنْ يَثْبُتَ عَلَى رَأْيٍ Ce mot désigne celui qui n’a ni opinion propre, ni détermination, et qui suit l’avis de quiconque en a un, sans jamais s’arrêter fermement sur une position. قَالَ ابْ…
🚨 سلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Des publicités peuvent apparaître sous certaines de nos publications pour ceux n’ayant pas de comptes Telegram premium. Nous tenons à préciser que nous n’avons aucun lien avec leur contenu et que nous n’en sommes pas responsables. Qu’Allah vous préserve.
الْجَوَابُ الصَّحِيحُ : تَنَافُرُ الْكَلِمَاتِ الْمُجْتَمِعَة : أَنْ يَكُونَ بَيْنَ الْكَلِمَاتِ تَنَافَرٌ، فَتَثْقُلُ عَلَى السَّمْعِ، وتَعْسُرُ عَلَى النُّطْق. La bonne réponse : La discordance des mots une fois assemblés : le sens de cela consiste à ce qu’il y est une discordance dans l’assemblage de ces mots, les uns avec les autres, ce qui rend la parole lourde à l’entente et difficile à prononcer. وَقَبْرُ …
Posted without readable text
سُؤَالٌ بَلَاغِيٌّ : Question rhétorique : وَقَبْرُ حَرْبٍ بِمَكَانٍ قَفْرٍ *** وَلَيْسَ قُرْبَ قَبْرِ حَرْبٍ قَبْرُ مَا عَيْبُ هَذَا الْكَلامِ؟ Quel est le défaut de cette parole? ⬇️ 💡 Essaye de répéter ce vers, trois fois d’affilée rapidement, tu remarqueras peut-être où se trouve le défaut. _________________________ https://t.me/Merkezalfahm ———————————— Partage conseillé ✅ Modification interdite ⛔️
الْجَوَاب: La réponse : 1️⃣ جمع كثرة sans جمع قلة قَلْب (cœur) → قُلُوب (cœurs) — وزن فُعُول، جمع كثرة Pas de جمع قلة pour قلب. 2️⃣ جمع قلة sans جمع كثرة فُؤَاد (cœur) → أَفْئِدَة (cœurs) — وزن أَفْعِلَة، جمع قلة Les Arabes n’ont pas employé de جمع كثرة pour فؤاد. 3️⃣ Les deux à la fois جَمَل (chameau) → أَجْمَال (quelques chameaux, جمع قلة، وزن أَفْعَال) / جِمَال (beaucoup de chameaux, جمع كثرة، وزن فِعَال) (Autr…
سُؤَال : Question : Parmi les formes de pluriel brisé (جَمع تكسير), certaines sont réservées à la “quantité restreinte” (جمع قلة, de 3 à 10), d’autres à la “grande quantité” (جمع كثرة, 11 et plus), et d’autres encore relèvent de la “forme extrême des pluriels” (صيغة منتهى الجموع), qui ne distingue pas entre petite et grande quantité. 🔹 Trouvez un exemple pour chacun des cas suivants : 1️⃣ Un mot qui possède un جمع…
Photo, posted without a caption
💡فَائِدَةٌ💡 Traduction : J’ai vu les gens se tourner vers celui qui possède de l’argent (des biens). Quant à celui qui n’en possède pas, les gens se détournent de lui. J’ai vu les gens aller vers celui qui possède de l’or. Quant à celui qui ne possède pas d’or, les gens s’en vont loin de lui. J’ai vu les gens se rassembler autour de celui qui possède de l’argent (le métal argent). Quant à celui qui ne possède pas…
💡فَائِدَةٌ💡 مِنْ لَطَائِفِ اللُّغَةِ العَرَبِيَّةِ أَنَّ العَرَبَ سَمَّوْا البَيْعَ صَفْقَةً؛ لِأَنَّ البَائِعَ كَانَ إِذَا تَمَّ البَيْعُ صَفَقَ بِيَدِهِ عَلَى يَدِ المُشْتَرِي عَلَامَةً عَلَى إِبْرَامِ العَقْدِ وَتَأْكِيدِهِ، فَغَلَبَ اسْمُ هَذَا الفِعْلِ عَلَى نَفْسِ المُعَامَلَةِ، فَقِيلَ: أَبْرَمَ صَفْقَةً وَعَقَدَ صَفْقَةً. وَمِنْ هُنَا جَاءَتْ كَلِمَةُ الصَّفْقَةِ بِمَعْنَى البَيْعِ أَوِ الِاتِّفَاقِ، بَعْدَ…
الْجَوَابُ : La réponse : تَفَطَّنَ الْقَائِدُ إِلَى مَا فِي هَذِهِ الرِّسَالَةِ، لِأَنَّهُ كَانَ فِي هَذَا الزَّمَنِ إذَا كَتَبَ أَحَدٌ إلَى الْأَمِيرِ أَوْ الْقَائِدِ لَم يَبْتَدِئْ بِ"يَا عَزِيزِي" بَلْ بِ"يَا أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ " أَوْ مَا أَشْبَهَ ذَلِكَ، فَشَعَرَ الْقَائِدُ بِأَنَّ هُنَاكَ شَيْئًا خَفِيًّا فِي الْكِتَابَةِ، ثُمَّ فِي قَوْلِ الرَّجُلِ "أَكْتُبُ إِلَيْكَ مِنْ الْقَلْبِ" أَيْ اِقْرَأ هَذِهِ ال…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Merkezalfahm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Institut Merkez Al Fahm (la compréhension) مركز الفهم” (@Merkezalfahm), 5,137 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Merkezalfahm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.