Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 娜娜 新人初次下海

Channel

娜娜 新人初次下海

@Minana06789

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

321subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003930235575
TypeChannel
Username@Minana06789
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 2 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Minana06789

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

321358339.58 August 2026 — 358 subscribers8 August 2026 — 358 subscribers23 August 2026 — 350 subscribers31 August 2026 — 342 subscribers10 September 2026 — 326 subscribers18 September 2026 — 321 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 315–364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:57321-5
10 Sept 2026, 10:36326-16
31 Aug 2026, 11:54342-8
23 Aug 2026, 13:14350-8
8 Aug 2026, 06:35358no change
8 Aug 2026, 05:05358first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 25s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
571.4%
👍114.3%
🤔114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC641 viewsread 8 August 2026

深圳·乱世俏佳人 群里有现金福利、白嫖福利、水群福利等各项福利 佳人群: https://t.me/abtmjojneneneny 佳人榜单: https://t.me/xxxmmmjjja 佳人报告: https://t.me/xienduendj 那些年·错过的女孩: https://t.me/abtmchoosese 佳人备用群: https://t.me/Sz_Choosese

23 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC588 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bantianchiji

#狼友投稿 @Minana067 #龙华 娜娜 看到老师的资料,很是心动,约了老师时间 .到达课室见到老师,人照没啥差别,五官精致耐看,很有气质,淡妆,底子很好,笑起来也很好看,有种跟初恋女友的感觉,跟老师聊了一会 开始进入正题开始陪洗,看到老师下面无毛,一问老师说前两天才去美容院仪器脱毛要做一个白虎,我笑了笑,摸了摸,擦干净后来到床上开始服务,口的还可以,口硬了之后开始让老师戴套开干,换了两个姿势就被老师紧实的妹妹给缴械了,中场休息的时候又继续各种聊天,不会冷场,第二回就状态在线,和老师缠绵了很久才射给老师,很不错的一次体验, 感觉时间过得太快 ,必返 By zhang jie

15 Jul 2026, 09:30 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 8 August 2026

#娜娜 已在老友会验证上榜 ❗️点击👉 @szxglyhglBot 进入机器人查阅老师榜。 t.me/szxglyhglBot?start=-1002640036076 没有群主只有玩家,纯交流纯分享群 ,分享优质老师,发掘优秀新人。

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Minana06789. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“娜娜 新人初次下海” (@Minana06789), 321 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Minana06789.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.