🤩成都·猫窝工作室 以带给兄弟们高性价比的妹子为目标!一边挣钱一边挖掘好老师! 承诺: 下菜必赔! 车库: https://t.me/CDMaoWo 聊天: https://t.me/MaoWoGZS 客服: @maowoxiaokefu 同时承接东门全套海选工作室! 每天20+妹子任选! 打造成都最低价海选场! 👋欢迎兄弟们前来评鉴~
❤8

Channel
@MmFulidafangsong
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,314subscribers
+2,357 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003514450352 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @MmFulidafangsong |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/MmFulidafangsong |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 15:40 | 22,314 | +48 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 22,266 | +68 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 22,198 | +67 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 22,131 | +78 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 22,053 | +102 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 21,951 | +132 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 21,819 | +72 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:14 | 21,747 | +59 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:32 | 21,688 | +75 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:07 | 21,613 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 21,617 | +18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:39 | 21,599 | +60 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 21,539 | +74 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 21,465 | +112 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 21,353 | +79 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 21,274 | +77 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 21,197 | +108 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 21,089 | +61 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 21,028 | +80 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 20,948 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (8 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 61,470 |
| Reactions total | 112 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
414 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 343 | 82.9% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 2.66% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 1.93% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.483% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤩成都·猫窝工作室 以带给兄弟们高性价比的妹子为目标!一边挣钱一边挖掘好老师! 承诺: 下菜必赔! 车库: https://t.me/CDMaoWo 聊天: https://t.me/MaoWoGZS 客服: @maowoxiaokefu 同时承接东门全套海选工作室! 每天20+妹子任选! 打造成都最低价海选场! 👋欢迎兄弟们前来评鉴~
❤8
花名: #芷青 车牌: @Yongdaimei520 坐标: #成都 特点:舌钉 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤9👍3
女用春药实测视频 借由频道金主药王利哥搬运:@lige911 后续预计会与某位老师一起合作,由本猫实测拍摄~ 兄弟们想看哪个老师的可以在评论区留言~ 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤11👍2
花名: #小颜 车牌: @xiaoshigongzuoshi 坐标: #成都 特点:极品白虎 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤22👍5👏1
花名: #黎吧啦 3p 车牌: @libalabao 坐标: #成都 由于以前的机器人老炸 现在换了个新的~也不影响兄弟们看以前的福利~ 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤18🔥4
花名: #母女之家 车牌: @Jmother688 坐标: #成都 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤28👍1
花名: #雪宝宝 车牌: @xuebb678 坐标: #成都 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤22👏4
🥳成都外围🥳全国包养🥳全国外围 🥳成都外围 全成都最靠谱最真实的外围资源 质量严选,优惠活动最多 带给您最好最优惠的外围体验。 外围频道: @gougedh_bot 反馈频道: t.me/chengduwaiweibaogao 🥳全国包养 https://t.me/paidaxingby 入会享6折,7888仅需4800,6888仅需4200,不满意可退可换,支持担保平台 🥳全国外围 https://t.me/gougequanguoww 在狗哥这里安排,如果出现人照差距大,AI视频或者见到人以后您不满意,全程您一分钱不用出,车费我自己报销
❤7
花名: #黎吧啦 车牌: @libalabao 坐标: #成都 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤25
主打少萝😀、御姐👍、真实在校学生等良家😀 介绍费首单7折(会员费抵扣后仅需4100😞 能享受快节奏的恋爱 各求所需 妹妹颜值普遍都很高价格实惠 双方一起体检还能无套😊 选妃频道:https://t.me/luolibyqg 交流群组:https://t.me/yueguangjiaoliu2 唯一客服: @xiaoyue334488 好兄弟的平价包养群 兄弟们有备无患 告别低三下四地四处求课 来试试锁车的滋味
❤8👍1
花名: #佐佐 车牌: @zz6688zzj 坐标: #成都 报告链接 福利内容见评论区❣️
❤24💯8👍1
兄弟们给大家推荐一家 💥成都商K战袍裸嗨游戏场 每晚150~200佳丽出勤海选🥰 🥰特色玩法不限于: 高山流水 / 处女膜 / 冰火两重天 / 九宫格 / 舌尖诱惑 / 10点半 / 找老婆…等等几十种福利荤游戏玩到你腿抽筋…… 🥰后场关灯收手机 沙发激情舞蹈|互动近身真空秀 脱衣舞 黑丝白丝撕到只剩下小内内…… 成渝商K 认准李富贵🥳 🔥预定点这里🔥 🔥玩法介绍🔥 🔥全国预定点这里🔥 🔥点此加入组队福利群🔔 👍📱 19382386106 #成都商K #真空游戏裸嗨场
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @MmFulidafangsong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“铲屎官的福利放送” (@MmFulidafangsong), 22,314 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MmFulidafangsong.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.