Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for چالش های استارزی | Mr~Gift

Channel

چالش های استارزی | Mr~Gift

@MrGiftAli

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

19,078subscribers

-3,924 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002619116560
TypeChannel
Username@MrGiftAli
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/MrGiftAli

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,10128,03521,0687 August 2026 — 23,002 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,506 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,770 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,668 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,532 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,424 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,470 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,101 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,035 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,739 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,768 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,695 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,576 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,497 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,458 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,248 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,116 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,944 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,896 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,183 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,372 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,398 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,337 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,649 subscribers4 September 2026 — 18,928 subscribers7 September 2026 — 19,167 subscribers10 September 2026 — 19,078 subscribers19,0787 August 202610 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 34 days, net -3,924. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,011–30,125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 08:3819,078-89
7 Sept 2026, 04:3819,167+239
4 Sept 2026, 13:4118,928+279
3 Sept 2026, 01:1718,649+312
1 Sept 2026, 20:2518,337-61
31 Aug 2026, 19:1518,398+26
30 Aug 2026, 17:5518,372+189
29 Aug 2026, 18:2618,183+287
28 Aug 2026, 16:4817,896-48
27 Aug 2026, 17:0717,944-172
26 Aug 2026, 19:3418,116-132
25 Aug 2026, 22:1318,248-210
24 Aug 2026, 19:4618,458-39
23 Aug 2026, 07:1418,497-79
21 Aug 2026, 17:5818,576-119
20 Aug 2026, 18:0618,695-73
19 Aug 2026, 15:2618,768+29
18 Aug 2026, 18:5218,739-9,296
17 Aug 2026, 16:0628,035+7,979
16 Aug 2026, 08:4820,056first reading

Engagement

783 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.469%
avg views ÷ 19,078 subscribers
Avg views / post
89.4
605 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
606
of 783 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 263 of 605 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held783 (7 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total54,113
Reactions total798
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 39s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

972 reactions across 316 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38439.5%
🤣29129.9%
❤‍🔥555.66%
🔥434.42%
🗿373.81%
👍292.98%
282.88%
🍾191.95%
👏161.65%
🥰141.44%
👌121.23%
🤝101.03%
😁80.823%
😘80.823%
🎉50.514%
💯40.412%
👻30.309%
🙏30.309%
😎20.206%
🎃10.103%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 333 of the 783 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 972 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 783 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
907
across the posts below
Posts paid on
43
of 782 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
351
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @MrGiftAli. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 783 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC27 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @SHAH_LAND

ارزون ترین تون دنیا 0.8 تون فقط و فقط 240 تومن بدون کارمزد ❤️🙁

Signed 𝓝𝓲𝓷𝓳𝓪 🥷

3 Sept 2026, 04:22 UTC94 viewsread 3 September 2026

15 تدی تایم 5 ساعت🌹

Signed 𝑼𝒏𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘𝒏

2 Sept 2026, 23:55 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

بخش ا‌پگرید به این صورت اینا نمیزارم تحریک کنم برید خودم‌ گیفتا و رایگان گرفتم که گذاشتم اپگرید برام مهم نبود وگرنه قمار خوب نیست سمتش نرید اینام میزارم کسایی که آشناییت ندارن با بخش اپگیرید یا تاحالا انجام ندادن و اینا ببینن کلا باحاله

4

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 23:51 UTC92 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

من اصلا اهل قمار نیستم ولی خدایی تو بخش اپگرید تا الان نباختم تو‌هیچ باتی 3 گیفت دادیم 2 گیفت ملوسک کشیدیم بیرون 🌚🚬 لینک ورود به ربات ترید

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 23:09 UTC98 viewsread 3 September 2026

رقابتی نشد بخوایم اسکمش کنیم پس مهم نیست میگند باگ خورده تلگرامش جایزش فردا تقدیم میشه برید بخوابید 👑✔️ شبتون خوش ❤️ گپ بازه جهت معامله و حرف و بحث و دعوا و اینا 👇👇 گپ

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 23:02 UTC89 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

آقا برا من باگه یا واقعا 500 استارز شد 350 ؟

🤣2

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 22:49 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

آخرین بار یادم یچیزی دادم خودم پشمام ریخت جوراب بک گنمیتال و کی یادشه ؟ همین استارزی که زده بود جایی دیگه زده بود مشعل بک صورتی میدادن 🌚🚬 لینک پستش

🔥1

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 22:46 UTC80 viewsread 3 September 2026

بیاید ببینم دنیا دست کیه 🌚🚬 بستگی به رقابت و استارزی که میزنید NFT میدیم دیگه یهو خالی نکنید رقابت سالم کنید سود سالم ببرید 👑✔️

Signed Ali

2 Sept 2026, 22:44 UTC86 views5 reactions351 Starsread 3 September 2026

چالش دونیتی رقابتی 💸💰 بیشترین استارز روی این پست تا ساعت 2:29:59 وینه 🎉🎉 جایزه : رقابتی تا NFT🔥💥 میانگین 350🌟 استارز خوبه و سود خوبی میکنید ✅ ‼️زیر میانگین نزنید ،یکم بیشتر میانگین برای رقابت مشکلی نداره ‼️رقابت سالم سود سالم و خفن 👑✔️ ‼️ریکورد 1 دقیقه آخر اجباری✅

🤣5

Signed Ali

Showing the 12 most recent of 783 posts we hold for @MrGiftAli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@MrGiftAli edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چالش های استارزی | Mr~Gift” (@MrGiftAli), 19,078 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MrGiftAli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.