Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 39 days, net -108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,222–5,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 04:56
5,238
-6
11 Sept 2026, 12:41
5,244
-8
6 Sept 2026, 18:19
5,252
-9
2 Sept 2026, 04:15
5,261
-8
30 Aug 2026, 06:44
5,269
-7
27 Aug 2026, 01:35
5,276
-9
23 Aug 2026, 19:07
5,285
-14
20 Aug 2026, 00:22
5,299
-9
16 Aug 2026, 21:45
5,308
-17
13 Aug 2026, 03:26
5,325
-9
10 Aug 2026, 05:11
5,334
-10
7 Aug 2026, 13:32
5,344
-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:00
5,346
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:56
5,346
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 7 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 11s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,026 reactions across 22 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
379
36.9%
👏
169
16.5%
❤
157
15.3%
🔥
103
10.0%
😁
93
9.06%
🙏
30
2.92%
🤔
23
2.24%
🤬
16
1.56%
💩
11
1.07%
🤡
11
1.07%
⚡
6
0.585%
👎
5
0.487%
😨
5
0.487%
😱
4
0.39%
🤯
3
0.292%
🥱
3
0.292%
🏆
2
0.195%
💯
2
0.195%
😢
2
0.195%
❤🔥
1
0.097%
1 further kind
1
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,026 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2025 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️ Weidel: la "Trump alemana" que tiene a Berlín y a Bruselas temblando
🔴 En Alemania hay un partido al que el propio Estado, sus servicios de inteligencia, quieren declarar ilegal. Un partido que buena parte de la prensa llama impresentable, vigilado, peligroso. Y ese mismo partido, hoy, es el más votado del país. Por delante del que gobierna.
🔴 Guardate esa contradicción, porque es la punta de todo. Se llama AfD.…
🔥 ¿El comunismo secuestró al Partido Demócrata?
🚨 Escuchá esto tal cual se dijo, hace apenas unos días: "Nos están usando... o están tratando de usarnos... como un vehículo." Pará un segundo, porque la frase cambia completamente cuando te cuento quién la dijo. No es un republicano acusando al otro bando. Es un CONGRESISTA DEMÓCRATA, de Texas, hablando de su propio partido. Se llama Henry Cuéllar, y agregó algo todav…
🔷 La ola azul que le repinta el mapa a Hispanoamérica
🚨 Durante 20 años, el mapa de Hispanoamérica se fue pintando de rojo... país por país. Y en apenas unas semanas, ese mapa empezó a repintarse de azul.
🚨 En Lima, la izquierda ya perdió la elección. En Colombia está entregando el poder. Y no hablo de una encuesta ni de una promesa de campaña: hablo de dos presidentes jurando el cargo.
🚨 Pero quedate con esta i…
Miguel Díaz pinned «🔴 Estimados amigos, he retomado mi canal de YT, rebautizado como "Tablero Global MD". Les dejo aquí el enlace y la invitación para analizar juntos un tema de geopolítica: ➡️ Acá les dejo algunos videos: ✅ ¿Nace un eje Ucrania–Israel? La jugada de Trump que…»
🔴 Estimados amigos, he retomado mi canal de YT, rebautizado como "Tablero Global MD". Les dejo aquí el enlace y la invitación para analizar juntos un tema de geopolítica:
➡️ Acá les dejo algunos videos:
✅ ¿Nace un eje Ucrania–Israel? La jugada de Trump que reordena el tablero
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4WQhwon10xQ&t=234s
✅ El mapa real de las midterms: quién gana el Senado, la Cámara y por qué le importa a Tr…
#Inmigración | El coste real de las pateras y MENA: Vox logra romper el silencio fiscal sobre la inmigración ilegal
✍️ https://shorturl.at/8Jcut
La formación de Santiago Abascal logró que se aprobara una solicitud para que el Tribunal de Cuentas elabore un informe sobre los gastos públicos derivados de la inmigración ilegal.
Por @MiguelDiazOK1
Sosoecho que las explosivas declaraciones de ayer de Santiago Abascal exigiendo "hundir el barco de negreros de Open Arms" estuvieron coordinadas con esta "sombrero blanco" del ejército español.
Atención.
https://gaceta.es/espana/una-comandante-del-ejercito-llama-a-sentar-a-open-arms-frente-a-la-corte-internacional-contacta-con-las-mafias-para-traer-inmigrantes-a-la-peninsula-20250829-1048/
El comisario Villarejo (que es un Sombrero Blanco, conectado con los servicios de inteligencia norteamericanos y que conoció en la cárcel al ex jefe de los servicios de inteligencia venezolanos Hugo El Pollo Carvajal) afirma que el ejército USA va a detener a Nicolás Maduro y después de él, al ex presidente español José Luís Rodríguez Zapatero (aunque no lo dice expresamente, por su participación en el cartel militar…
El Gobierno de Pedro Sánchez les expropió las tierras a agricultores de Valencia bajo el pretexto de que son de "dominio público". Ni siquiera los dejan entrar para recolectar las cosechas.
Mao Zedong debe estar celebrando (desde el infierno, por supuesto).
"Las leyes verdes son las culpables del desastre de la DANA y de los incendios"
Se puede decir más fuerte, pero no más claro.
👍18🔥6
Signed Miguel Diaz
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @MiguelDiazOK1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2025 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
5
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
5
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MiguelDiazOK1 named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mdzol named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@migueldiazokas named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@epochtimesesp named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@lucas named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@mdzradio named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Canal de Agustín Laje @lajeagustin · 27,318 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 September 2026
TierraPura.org | Información sin censura @tierrapura · 29,306 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Miguel Díaz” (@MiguelDiazOK1), 5,238 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiguelDiazOK1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.