Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
11.7 average views per post against 12,990 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.09%. Across the 4,423 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,617 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.30% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.79%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (20 August 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Posts measured
323 of 323 published in the window (323 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
3,763
Mature posts only
0.176% over 44 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 19 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,915–13,001 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 00:21
12,990
+25
15 Sept 2026, 19:18
12,965
-10
14 Sept 2026, 02:21
12,975
-3
12 Sept 2026, 11:17
12,978
-5
10 Sept 2026, 10:18
12,983
+1
7 Sept 2026, 05:22
12,982
-9
4 Sept 2026, 12:17
12,991
+8
1 Sept 2026, 22:57
12,983
+6
31 Aug 2026, 21:37
12,977
-8
31 Aug 2026, 01:04
12,985
-2
30 Aug 2026, 02:55
12,987
-2
29 Aug 2026, 05:45
12,989
+2
28 Aug 2026, 08:34
12,987
-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:43
12,989
+12
26 Aug 2026, 03:52
12,977
-8
25 Aug 2026, 00:58
12,985
+7
23 Aug 2026, 11:45
12,978
-2
21 Aug 2026, 19:03
12,980
-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:36
12,984
-1
19 Aug 2026, 13:25
12,985
first reading
Engagement
623 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.09%
avg views ÷ 12,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.7
319 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
319
of 623 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 319 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
623 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
3,729
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 10s
Average length
1m 22s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
71.4%
👍
2
28.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 623 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 623 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😢 لكل زوجين هذه علامات تسبق النهاية للعلاقة الزوجية … اكتشفها هنا الآن 👇🏼
https://t.me/fwayiid/20836
💭 كلمات قليلة… ودرر كثيرة 👇🏻
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
💯للدعم @Al_foursan
▶️لتصحيح قراءة القرآن للرجال والنساء🔽
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
💕همسات في قلوب الفتيات⬇
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
🎆خطوات بسيطة لحياة ايجابية⬇️
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
🕯علاج التعثر في حفظ القرآن الكريم⬇️
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
👀أشياء تدمرك نفسياً حاول تتخلص منها⬇
t.me/addlist/_eABvLbF6lkwNmI0
👈للإشتراك @Al_foursan 👉
😞 أحيانًا لا تأتي نهاية العلاقة الزوجية فجأة، بل تسبقها إشارات … تعرّف على أبرزها الآن بنفسك 👇🏼
https://t.me/fwayiid/20836
📲 لمحبي الواتساب(حالات قصيرة ورسائل)👇🏻
t.me/addlist/JgtarJZWxmE0Y2E0
💯للدعم @Al_foursan
حكم إسقاط الجنين قبل بلوغه أربعين يومًا
📩 #السؤال :
بارك الله فيكم ، الأخت السائلة في سؤال لها تقول : هل يجوز إنزال الجنين قبل بلوغه أربعين يومًا من بطن أمه؟ وما هو العقاب لمن فعل ذلك؟
📋 #الجواب :
إذا كان هناك حاجة شديدة ومصلحة شرعية لإنزاله في الأربعين ومضرة من بقائه فقد أجاز هذا جمع من أهل العلم ، أما إذا لم يكن هناك مصلحة شرعية ولا حاجة ضرورية فينبغي بقاؤه ؛ لأن إنجاب الأولاد وتكثير الأمة أمر مطلوب شرعًا ، وله…
لِمَن يريد الصلاح لأبنائه!
لا تجعلوا العودةَ إلى المدارس سببًا لانقطاع أبنائكم عن القرآن، وكأنّ كتاب الله أمرٌ زائدٌ يُقبِل عليه المرء حين يتّسع له الوقت، فإذا أقبل غيرُه كان أوّلَ ما يُستغنى عنه! ومن تأمّل أحوال الناشئة رأى أنّ كثيرًا من حفظة كتاب الله هم من المتفوّقين والأوائل في دراستهم وحياتهم.
فاغتنموا مرحلة الطفولة للبدء مبكرًا؛ فالذهن فيها أصفى، والحفظ أسرع رسوخًا قبل تزايد الأعباء. وحددوا لهم وقتًا ووردًا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 623 posts we hold for @Mnhag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 75 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الفقه الإسلامى @AlFiiqh · 29,196 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
دروس ديـنيـة @durus_dinia · 36,433 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 September 2026
البيانُ أسئلة اختبار حفظ القُرآن @Albayanquran · 73,332 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
📖 أكاديمية روح العالمية 📖 @abag25 · 25,974 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
أَهْــ الْقُرْآنِ وَخَاصَّتُه ــلُ💎 @qurraan · 41,375 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
كـن مع الله يكــن الله معــك @ysfgl · 39,224 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
🌦️دعاء الخير 🌦 @doaaalkhayr · 29,924 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
كنوز المعرفة والمعلومات والخواطر @konuz2020 · 81,672 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
همسات انثويه @moslamawoman · 24,749 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
صوتيات منوعة 💟 @FaferoAudioLessons · 23,340 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 September 2026
تأملات 🖼 Reflections @tsamimy · 23,616 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
صدقة جارية 🌴 @sadaqa · 32,890 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 September 2026
مسجات | messages 📩 @messajt · 29,081 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
🌹لمحــــبي النبي ﷺ 🌹حياتنا قرآن وسنة @chbihiilham · 53,901 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
امي الحبيبة @Mom_my_life2019 · 29,244 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
وذكر 𓂆 @GANTK1 · 34,516 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
𓂆 من سيربح المعلومة؟ @GaNtK2 · 29,619 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
كن طموحـــًا @jadadtmwhk · 52,383 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
📜 دُرَرَ مِنْ أقوال السَلَف @SaidDorar · 63,906 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
📅 كل يوم معلومة تفيدك 📅 @arabic_world · 28,448 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
🌴 هذه سنة نبيـﷺـكم 🌴 @Sounat_Anabi · 44,326 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حادي الأرواح إلي بلاد الافراح” (@Mnhag), 12,990 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mnhag.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
