Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -7,398. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,292–21,321 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 07:06
12,420
-183
5 Nov 2026, 05:45
12,603
-129
4 Nov 2026, 05:50
12,732
-158
3 Nov 2026, 08:58
12,890
-10
2 Nov 2026, 05:27
12,900
-112
1 Nov 2026, 01:49
13,012
-51
31 Oct 2026, 00:49
13,063
-83
30 Oct 2026, 01:49
13,146
-50
29 Oct 2026, 05:00
13,196
-58
28 Oct 2026, 04:48
13,254
-24
27 Oct 2026, 03:27
13,278
-36
26 Oct 2026, 01:51
13,314
-12
25 Oct 2026, 04:27
13,326
-56
24 Oct 2026, 02:17
13,382
-33
23 Oct 2026, 02:35
13,415
+1
22 Oct 2026, 01:51
13,414
-7
20 Oct 2026, 21:01
13,421
-10
19 Oct 2026, 22:50
13,431
-4
19 Oct 2026, 01:59
13,435
-6
18 Oct 2026, 00:27
13,441
first reading
Engagement
177 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 177 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
45m 23s
Average length
30s
Measured directly from 92 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
18
40.0%
😁
12
26.7%
🤮
10
22.2%
😢
2
4.44%
👍
1
2.22%
👎
1
2.22%
🔥
1
2.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 177 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 177 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💘طلسم شهوت بند و زبانبند و جلوگیری از خیانت🔐
🔮دعای حصار قوی دفع همزاد و چشم زخم و ابطال سحر عظیم
❣تسخیر و احضار برای جذب و بیقراری و بازگشت معشوق ❤️🔥
💰طلسم الفوز پیروزی در معاملات و جذب ثروت فراوان
🫶گشایش و تسهیل در ازدواج و بخت گشایی سریع💍
🪄گره گشایی و حاجت روایی فوری نازایی زوجین📜
👤مشاوره رایگان و تخصصی با استاد سید حسینی
🆔@Ostad_seyed_hoseyni
📞09213956388
@telesmohajat
همراه با ضمانت کتبی و مهرمغازه و اصالت کاره…
یه پدر خلاق تو اینستا یه پیج داره که برای دخترش با پرینتر سه بعدی کلی چیزای خفن درست میکنه!
اصن این پدر و دختر قشنگ ۲۰ سال جلوتر از ما زندگی می‌کنن :))))
Showing the 12 most recent of 177 posts we hold for @Mnvdarsam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @Mnvdarsam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
طنز تلخ :) @TanzTalkh · 19,130 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 September 2026
کلاسینو | Classino @Clasinu · 38,788 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
hess_ziba @hess_ziba · 3 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 27 August 2026
😂 جَـــــفَـــر مَــــفَــــر 😂 @jafar_mafar · 25,376 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“منو درسام :)” (@Mnvdarsam), 12,420 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mnvdarsam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
