Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐌𝐫.𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐬

Channel

𝐌𝐫.𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐬

@Mister_rollsik

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,299subscribers

-700 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002487138790
TypeChannel
Username@Mister_rollsik
DescriptionДля сотрудничества @danil_rollz Купить звезды 1.4₽=1зв - @rolls_starsBot Или @danil_rollz Чат ОТС: @Rolls_OTC *Информация на канале не является финансовой рекомендацией
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mister_rollsik

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2997,0006,649.58 August 2026 — 6,999 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,000 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,948 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,919 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,844 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,816 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,787 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,754 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,729 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,662 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,632 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,609 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,550 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,517 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,497 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,428 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,385 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,352 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,337 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,330 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,321 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,310 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,299 subscribers8 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net -700. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,194–7,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:376,299-11
1 Nov 2026, 06:586,310-11
29 Oct 2026, 01:306,321-9
26 Oct 2026, 04:566,330-7
23 Oct 2026, 02:186,337-15
20 Oct 2026, 11:286,352-33
17 Oct 2026, 06:366,385-43
14 Oct 2026, 08:306,428-69
10 Oct 2026, 23:216,497-20
5 Oct 2026, 01:576,517-33
25 Sept 2026, 18:376,550-59
17 Sept 2026, 04:386,609-23
13 Sept 2026, 12:396,632-30
9 Sept 2026, 22:026,662-67
5 Sept 2026, 01:196,729-25
1 Sept 2026, 07:146,754-33
29 Aug 2026, 00:236,787-29
25 Aug 2026, 18:366,816-28
22 Aug 2026, 10:286,844-75
18 Aug 2026, 15:336,919first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.19%
avg views ÷ 6,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
390
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held65 (5 August 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total390
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
813
Videos
41
Links
582

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
52s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3850.0%
🌚1418.4%
🔥1013.2%
🤩67.89%
🤯56.58%
😈22.63%
👏11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Sept 2026, 21:41 UTC322 viewsread 5 November 2026

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ на еще одну статую свободы По старинке кто первый выбивает , тот и получает Крутить строго в коммах под постом ❗️ Все выдачи в тгк @vidacha_podarkov Приз рандом фигурка / тоны/ звезды

27 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC256 viewsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @GiftsROVideo

🐸 Неужели! Закончена третья работа по улучшению золотой коллекции на чёрном фоне! Вашему вниманию: https://t.me/bIackkro/c/11 (3.0) Хочу выразить большую благодарность боту конструктору, и его владельцу (гению). С их помощью разработка моей коллекции стала намного проще, бот конструктор — @GiftConstruct_Bot! Также хочу выразить отдельную благодарность @lunaris_vault / @Lunaris_Vault_Base_Bot и его владельцу — этот…

25 Sept 2026, 20:37 UTC150 viewsread 5 November 2026
Video

Pixelmania is live ⛏ 10 million pixels. Hidden under one of them: 1,000,000 Stars ⭐️ Plus, gifts are hidden across the map 🎁 Your first pixel is free. Get another free pixel for every friend you invite. Don’t miss your chance. Round 1 is live. Join now! @pixel_mania_bot Pixelmania запущена ⛏ 10 миллионов пикселей. Под одним из пикселей: 1 000 000 Stars ⭐️ А еще по карте спрятаны подарки 🎁 Первый пиксель — бес…

14 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC248 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026

«УДАЛЁННЫЕ ПОДАРКИ» БОЛЬШЕ НЕ ПОДАРИТЬ 🎄🎁🎂🧸🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁🎁 ✈️Telegram прикрыл данную функцию. Эх, сколько бизнесменов перекосил один фикс… Каждый второй барыжил удалёнными подарками втридорога. RIP 😁 🎁- Не знал как их дарить.. 🤩- Минус темка ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖

❤1

5 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC265 viewsread 5 November 2026

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ на еще одну статую свободы По старинке кто первый выбивает , тот и получает Крутить строго в коммах под постом ❗️ Все выдачи в тгк @vidacha_podarkov Приз рандом фигурка / тоны/ звезды

2 Sept 2026, 18:34 UTC291 viewsread 5 November 2026

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ на еще одну статую свободы По старинке кто первый выбивает , тот и получает Крутить строго в коммах под постом ❗️ Все выдачи в тгк @vidacha_podarkov Приз рандом фигурка / тоны/ звезды

31 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC302 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🛍 Rolls Stars — звёзды, Premium и TON в одном боте ⭐ Нужны звёзды на баланс или подарок друзьям? Или хочешь продать свои звёзды или канал с звездами за TON на кошелёк? Тебе к нам! 🤖 Что может наш бот?: ▪ Покупка Telegram Stars — мгновенная выдача после оплаты ▪ Telegram Premium — оформляем быстро ▪ TON — покупка и вывод на твой Tonkeeper ▪ Выкуп звёзд — отдаём TON за твои звёзды, также скупаем каналы 🔒 Без пре…

29 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC206 views0 reactionsread 5 November 2026

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ на СТАТУЮ НА БЛЕК ФОНЕ. По старинке: кто первый выбивает 7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣, тот и получает 🏆 Крутить строго в коммах под постом ❗️ Все выдачи в тгк @vidacha_podarkov 📦

27 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC776 viewsread 5 November 2026

7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣ на Genie Lamp 🎁 По старинке: кто первый выбивает 7️⃣7️⃣7️⃣, тот и получает 🏆 Крутить строго в коммах под постом !!❗️ Все выдачи в тгк @vidacha_podarkov 📦

27 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC232 viewsread 5 November 2026

Я выдал приз , но в следующие разы никому больше не выдам

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @Mister_rollsik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Mister_rollsik edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Mister_rollsik as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
18 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Сделать розыгрыш на неулучш ручку ?

  1. Газ53%
  2. Скип49%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐌𝐫.𝐑𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐬” (@Mister_rollsik), 6,299 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mister_rollsik.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.