Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Movie TV Box 🎬

Channel

Movie TV Box 🎬

@MovieTVBox

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

47,857subscribers

-8,528 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002105188865
TypeChannel
Username@MovieTVBox
DescriptionИдеальное кино для истинных ценителей: бесплатные кинотеатры и актуальные новости киноиндустрии. Все публикации из открытых источников в ознакомительных целях. Админ: @Vep_SL
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MovieTVBox

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

47,85756,38552,1216 August 2026 — 56,385 subscribers6 August 2026 — 56,277 subscribers7 August 2026 — 55,667 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,519 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,039 subscribers11 August 2026 — 53,614 subscribers12 August 2026 — 53,216 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,788 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,343 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,839 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,368 subscribers18 August 2026 — 50,923 subscribers19 August 2026 — 50,548 subscribers20 August 2026 — 50,210 subscribers22 August 2026 — 49,825 subscribers24 August 2026 — 49,373 subscribers25 August 2026 — 49,092 subscribers26 August 2026 — 48,819 subscribers27 August 2026 — 48,526 subscribers28 August 2026 — 48,271 subscribers29 August 2026 — 48,036 subscribers30 August 2026 — 47,857 subscribers6 August 202630 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -8,528. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,578–57,664 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 01:2747,857-179
29 Aug 2026, 04:5548,036-235
28 Aug 2026, 05:4448,271-255
27 Aug 2026, 06:5348,526-293
26 Aug 2026, 04:4948,819-273
25 Aug 2026, 04:3849,092-281
24 Aug 2026, 02:0149,373-452
22 Aug 2026, 11:4449,825-385
20 Aug 2026, 23:5750,210-338
19 Aug 2026, 21:4850,548-375
18 Aug 2026, 21:2750,923-445
17 Aug 2026, 19:4551,368-471
16 Aug 2026, 14:2451,839-504
15 Aug 2026, 00:2552,343-445
13 Aug 2026, 16:2752,788-428
12 Aug 2026, 14:4553,216-398
11 Aug 2026, 15:4553,614-425
10 Aug 2026, 17:1454,039-480
9 Aug 2026, 16:0154,519-556
8 Aug 2026, 13:3255,075first reading

Engagement

393 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.36%
avg views ÷ 47,857 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
393 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.917%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
393
of 393 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 348 of 393 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held393 (5 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total443,528
Reactions total3,648
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,140
Videos
213
Links
818

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 48m
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 109 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,488 reactions across 333 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,41940.7%
74421.3%
🔥35410.1%
🍌1424.07%
🙈1293.70%
😎862.47%
😱802.29%
🤪752.15%
😁531.52%
👎451.29%
🥰401.15%
👌361.03%
🥴351.00%
😍340.975%
🤡320.917%
😢290.831%
270.774%
👀170.487%
🍾110.315%
❤‍🔥100.287%
18 further kinds902.58%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 348 of the 393 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,648reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 393 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 393 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MovieTVBox. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 393 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC851 viewsread 30 August 2026

Друзья, привет! Сегодня команда @GrampexUP собрала подборку каналов, которые вас точно заинтересуют ▫️@TopTariffs — НЕПУБЛИЧКА, правда или обман? И почему с ней так много экономят? Добро пожаловать в топовый сервис! ◾️@Premium_droid — ТОП взломанных PRO/Premium версии приложений и игр на Android, абсолютно бесплатно. ◾️@popmeh — канал о том как устроен мир. Мы рассказываем обо всех достижениях человеческой мысли,

29 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC958 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Тизер и пара кадров экшн-хоррора Зака Креггера ("Варвар", "Орудия") Обитель зла (Resident Evil). Премьера - 18 сентября Крутяк. Ждем 👍 НЕ ждем. 🤡 📲Мы в MAX

👍4🤡1😎1

29 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,070 views7 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Джессика Честейн в русском трейлере хоррора Чужая мама (Other Mommy). В семье 8-летней Бэллы - проблемы. Что бы уйти от невеселой реальности - она начинает дружить с "Другой Мамой" - сущностью, которая выходит из еë шкафа. Премьера - 9 октября 📲Мы в MAX

👍41🔥1😎1

29 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC≈1,050 views15 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Джек Блэк говорит, что хочет снять Школу рока 2 (School of Rock 2) после более чем двух десятилетий ожидания фанатов, но сделает это только в том случае, если вернется автор оригинала Майк Уайт. Блэк: "Я бы хотел, чтобы в "School of Rock 2" было электрическое бугалу - мы бы вернули Майка Уайта в строй, но он сейчас очень занят". "Школа рока" вышла в 2003 году и рассказывала о бывшей рок-звезде Дьюи Финне (Блэк), ко

👍10🍌41

29 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC960 views3 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Хелен Миррен в трейлере фильма Последнее убийство мистера Рипли (A Talent for Murder) Писательницу Патрицию Хайсмент (Миррен), автора книг о мистере Рипли - убеждают написать еще один роман об этом герое. Она готова согласиться, если ее литературный агент поможет ей придумать идеальное убийство. Премьера - 23 октября Знаю мистера Рипли 👍 Кто это? 👀 📲Мы в MAX

👍2👎1

29 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

Настоящий кот-бильярдист😎 📲Мы в MAX

👍6🔥1😁1

29 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,160 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

«Бумер» возвращается? Пётр Буслов сообщил, что работает над приквелом «Бумер. Начало». Подробности режиссёр пока держит в секрете. Также Буслов планирует криминальный фильм «Банда» — события развернутся в 1995 году. 📲Мы в MAX

👍2

29 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,290 views6 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

По рассказу Стивена Кинга Крауч-Энд (Crouch End) - снимут сериал. По сюжету, Дорис Фриман и ее муж отправляются в Крауч-Энд, район Лондона. По дороге они замечают весьма странные вещи, происходящие вокруг... Вскоре муж Дорис пропадает. Рассказ входит в сборник Кинга "Ночные кошмары и фантастические видения" (1980). В 2006 году вышла одноименная ТВ-антология, которая содержала в себе экранизацию этого рассказа. Сер

🔥41🙈1

29 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC912 views7 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Постеры приключенческого триллера Вышка 2 (Fall 2) Первый фильм вышел в 2022 году и собрал $22 млн при бюджете в $3 млн. Лента рассказывала о двух девушках-скалолазах, которые залезли на заброшенную радиовышку и застряли на ней. Сюжет сиквела: Пара альпинистов оказывается отрезана от мира на огромной высоте после сошедшего оползня. Премьера - 2 сентября Крутяк. Ждем 👍 НЕ ждем 🤡 Не смотрел первый 🍌 📲Мы в MAX

👍6🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 393 posts we hold for @MovieTVBox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@MovieTVBox edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Лучший фильм Колма Фиора

  1. Без лица25%
  2. Город ангелов2%
  3. Буря столетия (сериал)9%
  4. Час расплаты5%
  5. Шоссе смерти0%
  6. Хроники Риддика45%
  7. Шесть демонов Эмили Роуз2%
  8. Подмена2%
  9. Новый Человек-паук: Высокое напряжение5%
  10. Академия Амбрелла (сериал)5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 04:38 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

Лучший фильм Дастина Хоффмана

  1. Соломенные псы (1971)0%
  2. Мотылек (1973)5%
  3. Крамер против Крамер1%
  4. Тутси12%
  5. Человек дождя49%
  6. Капитан Крюк7%
  7. Эпидемия9%
  8. Плутовство0%
  9. Вердикт за деньги1%
  10. Парфюмер: История одного убийцы15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 393 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 255,181 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Movie TV Box 🎬” (@MovieTVBox), 47,857 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MovieTVBox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.