🤔عذراً عن التأخير ، بوقت ما من مساء هذا اليوم ينزل واني بسباق مع الزمن لأكماله لكن تفاصيل ومعلومات كثيرة وما اعتقد عندي قدرة انزله ملف اذا نزل على شكل ملف يحتاج ارفق معاه صور وملحقات اضافية .
❤3

Channel
@MilitaryArchiveIraq
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,699subscribers
+88 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001869834402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @hist1950ory @MilitaryArchiveIraq |
| Description | "ننشر صوراً وفديوهات عسكرية لأغراض الأرشفة والتوثيق فقط، ملتزمون بنشر الحقيقة. نقوم أيضاً بإعداد ونشر تحليلات وتقارير وآخر التحديثات المتعلقة بالصراعات الماضية والحاضرة وتوثيقها، مع تغطية بعض الأخبار العاجلة، وشرح الأسلحة الحديثة واخر تطوراتها . |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MilitaryArchiveIraq |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@MilitaryArchiveIraq was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 13:22 | 5,699 | +36 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 5,663 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 08:22 | 5,675 | no change |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:47 | 5,675 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 5,673 | +14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 5,659 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 5,678 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 5,673 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 5,669 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 5,668 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 5,663 | +21 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:07 | 5,642 | +10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 5,632 | +8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:14 | 5,624 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 5,620 | +9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 5,611 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 5,611 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (7 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 7,403 |
| Reactions total | 124 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
261 reactions across 38 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 58.2% | |
| 🤣 | 44 | 16.9% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 9.20% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 5.36% | |
| 🫡 | 14 | 5.36% | |
| 👎 | 10 | 3.83% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.766% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.383% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 261 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MilitaryArchiveIraq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤔عذراً عن التأخير ، بوقت ما من مساء هذا اليوم ينزل واني بسباق مع الزمن لأكماله لكن تفاصيل ومعلومات كثيرة وما اعتقد عندي قدرة انزله ملف اذا نزل على شكل ملف يحتاج ارفق معاه صور وملحقات اضافية .
❤3
جهاز مكافحة الإرهاب ينشر
❤7🫡2👍1
ناقلة النفط MT SIBU1 🌟 التي أُعلن عن تحريرها من قبضة القراصنة في بونتلاند، وسط تداول روايات ركزت على مشاركة نحو 40 شخصاً من عشيرة الشغانبة🇮🇶، فيما تُظهر المعطيات المتداولة أن شرطة بونتلاند البحرية (PMPF) كانت القوة المحورية في تنفيذ العملية، بينما شاركت عناصر العشائر كقوة ساندة. ووفقاً للرواية المتداولة، استمر التخطيط للعملية نحو 48 ساعة، بعدما طالب القراصنة👮♀️ بفدية قدرها 3 ملايين دولار مقابل السفينة، التي كان من ا…
❤6
Signed S
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed S
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣12
نشرت رويترز تقريرًا لوكالة الدفاع الأوروبية، حيث يذكر التقرير أن الدول لا تزيد من قدراتها العسكرية بالسرعة الكافية، وأن الاستثمارات تتحول ببطء إلى زيادة حقيقية في القدرات الدفاعية. وهذا ينطبق على جميع المجالات، بدءًا من القوات البرية وصولًا إلى البحرية والدفاع الجوي والطائرات بدون طيار. ببساطة، الأموال المخصصة لصناعة الدفاع في أوروبا، كما هو الحال في أمريكا، لا تستثمر في توسيع القدرات الإنتاجية والبحث والتطوير وما إ…
Signed ⋆⋆ ⋆ ⋆
أفادت صحيفة "واشنطن بوست" بأن البنتاغون رفع بهدوء حصيلته الرسمية لأفراد القوات الأمريكية الذين أصيبوا خلال الحرب مع إيران بمقدار 37 إصابة، ليصل الإجمالي إلى 861. وتشمل الإصابات المسجلة حديثاً 29 بحاراً من البحرية وثمانية عناصر من مشاة البحرية (المارينز)، دون أن تفصح وزارة الدفاع عن توقيت أو ملابسات إصابتهم. وذكر مسؤول في البحرية أن جميع البحارة الـ 29 قد عادوا إلى الخدمة منذ ذلك الحين.
