Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MiroFox

Channel

MiroFox

@MiroFoxy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

477subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001894581950
TypeChannel
Username@MiroFoxy
Description🎨 Turning your ideas into colorful art — from sketch to final piece. 📩 DM to order: @Miro_foxy 🔗 Links & prices: mirofoxy.carrd.con My Game - https://t.me/yournumber_game https://yournumbergame.carrd.co/
CreatedBetween 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/MiroFoxy

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:22477first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 477 subscribers
Avg views / post
215
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held18 (8 April 202626 August 2026)
Views total429
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
123
Videos
19
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
48s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

417 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20950.1%
🔥7918.9%
custom 54565224064263184924510.8%
custom 5456571158600096647419.83%
custom 5456157600494131627163.84%
🎉102.40%
💯102.40%
🥰40.959%
😍20.48%
custom 537556019413256980610.24%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MiroFoxy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 April 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC196 views27 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Forwarded from @yournumber_gameVideo

Since I’m much more of a 2D artist than a 3D artist, I decided to lean into that and make Your Number as a pre-rendered 2.5D game like an old horror game.

custom 545652240642631849219custom 54565711586000966477🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC233 views9 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Hi everyone! I decided to separate my personal art from my game project. This channel will stay focused on my personal posts, thoughts, commission artwork, and other things I want to share. For everything related to Your Number, I created a separate channel. There I’ll post game updates, artwork, development progress, characters, locations, gameplay, and other news about the project. So if you’re interested in the ga

custom 54565711586000966479

19 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC306 views23 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5456157600494131627148💯1

18 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC371 views27 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Биомеханоид

🔥197custom 54565711586000966471

10 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC413 views16 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Хоба! 🤸‍♀️

12custom 54565711586000966474

9 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC390 views28 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Базовый завтрак художника

🔥1711

6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC403 views23 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Делаю кости для хвостика))

custom 545657115860009664711🔥6custom 54565224064263184924custom 54561576004941316272

31 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC473 views36 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Карта 3д уровня

🔥19custom 545657115860009664798

19 Jul 2026, 22:48 UTC463 views9 reactionsread 18 September 2026

Уж простите. Но этот матч очн странный. Испанцы играли хорошо, не спорю. Я бы даже сказал лучше . Но меня сука бесит , что у них был доп игрок в виде судьи. Направо и налево накидал нам карточек. Наш упал в лужу и ему же желтая. Испанец сам врезался и крутанул сальто нам красная. Даже тренеру дали жёлтую! Только у наших мяч и они бегут к воротам противника, сразу свисток. Я в шоке. Судья конч P.s Мартинес красавчик ❤

💯9

15 Jul 2026, 23:28 UTC505 views14 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥122

15 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC427 views10 reactionsread 18 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🎉82

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MiroFoxy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dólar Blue - Cotización
@dolarbluearg · 23,464
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 18 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MiroFox” (@MiroFoxy), 477 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MiroFoxy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.