Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
10 measurements spanning 44 days, net -83. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,498–1,605 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
22 Oct 2026, 00:30
1,510
-10
18 Oct 2026, 14:40
1,520
-4
15 Oct 2026, 18:09
1,524
-7
12 Oct 2026, 16:48
1,531
-6
6 Oct 2026, 00:17
1,537
-16
28 Sept 2026, 13:17
1,553
-20
19 Sept 2026, 02:21
1,573
-8
14 Sept 2026, 18:54
1,581
-3
11 Sept 2026, 03:22
1,584
-9
8 Sept 2026, 07:22
1,593
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
26 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
20
76.9%
🔥
4
15.4%
❤
1
3.85%
👏
1
3.85%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
20.0%
1 of 5 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
74.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
77.0
over 4 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqveJHGR
1
8 December 2025
8 December 2025
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 8 December 2025. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Набор радиусных шаблонов №1 (Шаблоны сварщика WG-R1)
Широкий ассортимент, качественные товары, актуальные цены
Компания Омега Тест Групп
Подробнее
Реклама. erid: 2VtzqveJHGR ИНН: 5036178759
Рекламодатель ООО "ОТГ"
🔥 «Вы не встретите никого, кому бы не нравился Путин».
Такое признание сделал американский журналист Такер Карлсон.
Где бы вы ни находились, вы не встретите никого, кому бы не нравился Путин, Путин словно всемирная знаменитость. Я много путешествую, я знаю о чем говорю,
— заявил телеведущий.
Также Карлсон высказался на тему окончания украинского конфликта. По его словам, Киев и его европейские союзники не имеют ша…
🚰 Воду из-под крана можно пить — конечно, желательно ее предварительно вскипятить, но в целом она пригодна для употребления.
Что делает воду такой — читайте в карточке.
#ФРТ_в_двух_словах
Следите за новостями Фонда развития территорий
🇷🇺В Алтайском филиале Президентской академии сегодня собрались участники специальной военной операции, которые пройдут обучение по программе «Алтай – земля героев». Они познакомятся с основами государственного и муниципального управления, получат знания и навыки, необходимые для работы в органах власти. Началу обучения первого потока предшествовала большая работа по подготовке образовательной программы и отбору ее сл…
🇷🇺Некоммерческие организации, помогающие участникам СВО и семьям бойцов, смогут получить дополнительную государственную поддержку. Соответствующие поправки в федеральный закон «О некоммерческих организациях» внесены в Государственную Думу. Стала соавтором законопроекта вместе с коллегами-сенаторами и депутатами.
☑️ Мы предложили включить в перечень видов деятельности НКО, дающих право на финансовую поддержку, содейс…
👍5
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @Moskva60. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Русские хиты | Музыка | Песни @khity2 · 28,103 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Москва online” (@Moskva60), 1,510 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Moskva60.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