🤣9🥰1
Signed ⋆⋆ ⋆ ⋆
الجيش الأمريكي⭐️ يستخدم ليزرات قتالية لتدمير الطائرات بدون طيار🇮🇷🚀 في مضيق هرمز.
🤣8👍1
Signed ⋆⋆ ⋆ ⋆
🚨🚨تواجه جهود إعادة إطلاق محادثات السلام بين الولايات المتحدة🇺🇸 وإيران 🇮🇷 معارضة من السعودية والإمارات🇦🇪🇸🇦، اللتين تدعوان واشنطن إلى مواصلة العقوبات والحصار البحري بدلًا من تقديم تنازلات لطهران، وفقًا لصحيفة «وول ستريت جورنال». وفي المقابل، تسعى قطر وعُمان إلى استئناف المفاوضات، ربما في وقت مبكر من الأسبوع المقبل، عبر مقترح يتضمن وقفًا للقتال لمدة سبعة أيام وإعادة فتح مضيق هرمز بشكل تدريجي. وبحسب الصحيفة، تريد السعودي…
❤3
🚨🚨تضاربت التقارير بشأن استئناف المفاوضات بين إيران🇮🇷 والولايات المتحدة؛ إذ نفت إيران ما أوردته «أكسيوس» و«الجزيرة» عن انطلاق جولة جديدة من المفاوضات، مؤكدةً أن ما نُشر حول استئناف المحادثات وإيفاد خبراء فنيين إيرانيين إلى نيويورك غير صحيح، واعتبرت أن هذه التقارير تهدف إلى التأثير في الأسواق وأسعار النفط، وفق مصدر إيراني مطلع نقلت عنه وكالة «فارس». في المقابل، نقلت «رويترز» عن مسؤول أميركي قوله، في تعليق على خطة الأيا…
❤3
Signed ⋆⋆ ⋆ ⋆
ترامب رفض الهدنة المقترحة من إيران والتي مدتها سبعة أيام، وأخبر مساعديه سرًا أنه يتوقع استئناف القصف على إيران بعد انتخابات التجديد النصفي في شهر نوفمبر، وفقًا لصحيفة "وول ستريت جورنال". وقال مسؤولون أمريكيون إن الرئيس ترامب ليس لديه نية لإنهاء الحصار، معتقدين أن الضغط الاقتصادي المستمر سيجبر إيران على قبول مطالب واشنطن. على الرغم من استمرار المفاوضات غير المباشرة من خلال قطر ووساطاء إقليميين آخرين، إلا أن ترامب يش…
❤3👍1👎1🥰1
Signed ⋆⋆ ⋆ ⋆
في 2 فبراير 2007، وثّقت كاميرا مراقبة لحظة انفجار سيارة مفخخة استهدفت رتلاً عسكرياً تابعاً للقوات الأمريكية قرب محيط معسكر التاجي شمال بغداد، وتظهر اللقطات التوقيت عند نحو الساعة 3:55 عصراً،ونُسب الهجوم في ذلك الوقت إلى «دو.لة العراق الإسلامية»، المظلة التي كانت تضم تنظيم القـ/ـاعدة في العراق، والتي أعلنت مسؤوليتها عنه في بيان على موقعها الرسمي أسفر الهجوم عن مقتل جنديين امريكيين و ٢٩ جريح أمريكي . #ارشيف_الشرق_الأو…
❤10👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @MilitaryArchiveIraq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ذاكرة عسكرية” (@MilitaryArchiveIraq), 5,699 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MilitaryArchiveIraq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.