27 measurements spanning 28 days, net -186. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,540–21,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 22:58
21,599
+20
3 Sept 2026, 06:25
21,579
-26
1 Sept 2026, 23:34
21,605
-22
31 Aug 2026, 21:34
21,627
-17
30 Aug 2026, 19:28
21,644
-12
29 Aug 2026, 19:25
21,656
-11
28 Aug 2026, 17:24
21,667
-19
27 Aug 2026, 14:36
21,686
-15
26 Aug 2026, 14:06
21,701
-21
25 Aug 2026, 13:33
21,722
-8
24 Aug 2026, 13:48
21,730
-16
23 Aug 2026, 00:56
21,746
-26
21 Aug 2026, 13:53
21,772
-13
20 Aug 2026, 14:07
21,785
-16
19 Aug 2026, 16:25
21,801
-13
18 Aug 2026, 16:15
21,814
-16
17 Aug 2026, 16:26
21,830
-8
16 Aug 2026, 08:28
21,838
+5
14 Aug 2026, 19:27
21,833
+120
13 Aug 2026, 06:54
21,713
first reading
Engagement
96 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 21,599 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,620
89 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
89
of 96 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 88 of 89 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
96 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
233,571
Reactions total
3,025
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 07s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,282 reactions across 95 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5368472828079273665
1,926
58.7%
custom 5368734258443617179
984
30.0%
custom 5368813461935520502
372
11.3%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 95 of the 96 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,282 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Література «Божевільних» 📚
(частина 1)
Список книг, які читали герої одного з найкращих серіалів усіх часів.
📖 «Пекло»
Данте Аліг'єрі
📖 «Вихід»
Леон Юріс
📖 «Майстер на всі руки»
Бернард Маламуд
📖 «Фраґмент аналізу однієї істерії»
Зиґмунд Фройд
📖 «Медитації в екстремальних ситуаціях»
Френк О’Гара
📖 «У виграшній позиції»
Дік Френсіс
📖 «Синдром Портноя»
Філіп Рот
📖 «Корабель дурнів»
Кетрін Енн Портер
📖 «Шпигун…
Рік Далтон і Кліфф Бут знають, що випити, а що поїсти 🍝🍹
Леонардо Ді Капріо та Бред Пітт подарували нам один із найкультовіших дуетів сучасного кіно: кінозірку на останньому подиху та його дублера-каскадера, які пливуть за течією голлівудського світу.
🎬 Одного разу… в Голлівуді (2019)
реж. Квентін Тарантіно
RT 86% IMDb 7.6
🎵 Bobby Caldwell - What You Won't Do for Love
Кіно Дайджест 🎧
#фрагменти
Класика кіберпанку 🌀
(частина 1)
У кіберпанку поміж видовищності закладено безліч тем, які насамперед досліджують людську природу. У цих неймовірних, створених багатою уявою світах, здається можливим абсолютно все, і кожен може стати ким завгодно — але за страшну ціну.
🎞 Темне місто (1997)
реж. Алекс Прояс
RT 78% IMDb 7.5
🎞 Відеодром (1982)
реж. Девід Кроненберг
RT 83% IMDb 7.2
🎞 Той, хто біжить по лезу 2049 (2…
🕒 П'ятеро різних підлітків, які ніколи б не заговорили одне з одним у звичайному житті, опиняються замкненими в школі на весь вихідний. Хуліган, спортсмен, дивачка, розумник і красуня повинні написати есе про те, ким вони є.
Кіно Дайджест 🎧
#квіз
Яка країна є батьківщиною радикального кінематографічного маніфесту «Догма 95», що вимагав повної відмови від будь-яких спецефектів, декорацій та штучного освітлення у кіно?
Швеція 🇸🇪32%
Норвегія 🇳🇴17%
Данія 🇩🇰38%
Німеччина 🇩🇪14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🚫 Історія кінематографа знає чимало радикальних рухів та мистецьких маніфестів, які виникали як реакція проти мейнстримного кіновиробництва та виступали закликом до інших творців кіно.
Кіно Дайджест 🎧
#добірки #квіз
Порожній Лондон знімали по-справжньому. Режисер Денні Бойл знімав сцени на світанку щонеділі, маючи всього 1–2 хвилини на кожен кадр. Такі культові локації, як Вестмінстерський міст ненадовго перекривали за участю мінімальної знімальної групи, а блокувати дороги допомагали охоронці з нічних клубів.
📸 28 днів потому (2002)
реж. Денні Бойл
RT 87% IMDb 7.5
Кіно Дайджест 🎧
#галерея
6 фільмів аби зрозуміти Америку 🇺🇸
Фільми, такі ж різні за жанрами й настроями, як і сама Америка.
🎞 Нешвілл (1975)
реж. Роберт Альтман
RT 89% IMDb 7.6
🎞 Під кайфом та збентежені (1993)
реж. Річард Лінклейтер
RT 94% IMDb 7.6
🎞 Туман (1980)
реж. Джон Карпентер
RT 76% IMDb 6.8
🎞 Прокол (1981)
реж. Брайан де Пальма
RT 88% IMDb 7.4
🎞 Щелепи (1975)
реж. Стівен Спілберг
RT 97% IMDb 8.1
🎞 Дядько Сем (1996)
реж. …
Стиль Дона Дрейпера 🥃🚬
Дон Дрейпер не просто носив костюм — він володів ним, мов зброєю
Кожна лінія була вивіреною: чіткі плечі, вузька краватка — справжні обладунки людини, яка створила себе з нуля і за жодних обставин не збиралася цього виказувати.
Кіно Дайджест 🎧
#галерея
custom 536847282807927366530
Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @MovieDigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Яка країна є батьківщиною радикального кінематографічного маніфесту «Догма 95», що вимагав повної відмови від будь-яких спецефектів, декорацій та штучного освітлення у кіно?
Швеція 🇸🇪32%
Норвегія 🇳🇴17%
Данія 🇩🇰38%
Німеччина 🇩🇪14%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Головний герой — харизматичний гангстер із гострим розумом, який вирішує збудувати американське Монте-Карло посеред нічого, всупереч здоровому глузду та правилам власного синдикату
Таємниці Лос-Анджелеса (1997)14%
Баґсі (1991)33%
Казино (1995)50%
Авіатор (2004)4%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 96 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кіно Дайджест — твій кіногід 📽” (@MovieDigest), 21,599 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MovieDigest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
