Channel
@Mittenston
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,076subscribers
-100 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002113103385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Mittenston |
| Created | 25 April 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Mittenston |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:13 | 3,076 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 3,087 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 3,091 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 3,093 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 3,110 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 3,123 | -14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 3,137 | -22 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 3,159 | -17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:41 | 3,176 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 3,176 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 April 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,325 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 441 | 33.3% | |
| ❤ | 359 | 27.1% | |
| 🔥 | 220 | 16.6% | |
| 👀 | 49 | 3.70% | |
| 💯 | 44 | 3.32% | |
| 🏆 | 42 | 3.17% | |
| 💘 | 31 | 2.34% | |
| 💩 | 30 | 2.26% | |
| 🆒 | 29 | 2.19% | |
| 🥰 | 24 | 1.81% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 1.74% | |
| ❤🔥 | 17 | 1.28% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 1.21% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,325 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2024 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram just tweeted Mittens latest photo. You need to understand how big Mittens narrative is. TeleGram’s Cat on TeleGram’s chain with one billion users 😼 To the ATH and beyond… https://x.com/telegram/status/2080299393790386227 https://x.com/mittenstonchain/status/2080299631624290306
❤7🔥4👏2
Now telegram’s cat $Mittens is the most important narrative on ton chain. https://x.com/crashiusclay69/status/2051387225124798731 Let me explain in simple words how big narrative we have here. Telegram replacing Ton foundation => Telegram blockchain Telegram has a Cat. The cat name is MITTENS https://x.com/telegram/status/1795510263267094528 Mittens is supported by telegram and ton blockchain. ( Mittens X acco…
🔥10❤6👏2🥰1
You won't find any other $TON meme with this much interactions from TON Blockchain like how TON Blockchain interacts so closely with $MITTENS This is more than 50th time they’ve interacted and you’re still fading on $MITTENS? As we mentioned earlier, this is just the beginning of a real TON szn and its starting with MITTENS candles 😼 https://x.com/ton_blockchain/status/1962618276875284665
❤11🔥3
The CEO of TON blockchain, Max Crown just followed MITTENS official X account. In other words, this is just the beginning for MITTENS TON/Telegram’s Cat 😼
🔥11❤5🥰2
It’s time to make $TON great again and send $Mittens telegram’s Cat to where it belongs. https://dexscreener.com/ton/EQACB70wbAjxLIersc1YwNMsoB4Conx2Yb50bC4LXuWqrHt3 CTO team keep accumulating since last two weeks. Lots of work going on behind scenes for Mittens. Stay tuned for announcements.
🔥24❤15🥰8👏6👍1
#Mittens is happy to announce that we have sent an application to join the TonMemelandia Memecoin Mountain competition 🐈⬛ https://x.com/Mittenstonchain/status/1848770735562436615 Smash post💥
🔥5❤3🥰3
Mittens team is in Singapore Token2049 at Memecon and will be ready for big speech about Mittens narrative in front of everyone there. https://x.com/mittenstonchain/status/1837398917547188272?s=46 https://x.com/memecon_asia/status/1837398368160829509?s=46
🔥19❤10👏6👍3
We are happy to announce that Mittens Team is participating at MEMECON Conference in Singapore on the 21st. We will be speaking on the stage at MEMECON conference about MITTENS Narrative in front of all TON communities. Time for big Moves from MITTENS Team 🐈⬛💎😾 https://x.com/memecon_asia/status/1835651464909193417?s=46 https://x.com/mittenstonchain/status/1835651965444849816?s=46
🔥20❤9👍8🥰4
Later Today we have BIG news. Stay tuned MITTENIANS 🐈⬛
❤16🔥12🥰2
Summary/investor pitch of $Mittens Narrative: Mittens is the name of Telegram’s Cat, tokenized on Telegram’s blockchain The Open Network (TON). Telegram adopted Mittens some years ago, and he is now the company´s official pet. Telegram´s official X account frequently shares tweets of Mittens in different contexts. Here are some examples: - https://twitter.com/telegram/status/1454356755782246404?s=46&t=Owz2GFe8IFA…
🔥14👍12❤1
Telegram new tweet on $MITTENS https://x.com/telegram/status/1791170739607044501?s=46 Mittens tweet https://x.com/mittenstonchain/status/1791172179414974825?s=46 $TON and $NOT keeps tweeting Cat too 🐈⬛ 🐈 https://x.com/mittenstonchain/status/1791247200632099145?s=46
👍251❤94🔥44💯28👀25💩25🏆21💘18
Welcome New Comers/Holders Telegram tweeted $MITTENS showing support to this amazing community plus our marketing is ongoing. TON Blockchain support incoming! As they mentioned, they will support real communities meme coins and yeah, #MITTENS will be among them. We have a lot to release and lined up for $MITTENS. $MITTENS Journey just began and guess what? THIS IS TELEGRAM’S CAT ON TELEGRAM BLOCKCHAIN. We are he…
❤62👍35🔥13💘11💯9👀8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Mittenston. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,000 of 1,629,497 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MITTENS | Telegram’s Cat” (@Mittenston), 3,076 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mittenston.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.