Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144–163 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 13:41
161
+4
9 Sept 2026, 12:19
157
+3
31 Aug 2026, 21:38
154
-1
25 Aug 2026, 03:04
155
+9
10 Aug 2026, 07:00
146
no change
10 Aug 2026, 06:49
146
first reading
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
48s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
46 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5249106040426889840
14
30.4%
custom 5249009601231224691
11
23.9%
custom 5345984422267092490
9
19.6%
custom 5278389694386706091
5
10.9%
custom 5345884280809618506
4
8.70%
custom 5348526836747894323
2
4.35%
custom 5350459468951854583
1
2.17%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️ 🕊️ 🕊️🕊️🕊️
В косплей комьюнитиии)
Спасибо всем кто поддерживал меня весь этот год, он был незабываемым и я надеюсь, что и дальше буду вдохновляться новыми косплеями))
Спасибо моим любимым косбентам)
Как старфолл, филисетт, ран мара дори))
Всем моим друзьям, Андертейкеру, Больному сердцу, Футтри, Лань, Мид найту, Бобо, Полиле, Сане, Айко, Викс, Арине))соне,и всем всем всем)) с кем я хоть и знакома но может…
🔘🔘🔘🔘🔘
А вот прикиньте теперь я буду на Лире..) и буду спонсором, резкий поворот событий неправда?)) думаю я буду в косплее на Арлекино, но если не получиться в нём то буду по классике в своей любимой Мао Мао))
Делайте репосты))
Ставьте реакции))
🔘🔘🔘🔘
У меня вся галерея в этом, извините но, я надеюсь что скоро уже сделаю косплей на эту несчастную Тофф, на неё парик стоит 4-6 тыс. Мама мне страшно, если кому не сложно можете чуть чуть помочь.. Вдруг что то подешевле найдёте)) а так как у кого дела? У меня шикарно) 9 августа скорее всего буду на фестивале спустя 4 месяца 😳
Ставьте реакции)
Вам не сложно мне приятно))
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @MmaAUuaALoVe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Майка^” (@MmaAUuaALoVe), 161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MmaAUuaALoVe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
