Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ministerstwo Zdrowia Wolnych Ludzi

Channel

Ministerstwo Zdrowia Wolnych Ludzi

@MinisterstwoZdrowia

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

11,581subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001562505462
TypeChannel
Username@MinisterstwoZdrowia
Created5 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MinisterstwoZdrowia

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,54711,60611,576.56 August 2026 — 11,601 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,601 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,600 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,606 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,603 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,599 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,598 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,599 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,597 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,592 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,590 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,593 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,589 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,585 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,583 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,582 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,576 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,578 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,573 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,569 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,572 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,569 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,572 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,571 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,566 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,564 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,563 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,558 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,551 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,547 subscribers27 September 2026 — 11,581 subscribers11,5816 August 202627 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,538–11,615 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 06:3911,581+34
17 Sept 2026, 18:2111,547-4
15 Sept 2026, 13:1611,551-7
13 Sept 2026, 21:1711,558-5
12 Sept 2026, 05:3611,563-1
10 Sept 2026, 00:5711,564-2
6 Sept 2026, 18:0011,566-5
4 Sept 2026, 09:0111,571-1
2 Sept 2026, 20:3611,572+3
1 Sept 2026, 22:0411,569-3
31 Aug 2026, 21:5411,572+3
30 Aug 2026, 21:1811,569-4
29 Aug 2026, 18:4711,573-4
28 Aug 2026, 19:2411,577-1
27 Aug 2026, 17:0511,578+2
26 Aug 2026, 17:3411,576-6
25 Aug 2026, 19:3611,582-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:1411,583-2
23 Aug 2026, 06:0811,585-4
21 Aug 2026, 16:5811,589first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.42%
avg views ÷ 11,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
744
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.874%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held26 (15 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total1,487
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
37m 20s
Average length
3m 07s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

653 reactions across 25 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43466.5%
👍16925.9%
👏142.14%
😁121.84%
🥰121.84%
🔥91.38%
😱10.153%
🤩10.153%
🤬10.153%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 653 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTC558 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @AmanitaMuscaria40i4Photo

Mikstura Odrobaczająca 💫🧠🫀🫁🤸 Naturalne oczyszczanie organizmu i wsparcie równowagi jelitowej Pojemność: 200 ml Cena: 99 zł Formuła bez alkoholu Organizm człowieka każdego dnia narażony jest na kontakt z różnymi mikroorganizmami, toksynami oraz zanieczyszczeniami środowiskowymi. Styl życia, dieta, kontakt ze zwierzętami czy obniżona odporność mogą wpływać na zaburzenie równowagi jelitowej i ogólnego samopoczucia. Mik…

❤7

1 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC929 views6 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Czy komuś z was udało się urodzić omijając szczepienia? Np. czy są jakieś prywatne placówki?

❤5🤬1

18 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC≈3,100 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Temat Szczepień - porównanie dzieci szczepionych i nieszczepionych

❤24😁1

11 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈4,070 views37 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Szczepić czy nieszczepić? Naukowcy przebadali wszystkie dostępne szczepionki - wszystkie to trucizna?! Www.Alchemycode44.com

👍30❤4👏3

7 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC≈4,930 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Jad pszczeli - metodą na leczenie Raka? Czy Takie metody powinny być natychmiast testosowane? https://t.me/MinisterstwoZdrowia Www.Alchemycode44.com

❤17🥰5🤩1

7 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC≈2,910 views7 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @WojskoweTechnologie5gVideo

Kontrola Umysłu - wywiad z byłym agentem MI5 https://t.me/WojskoweTechnologie5g Www.Alchemycode44.com

👍4❤3

6 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈2,360 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @AmanitaMuscaria40i4Photo

Założyłem Amanitowy profil na instagramie, zapraszam do obserwacji https://www.instagram.com/alchemycode44com?utm_source=qr&igsh=ZWgwczdscGxnemo3

❤18👍2

28 Jul 2026, 09:05 UTC≈3,690 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Najlepsze źródło to świeża żywność , a nie wielkie koncerny https://t.me/MinisterstwoZdrowia Www.Alchemycode44.com

❤21👍14

28 Jul 2026, 08:01 UTC≈3,130 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026

W tradycji rosyjskiej medycyny ludowej i naturopatii, łuszczyca jest postrzegana nie jako choroba skóry, ale jako sygnał, że organizm próbuje pozbyć się toksyn przez największy organ wydalniczy, czyli skórę. Rosyjscy zielarze zgodnie twierdzą, że leczenie zawsze zaczynamy od wnętrza od oczyszczenia wątroby i jelit. Bez oczyszczenia „wewnętrznego filtra”, czyli wątroby, walka na skórze będzie tylko zaleczaniem objawów…

❤27👍4😁1

27 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,690 views25 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Czy chemioterapia może mieć właściwości rakotwórcze? Tekst z czatu naukowego na podstawie badań naukowych - odnośniki do badań w komentarzu. Tak, chemioterapia może mieć właściwości rakotwórcze (kancerogenne). Leki stosowane w leczeniu nowotworów są jednocześnie mutagenne i genotoksyczne, co oznacza, że mogą uszkadzać DNA zdrowych komórek i prowadzić do powstania tzw. wtórnych nowotworów (ang. secondary malignancie…

❤20👍4🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,750 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Niemieccy Naukowcy odkryli pod mikroskopem NanoChipy i Grafen Udostepnij swoim bliskim! Grupa https://t.me/MinisterstwoZdrowiaL Strumień zdrowia https://t.me/MinisterstwoZdrowia

👍12❤5👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @MinisterstwoZdrowia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ministerstwo Zdrowia Wolnych Ludzi” (@MinisterstwoZdrowia), 11,581 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MinisterstwoZdrowia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.