19 measurements spanning 30 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,969–10,073 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 07:19
10,057
-2
4 Sept 2026, 02:41
10,059
-2
1 Sept 2026, 15:27
10,061
+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:36
10,060
+4
30 Aug 2026, 11:38
10,056
+2
29 Aug 2026, 10:13
10,054
+7
28 Aug 2026, 12:03
10,047
+4
27 Aug 2026, 09:54
10,043
+14
26 Aug 2026, 11:48
10,029
+46
23 Aug 2026, 22:06
9,983
+2
20 Aug 2026, 14:42
9,981
-4
17 Aug 2026, 16:16
9,985
-7
14 Aug 2026, 07:34
9,992
-6
11 Aug 2026, 07:53
9,998
-11
10 Aug 2026, 07:20
10,009
+2
9 Aug 2026, 08:51
10,007
-3
7 Aug 2026, 08:33
10,010
-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:30
10,011
no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:18
10,011
first reading
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 10,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,120
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.698%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
36 (9 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
16,765
Reactions total
117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
44s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
215 reactions across 35 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
114
53.0%
❤
44
20.5%
🔥
42
19.5%
🏆
4
1.86%
👏
4
1.86%
❤🔥
2
0.93%
🤝
2
0.93%
🤡
2
0.93%
👌
1
0.465%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 35 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mos_Kad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 36 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌍 Бесплатная земля для каждого россиянина. Звучит почти неприлично хорошо.
Предложено закрепить за каждым совершеннолетним гражданином России право один раз получить до 50 соток бесплатно.
Схема такая:
5 лет - безвозмездное пользование.
Освоил участок - оформляешь его в собственность.
Но самое интересное даже не земля.
Авторы инициативы предлагают передавать участки уже с инфраструктурой - круглогодичной дорогой…
🏛 ЕГРН закрывает режим «просто посмотреть». Теперь сведения - только документом.
С 30 августа 2026 года меняется порядок доступа к данным ЕГРН через ФГИС.
Приказ Росреестра № П/0189/26 устанавливает: сведения будут предоставляться в виде электронной выписки, заверенной УКЭП Роскадастра. Сам заявитель выбирает нужный документ - выписку об объекте, правах, переходах прав, КТП, сведения о ЗОУИТ, территориальных зонах,…
🌊 301-ФЗ ударил по тем, кто строился законно. Теперь государство готовит «спасательную операцию».
Минстрой публично признал: ситуация с запретом строительства в зонах затопления / подтопления стала общероссийской проблемой для стройки.
Уже есть сотни случаев, когда человек получил положительное уведомление о начале строительства, вложил миллионы в дом - а после вступления 301-ФЗ столкнулся с невозможностью его заре…
⚠️ Пока ждём, что государство что-то изменит с зонами затопления / подтопления, сидеть сложа руки необязательно.
Я собрал рабочий чек-лист с двумя маршрутами, как теоретически можно вывести конкретный земельный участок из такой зоны.
Маршрут 1 - перерасчёт границы зоны.
Если есть основания полагать, что существующая граница рассчитана неверно: поднимаем исходные материалы, проверяем рельеф, отметки, гидрологию, дел…
⚠️ Сначала стройку в зонах подтопления остановили. Теперь Минстрой готовит «реанимацию».
После вступления в силу 301-ФЗ Росреестр начал отказывать в регистрации уже построенных домов, в том числе там, где строительство начиналось раньше и собственники получали положительные уведомления. Проблема оказалась общероссийской.
И теперь появилась первая официально озвученная хорошая новость.
Директор департамента КРТ Мин…
🌱 «Садоводство» без права построить садовый дом. Под Пушкино снова земельный сюрприз.
Пока не закончилась история почти с 2 тыс. домов в 11 коттеджных посёлках, администрация Пушкинского округа предупредила уже собственников КП «Лепешки Village» и территории южнее д. Березняки.
По ПЗЗ территория находится в зоне СХ-3 - сельскохозяйственное производство. А в ЕГРН у участков указан ВРИ «Садоводство» с кодом 1.5.
И з…
🫣 Борщевик на участке может сорвать вам не только урожай. Но и отпуск за границей.
В Пермском крае собственники участка площадью 1,5 га проигнорировали требование властей уничтожить борщевик. Дело дошло до суда, затем - до приставов. После неисполнения судебного решения владельцам временно ограничили выезд из России. Землю расчистили - ограничение сняли.
Важно: юридически выезд закрыли не «за борщевик», а за неиспо…
48 283 участника. 300 полуфиналистов. Победа.
Я стал победителем Всероссийского конкурса управленцев «Лидеры строительной отрасли».
И для меня здесь есть особенно важный смысл.
Около 80% участников финального этапа - представители государственного сектора: главные архитекторы городов, заместители министров и губернаторов, руководители профильных ведомств. Рядом - топ-менеджеры и руководители крупных девелоперов и …
🏠 Морской контейнер за 2 млн ₽ может стать домом. А может навсегда остаться железным ящиком.
Интерес к контейнерным домам растёт: рынок объясняет это дорогой ипотекой и стоимостью классического строительства. В публичных оценках встречается рост спроса до 60% за два года.
Но главный вопрос - можно ли такой дом зарегистрировать в ЕГРН?
Можно. Но не потому, что внутри появилась кровать.
Закон смотрит на другое: ест…
КТО ИНТЕРЕСОВАЛСЯ ВАШЕЙ НЕДВИЖИМОСТЬЮ?
РОСРЕЕСТР ЭТО ПОМНИТ.
Собственник может заказать специальную справку о лицах, получивших сведения об объекте недвижимости.
Она покажет, кто запрашивал сведения о вашей квартире, доме или земельном участке за последние 3 года: граждан, организации и в предусмотренных случаях органы власти.
Особенно интересно проверить объект перед судебным спором, разделом имущества или когда …
👍6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @Mos_Kad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@Mos_Kad edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“MosKad” (@Mos_Kad), 10,057 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mos_Kad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.