Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MiningGRAM ChannelπŸ“’

Channel

MiningGRAM ChannelπŸ“’

@MiningGRAM_channel

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

27,210subscribers

+25,575 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004410318800
TypeChannel
Username@MiningGRAM_channel
DescriptionEarn free GRAM for doing little things. Official announcement channel and daily mining codes. πŸ€– @MiningGRAM_Bot X: x.com/mininggram Collab: @crack_h
Created26 August 2026 β€” measured β€” dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MiningGRAM_channel

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,63527,21014,422.529 August 2026 β€” 1,635 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 1,635 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 4,326 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 6,908 subscribers6 September 2026 β€” 8,782 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 11,978 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 13,672 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 14,521 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 15,031 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 27,210 subscribers29 August 202618 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 21 days, net +25,575. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:2027,210+12,179
16 Sept 2026, 10:3815,031+510
14 Sept 2026, 19:1514,521+849
13 Sept 2026, 03:0013,672+1,694
11 Sept 2026, 02:5611,978+3,196
6 Sept 2026, 12:408,782+1,874
2 Sept 2026, 06:396,908+2,582
30 Aug 2026, 03:434,326+2,691
29 Aug 2026, 04:301,635no change
29 Aug 2026, 04:151,635first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
46.5%
avg views Γ· 27,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held64 (26 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total771,053
Reactions total21,670
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 05:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
64
Links
68

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21,670 reactions across 61 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀10,94350.5%
πŸ‘3,52916.3%
πŸ”₯2,25610.4%
😭1,7878.25%
🀩8233.80%
❀‍πŸ”₯4442.05%
πŸ’―3371.56%
🌚2911.34%
πŸ‘€2891.33%
😈2421.12%
⚑1980.914%
😍1740.803%
πŸ™ˆ1060.489%
πŸ†’1040.48%
πŸ‘Ž500.231%
πŸ’˜290.134%
🀬240.111%
😑180.083%
πŸ–•100.046%
😴60.028%
2 further kinds100.046%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 21,670 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTCβ‰ˆ7,840 views269 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Less than 1 day left ‼️ t.me/MiningGRAM_Bot/mine

❀130😭53πŸ”₯38🀩28πŸ‘18😈2

23 Sept 2026, 19:55 UTCβ‰ˆ11,000 views359 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

πŸ›‘ Code: APPROACH πŸ’° Reward: 1,000 DUST πŸ”„ Only 3,500 first claims. Claim it by opening this link and pressing β€œMINE”

❀213πŸ”₯49🀩26πŸ‘25😭18😍10πŸ‘€7🌚5

23 Sept 2026, 19:53 UTCβ‰ˆ10,800 views130 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀75πŸ‘24πŸ”₯16πŸ™ˆ8πŸ‘€3πŸ’˜3🌚1

23 Sept 2026, 19:46 UTCβ‰ˆ10,700 views302 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Ready for the final code?

πŸ‘140❀83πŸ”₯30🀩24🌚5😈5πŸ‘€4πŸ™ˆ4

23 Sept 2026, 17:40 UTCβ‰ˆ12,800 views380 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Posted without readable text

❀181😭71πŸ”₯53πŸ†’23πŸ‘13🀩12😈9🌚8

23 Sept 2026, 17:32 UTCβ‰ˆ11,900 views195 reactionsread 24 September 2026

1 DAY LEFT 🚨

❀91πŸ”₯31πŸ‘25😭20⚑7🌚5😈4πŸ†’4

23 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTCβ‰ˆ14,500 views258 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Partnership Announcement: Nolaro πŸ“’ We are pleased to announce a partnership post with Nolaro.dev. Build real apps with AI, from idea to launch. Nolaro gives you AI-powered development, live previews, managed backend infrastructure, built-in hosting, and deployment in one platform. No complicated setup. Just describe what you want to build and let Nolaro help bring it to life. πŸš€ Build. Preview. Deploy. Start buil…

❀139πŸ‘62❀‍πŸ”₯25πŸ”₯18😈8πŸ’―3😍3

23 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTCβ‰ˆ12,900 views327 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

πŸ›‘ Code: HOTDEAL πŸ’° Reward: 500 DUST πŸ”„ Only 3,000 first claims. Claim it by opening this link and pressing β€œMINE”

❀188❀‍πŸ”₯30πŸ‘30😭25πŸ”₯11🀩11⚑8πŸ’―8

23 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTCβ‰ˆ12,300 views177 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❀104πŸ‘36πŸ”₯19❀‍πŸ”₯6😈5πŸ’―4πŸ™ˆ2🀩1

23 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTCβ‰ˆ12,000 views254 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

100k Active Users! ❀️ More than 60% of these users have purchased a miner and made profit πŸ”₯ Let’s do more, together! ⚑️ πŸͺ“ Get your own miner to work for you: @MiningGRAM_Bot

❀147πŸ”₯45πŸ‘40😈12❀‍πŸ”₯5😍3🌚2

23 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTCβ‰ˆ10,700 views314 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Ready for the second one?

❀176πŸ‘81πŸ”₯20🀩16😈7😭5❀‍πŸ”₯3🌚3

23 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTCβ‰ˆ12,600 views460 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

πŸ›‘ Code: HOTCAKE πŸ’° Reward: 1,000 DUST πŸ”„ Only 4,000 first claims. Claim it by opening this link and pressing β€œMINE”

❀216πŸ‘121πŸ”₯41❀‍πŸ”₯22😭19🀩18😈10πŸ’―5

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @MiningGRAM_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTCAnonymous Poll1,200 voters approx.

Well done! Now pick your reward…?

  1. 2,000 DUST for 1,000 Activations40%
  2. 4,000 DUST for 500 activations70%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œMiningGRAM ChannelπŸ“’β€ (@MiningGRAM_channel), 27,210 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiningGRAM_channel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.