Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +43,930. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,607–126,716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 13:39
120,126
+1,449
15 Sept 2026, 12:17
118,677
+1,708
14 Sept 2026, 00:01
116,969
+3,722
12 Sept 2026, 03:59
113,247
+6,087
9 Sept 2026, 23:36
107,160
+1,148
6 Sept 2026, 19:14
106,012
+1,587
4 Sept 2026, 05:59
104,425
+4
2 Sept 2026, 19:47
104,421
-77
1 Sept 2026, 18:45
104,498
-22
31 Aug 2026, 18:13
104,520
+286
30 Aug 2026, 18:58
104,234
+470
29 Aug 2026, 18:38
103,764
-136
28 Aug 2026, 18:28
103,900
-120
27 Aug 2026, 17:13
104,020
+70
26 Aug 2026, 14:26
103,950
+159
25 Aug 2026, 13:06
103,791
-519
24 Aug 2026, 11:56
104,310
-1,648
22 Aug 2026, 17:39
105,958
-566
21 Aug 2026, 11:39
106,524
-458
20 Aug 2026, 14:53
106,982
first reading
Engagement
341 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 120,126 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,700
123 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
123
of 341 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
341 (2 August 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
3,775,600
Reactions total
50,653
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,410
Videos
≈141
Links
≈768
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 52s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
85,587 reactions across 341 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
37,545
43.9%
custom 5240490920146641079
10,383
12.1%
custom 5240181596601984318
7,276
8.50%
custom 5240398707198796053
6,228
7.28%
custom 5242573571263307749
4,423
5.17%
👎
3,851
4.50%
🤡
3,600
4.21%
👍
3,286
3.84%
💩
3,133
3.66%
😭
2,445
2.86%
😁
1,043
1.22%
💋
512
0.598%
👏
444
0.519%
🎉
378
0.442%
🤔
362
0.423%
😱
193
0.226%
🍌
142
0.166%
🍓
132
0.154%
🗿
109
0.127%
🌚
57
0.067%
1 further kind
45
0.053%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 341 of the 341 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85,587 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
385
across the posts below
Posts paid on
113
of 341 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
58
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Milaha_Nataha. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 341 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🐲 | НОВЫЙ СОСТАВ TEAM SPIRIT!
Я только выложил видос про то, что официального решения ещё нет, и официальное решение выкатили. ну чтож, ждём, когда Мага просто уйдёт в другую команду. (мипошка и таксист официально в отпуске. хотя все всё и так понимают)
🗡 • Yatoro | 🏹 • Larl | 🛡 • Batyuk | 🔥 • NOTME | ✨ • rue | 🎧 • Illidan
🥹 — грустно
вчера наконец-то посмотрел «книгу илая». фильм около месяца лежал у Меня в заметках, а Я вообще очень редко откладываю что-то на потом.
и это просто пиздец как хорошо. делание пересмотреть его появилось ещё где-то на середине фильма.
Я обожаю фильмы, сериалы и игры за мелочи. за детали, на которые создатели потратили кучу времени, хотя большинство зрителей их даже не заметит. Мне безумно нравится всё это разглядыва…
😡 | PGL WALLACHIA IX \ DAY 3
на утро самые не интересные игры на Мой взгляд. а вот ближе к обеду уже начнётся жара. будете смотреть как скитер играет в 🅰️?
• 🎮 2.17х | 🦞 1.79х
• 🅰️ 1.23х | 🦞 5.00х
• 🦞 1.72х | 🤡 2.33х
• 😒 2.13х | 🐀 1.85х
• 🫂 2.08х | 🐈 1.89х
• 🔵 1.56х | 🪽 2.70х
• 🐶 2.27х | 🐲 1.75х
• 🪿 1.56х | 🇺🇦 2.70х
🔮 | лучшие коэффициенты на Polymarket!
Я ненавижу лавку конфет.
300+ прокрутов: 0 аркан, чайник с палкой на элдер сисяна и щит на свена.
Я не понимаю, как вам так везёт. такое ощущение, что чем жирнее аккаунт, тем сильнее габен лично следит, чтобы тебе не выпало нихуя.
уже заебался менять конфеты на курьеров.
Я вот столько лет играю в доту, и даже у Меня бывают девиантные наклонности.
есть герой, на котором у Меня нихуя не получается, но Я продолжаю его пикать просто потому, что он Мне нравится.
а у вас такой есть ?))
а ещё попробуйте угадать, на каком герое у Меня этот умопомрачительный винрейт.
теперь уже принципиально хочу добить на нём 25%.
WWS SEASON 4
Мне интереснее всего будет глянуть игру Старого Боба и Дахао.
как думаете кто выиграет ?
Stariy Bog Club [❤️👊❤️] Daxak Club
— ❤️ • 1.89 | ❤️ • 2.00 [19:00 МСК]
Stray Club [❤️👊🚘] Cooman Club
— ❤️ • 1.61 | 🚘 • 2.04 [13:30 МСК]
🔮 | лучшие коэффициенты на Polymarket!
пока вы сладко спите, чтобы на утро не опоздать в школу, Я тут в свою очередь записал пять видосов и сейчас сижу монтирую активненько.
ночные жители, а вы как там ?)
Showing the 12 most recent of 341 posts we hold for @Milaha_Nataha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 12 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
где-то полгода назад снимал уже видео на похожую тему. сейчас, так понимаю, это стало ещё актуальнее. Я решил снять повторно, только чуть улучшить этот видос.
делай.72%
нет.28%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
гайз, кто-то из вас смотрел магическую битву? у Меня товарищ уже на протяжении двух лет говорит, чтобы глянул. времени вообще не было. вот сейчас хочу приступить к просмотру.
😢 — не надо.52%
🥴 — да, посмотри!53%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Обычно, когда заканчивается инт, проходит где-то две недели, +/-, и valve выкатывают буквенный патч. но поскольку у нас постепенно буквы заканчиваются, есть на этот счёт небольшие сомнения
😲 — должен выйти43%
👩🚒 — ничего не выйдет62%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 341 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наташа два баша | DOTA 2” (@Milaha_Nataha), 120,126 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Milaha_Nataha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.