Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Михаил Кириченко - БДД

Channel

Михаил Кириченко - БДД

@Mikhail_BDD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,848subscribers

-55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001969492217
TypeChannel
Username@Mikhail_BDD
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mikhail_BDD

Growth

14,84814,91014,8796 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,905 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,910 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,909 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,903 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,895 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,894 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,890 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,880 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,873 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,868 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,861 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,862 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,863 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,865 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,860 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,858 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,863 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,861 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,853 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,851 subscribers4 September 2026 — 14,848 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 28 days, net -55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,839–14,919 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 03:3714,848-3
2 Sept 2026, 15:3614,851-2
1 Sept 2026, 15:2614,853-8
31 Aug 2026, 14:5814,861-2
30 Aug 2026, 12:0414,863+5
29 Aug 2026, 15:2714,858-2
28 Aug 2026, 16:4314,860-5
27 Aug 2026, 15:3714,865+2
25 Aug 2026, 16:0914,863+1
24 Aug 2026, 12:5414,862+1
22 Aug 2026, 20:0814,861-7
21 Aug 2026, 09:5714,868-5
20 Aug 2026, 11:1314,873-7
19 Aug 2026, 09:5614,880-10
18 Aug 2026, 10:3314,890-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:0614,894-1
16 Aug 2026, 03:5414,895-7
14 Aug 2026, 15:3514,902-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:5614,903-6
12 Aug 2026, 10:0514,909first reading

Engagement

57 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.7%
avg views ÷ 14,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,920
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.655%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 57 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held57 (26 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total107,953
Reactions total690
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 36s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,159 reactions across 54 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44238.1%
😁27623.8%
🔥21618.6%
847.25%
👎383.28%
🤡231.98%
🤣201.73%
😭100.863%
🤔90.777%
🥱90.777%
🥴50.431%
🎉40.345%
💯40.345%
😢40.345%
😨40.345%
❤‍🔥20.173%
💊20.173%
🥰20.173%
👏10.086%
😎10.086%
3 further kinds30.259%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.75%
1 of 57 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,050
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,230
over 54 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzquk9akK117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:33 UTC673 views12 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

я календарь переверну... И Михаил станет звездой клипа🤭

🔥9👍2😁1

3 Sept 2026, 04:18 UTC≈1,130 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Без окон, без дверей - полна горница людей. А вентилировать как?🤔 Нам задают вопрос⬇️ День добрый. Спасибо за ответы, помогаете сформировать мысли. Ещё есть вопрос у меня. В рамках моей пристройки в 30 кв.м. есть 3 маленькие комнаты, из которых одна - глухая, без окон а вторая - санузел. Раскидывать на такую маленькую площадь полноценный климат-контроль бессмысленно, но вентиляция каркаснику необходима. Сегодня обс

👍121

2 Sept 2026, 12:01 UTC≈1,550 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🤡81👍1

1 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,650 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Небольшое дополнение к посту по заявкам читателей. Для тех, кто уже построился и проживает в своем доме, и находится в зонах высокой вероятности терминальных осадков⬇️ ▪️Окна Даже простая тонировочная пленка сильно снижает травматичность и опасность осколков. ▪️Деревянные конструкции Имеет смысл обработать составами с антиперенами, заодно и сруб проживет сильно дольше. ▪️Территория Территорию вокруг дома, желател

👍14🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,490 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Когда мы рассматриваем защиту дома и близких, мы должны понять от чего, собственно, защищаться? И какие типы повреждений чаще всего возникают: ▪️1. Боеприпасы на БПЛА чаще всего осколочно-фугасные и зажигательные. И вот от них происходит большинство косвенных разрушений. При сбитии дронов они детонируют при падении. Есть ещё термобарические и кумулятивные, плюс - сложные комбинации. Но это, как ты понимаешь,

👍296🤬1

1 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈1,440 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Дроностойкий дом. Что тебя защитит? Здравствуй, дорогой друг! Давай немного о наболевшем. Вопрос о падении разного нехорошего на строения жилые и нежилые, сейчас волнуют многих. Уже не один и не два, а многие десятки наших дорогих заказчиков интересуются устойчивостью их домовладений к попаданиям дронов. Что же, надо немного раскрыть базу по поводу разных технологий, и как они сохраняют твою недвижимость и здоровье

4

1 Sept 2026, 08:03 UTCviews —

Михаил Кириченко - БДД pinned «🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ➖ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Здравствуй, дорогой друг! Я собрал дайджест того, что у нас вышло в августе. Если вдруг ты что-то пропустил, то залетай по ссылкам и будь в теме👇 ВЫПУСКИ: 🔸Выставка Open Village 2026: Тренды и косяки 🔸Одноэтажный дом 130 м². Обзор проекта.…»

1 Sept 2026, 08:02 UTC≈1,710 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 ➖ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Здравствуй, дорогой друг! Я собрал дайджест того, что у нас вышло в августе. Если вдруг ты что-то пропустил, то залетай по ссылкам и будь в теме👇 ВЫПУСКИ: 🔸Выставка Open Village 2026: Тренды и косяки 🔸Одноэтажный дом 130 м². Обзор проекта. Обзор планировок и архитектуры 🔸Осторожно, ГОРЕ-проектировщик! Разбор смертельных ошибок 🔸ТОП ЛУЧШИХ ГРИЛЕЙ. Какой гриль купить для своего участка? 🔸Ошибки или

👍6

1 Sept 2026, 04:05 UTC≈1,900 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Нахуй дерево! Берем ЛСТК? Нам прилетел обширный вопрос про монолит и газик, но мы зацепились за кое-что более интересное👇 ...И момент, который меня там наиболее смущает: он предлагает делать всю стропилку из ЛСТК вместо дерева, без мауэрлата, через закладные в монолитной стене. Но как это повлияет на сами стены и т.д Сходу можно сказать, что у ЛСТК ряд преимуществ🔥 но куда же без нюансов? Рассмотрим это в двух сцен

👍181👎1💊1🔥1🤡1

29 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC≈2,790 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Автоклавные ячеистые блоки Или всеми любимый газобетон?🤔 Легкий, тепленький, быстрая возводимость... НО! Конечно же есть нюансы... Поэтому сегодня рассказываем об особенности возведения стен из газобетона. Что учитывать при приемке материала? На что смотреть при контроле стройки? А также история о газобетоне и спизженном сейфе😡 Лекция ждет тебя на Бусти

👍61

28 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC≈2,970 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥175😨4🤔3🙈1

Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @Mikhail_BDD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll369 voters

Когда остекление выходит на угол👇

  1. огонь идея, сделал бы себе такое20%
  2. смотрится классно, но делать не стал бы56%
  3. и делать не буду, и смотрится плохо24%
  4. сейчас свое ценное мнение в комменты напишу2%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

FORUMHOUSE
@forumhouseru · 51,543
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Домашний мастер
@dom_mas · 50,209
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 August 2026
Архитектор Борис Зайцев
@zaboris · 64,976
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ
@zems · 48,941
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Михаил Кириченко - БДД” (@Mikhail_BDD), 14,848 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mikhail_BDD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.